A. Benksim et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 48 (2007) 5087–5089
5089
Table 3. 13C NMR data of diethyl 3-oxoglutarate moiety of 5a–d
Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 1503–1531; (c) Pellissier, H. Tetra-
hedron 2005, 61, 2947–2993; (d) Toshima, K. Carbohydr.
Res. 2006, 341, 1282–1287.
Products
C-10
C-20
C-30
C-40
C-50
5a
5b
5c
5d
170.0
170.0
170.1
169.9
98.7
98.7
97.7
97.5
165.3
165.3
165.0
165.1
37.7
37.7
38.6
38.7
167.2
167.2
167.8
167.8
2. (a) Schmidt, R. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1986, 98,
213–236; (b) Sinay, P. Pure Appl. Chem. 1991, 63, 519–
¨
528; (c) Toshima, K. Carbohydr. Res. 2000, 327, 15–26; (d)
Jensen, K. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2002, 2219–
2233; (e) Jacobsson, M.; Malmberg, J.; Ellervik, U.
Carbohydr. Res. 2006, 341, 1266–1281.
between d 169.9–170.1 ppm and d 167.2–167.8 ppm
3. El Meslouti, A.; Beaupere, D.; Demailly, G.; Uzan, R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 3913–3916.
4. (a) Beaupere, D.; El Meslouti, A.; Lelievre, P.; Uzan, R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 5347–5348; (b) Roussel, F.;
Wadouachi, A.; Beaupere, D. Carbohydr. Lett. 2000, 3,
397–404.
assigned to the carbonyl groups C-50 and C-10, respec-
tively, quaternary C-30 had
a signal between d
165.0 and 165.3 and methylene C-40 between d 37.7
and 38.7 ppm (Table 3). These data agreed with that
reported in the literature for O-alkylated 3-
oxoglutarates.15
5. Aouad, M. E.; El Meslouti, A.; Uzan, R.; Beaupere, D.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 6279–6282.
6. Benksim, A.; Beaupere, D.; Wadouachi, A. Org. Lett.
2004, 6, 3913–3915.
We have observed that reactions of cyclic sulfites with
alcohols did not produce the desired O-glycosides. Alk-
oxides led to hydrolysis of the sulfite via addition at the
sulfur atom and gave starting material. D-Glucopyrano-
side compounds have already been prepared from 1,2-O-
sulfinyl derivatives by reaction with allyl, benzyl and
cyclohexyl alcohol in the presence of lanthanide (III) tri-
flates. Tri-acetylated or benzoylated protected 1,2-cyclic
sulfite of D-glucose provided an a/b mixture of ano-
7. (a) Hay, R. W.; Caughley, B. P. Aust. J. Chem. 1967, 20,
1829–1839; (b) Muramoto, Y.; Oishi, K.; Ichimoto, I.;
Ueda, H. Nippon Nogei Kagaku Kaishi 1974, 48, 507–513.
8. Covarrubias-Zuniga, A.; Rios-Barrios, E. J. Org. Chem.
1997, 62, 5688–5689.
9. (a) Covarrubias-Zuniga, A.; Gonzalez-Lucas, A. Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 1998, 39, 2881–2882; (b) Covarrubias-Zuniga,
A.; Gonzalez-Lucas, A.; Dominguez, M. M. Tetrahedron
2003, 59, 1989–1994.
10. Typical procedure of O-glycosylation of diethyl oxoglutar-
ate. To a solution of diethyl oxoglutarate (2 equiv) and
anhydrous potassium carbonate (2.05 equiv) in anhydrous
DMF previously stirred for 1 h, was added dropwise a
solution of 1,2-O-sulfinyl-glycose derivative (1 equiv) in
anhydrous DMF. The mixture was heated at 70 °C until
disappearance of the cyclic sulfite, as checked by thin layer
chromatography (hexane–EtOAc 1:1). Then after addition
of methanol, the solvents were evaporated under reduced
pressure and the residue extracted with CH2Cl2–H2O
(70:30). The organic layers were dried on Na2SO4 then
concentrated. The flash chromatography of the residue
afforded the corresponding O-glycoside derivatives.
11. Kiso, M.; Hasegawa, A. Carbohydr. Res. 1976, 52, 95–101.
12. Du, Y.; Kong, F. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1996, 15, 797–
819.
mers, and only benzyl-protected sulfite gave
b
stereospecificity.16
As we observed with our previous results, reactions
proceeded efficiently with the stabilized anions such as
phenolate; the mechanism of the reaction was an
SN2 displacement at the anomeric atom and only gave
1,2-trans compounds.3–6
In the case of diethyl 3-oxoglutarate, the corresponding
stabilized enolate led only to the O-glycosides com-
pounds without hydrolysis reaction.
In summary, we have described an easy access to O-gly-
cosides derived from diethyl 3-oxoglutarate in good
yields, with free 2-hydroxyl. This method is suitable
for the synthesis of complex glycosides in which the C-
2 position is glycosylated.17 The affinity of complexation
of these glycosides is evaluated with uric acid and will be
reported in due course.
13. Sadeh, S.; Zehavi, U. Carbohydr. Res. 1982, 101, 152–
154.
`
14. Joubert, P.; Beaupere, D.; Wadouachi, A.; Chateau, S.;
´
Sangwan, R. S.; Sangwan-Norreel, B. S. J. Nat. Prod.
2004, 67, 348–351.
15. Covarrubias-Zuniga, A.; German-Sanchez, L. S.; Avila-
Zarraga, J. G. Synth. Commun. 2003, 33, 3165–3172.
16. Sanders, W. J.; Kiessling, L. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35,
7335–7338.
References and notes
17. Dushin, R. G.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992,
114, 3471–3475.
1. For reviews see: (a) Brown, L.; Thomas, R. Aust. J.
Pharm. Sci. 1979, 8, 1–10; (b) Toshima, K.; Tatsuka, K.