.
Angewandte
Communications
In order to differentiate these mechanistic alternatives, we
have also studied the rate of the reaction of the C-1-
deuterated benzhydrylium ion D-2b (Ar2C-D+) with the
ynamide 1a. As shown in Figure 3, the deuterated benzhy-
1
drylium ion D-2b reacts even faster than its H isotopomer
ꢁ
2b, which excludes breaking of the C H bond in the rate-
determining step.
Figure 4. Plots of lgk2 for the reactions of benzhydrylium ions 2a–c
with ynamides 1a–d in CH2Cl2 at 208C versus the electrophilicity
parameters E of the benzhydrylium ions.
Figure 3. Comparison of the first-order rate constants kobs obtained for
the reactions of benzhydrylium ions (mfa)2CH+ (2b, triangles) and
(mfa)2CD+ (D-2b, circles) with different amounts of ynamide 1a (data
point shown as an open circle was not used for determining k2 (D-
2b)).
The ratio k2(2b)/k2(D-2b) = 0.91 rather corresponds to an
inverse a-secondary kinetic isotope effect, which is typical for
reactions involving rehybridization Csp2 !Csp3 in the rate-
determining step.[5] We thus conclude that the rate constants
listed in Table 3 reflect the attack of the benzhydrylium ions
2a–c at the ynamides 1a–d with irreversible formation of the
keteniminium ions 5. As this step corresponds to the type of
reactions for which Equation (1) was derived, it is now
lg k ð20 ꢂCÞ ¼ sNðN þ EÞ
ð1Þ
possible to determine the nucleophile-specific parameters N
and sN by plotting lgk2 of the rate constants in Table 3 against
the electrophilicity parameters E of the benzhydrylium ions
2a–c (Figure 4).
The linear correlations shown in Figure 4 indicate that all
investigated reactions follow analogous mechanisms. As the
sensitivities sN (slopes of the correlation lines) are similar to
those of related p-nucleophiles,[4g] the nucleophilicity param-
eters N (negative intercepts on the abscissa) can directly be
employed to discuss structure–reactivity relationships.
Figure 5 shows that ynamides 1a–d possess nucleophilic-
ities that are comparable to those of (2-methylallyl)trime-
thylsilane (6)[4a] and butyl vinyl ether (7).[4f] They are
significantly less reactive than enamines,[6] as shown by the
comparison of the structurally related compounds 8b and 1c.
Replacement of the alkyl substituents at the position of
electrophilic attack by a phenyl group decreases the nucleo-
philicities of enamines (8b!8a) as well as of ynamides (1c!
1a) by approximately one order of magnitude. Structurally
related enamides,[7] such as 9, were reported to possess
nucleophilicities of 4.6 < N < 7.1, that is, somewhat higher
than those found for the ynamides 1a–d in this work.
Why do hydrocarbations, as described in Scheme 1b, in
Figure 5. Comparison of the nucleophilicity N of ynamides 1a–d (sN in
parentheses) with those of other p-nucleophiles[4 g] in CH2Cl2 (CH3CN
for enamides; [a] estimated value of sN; [b] nucleophilicity parameter
adjusted to the revised electrophilicity parameters E of the reference
electrophiles given in Ref. [4f]).
bonds in borohydride anions are far better hydride donors
than C H bonds,[8] the zwitterion 12 shown in Scheme 4 is not
ꢁ
formed as an intermediate in hydroboration reactions, as it
would undergo activation-less collapse to the hydroboration
[9]
ꢁ
product (Jencksꢀ criterion ). In contrast, C H bonds are
much poorer hydride donors, and 1,3-hydride migrations in
carbocations are generally slow, even when the hydride
transfer is exothermic.[10] As a consequence, carbocations 13,
which are formed by the addition of a carbocation to an olefin
ꢁ
contrast to hydroborations generally not take place? As B H
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 4968 –4971