E. L. Setti et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13 (2003) 2051–2053
2053
References and Notes
10. The enzyme active site concentrations were measured by
titration with the either E-64 or an in-house vinyl-sulfone.
Inhibition assays: Inhibitor potency measurements were per-
formed at room temperature using 96-well kinetic plate read-
ers. Reaction velocities were monitored at varying inhibitor
concentrations by following the hydrolysis of amino-
methylcoumarin substrates (ex355, em460) as indicated. All
substrates were added at a concentration equal to their Km.
Control reactions in the absence of inhibitor were performed
in parallel. The Ki apparent (Ki0) values were determined by a
non-linear least squares regression fit of the experimentally
derived data to the Morrison equation for tight-binding inhi-
bitors as described (3) or by least squared regression fit of the
Henderson equation for tight-binding inhibitors (4). Enzyme
and inhibitor were incubated 30min prior to initiation of
reaction by the addition of substrate. Cathepsin B: Enzyme
(5.0nM) was mixed with inhibitor in 50mM MES or BES (pH
6.0), 2.5 mM DTT, 2.5 mM EDTA, 0.05% Tween 20 and 10%
DMSO. The substrate was Z-Phe-Arg-AMC (300 mM).
Cathepsin K: Enzyme (3.6 nM) was mixed with inhibitor in 50
mM MES (pH 5.5), 2.5 mM DTT, 2.5 mM EDTA, 0.05%
1. Baron, R. Anatomy and Ultrastructure of Bone. In Primer
on the Metabolic Bone Disorders of Mineral Metabolism, 1st
ed.; Favus, M. J., Ed.; American Society for Bone and Mineral
Research: Kelseyville, CA, 1990, p 3.
2. (a) Drake, F. H.; Dodds, R. A.; James, I. A.; Connor, J. R.;
Debouck, C.; Richardson, S.; Lee-Rykaczewski, L.; Coleman,
L.; Riemann, D.; Barthlow, R.; Hasting, G.; Gowen, M.
J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 12511. (b) Bossard, M. J.; Tomaszek,
T. A.; Thompson, S. K.; Amegadzie, B. Y.; Hanning, C. R.;
Jones, C.; Kurdyla, J. T.; McNulty, D. E.; Drake, F. H.;
Gowen, M.; Levy, M. A. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 12517.
3. McGrath, M. E.; Klaus, J. L.; Barnes, M. G.; Broemme, D.
Nat. Struct. Biol. 1996, 4, 105.
4. Gelleni, M.; Lamotte-Brasseur, J.; Raquet, X.; Dubus, A.;
Monnaire, D.; Knox, J. R.; Frere, J.-M. Biochem. Pharmacol.
1995, 49, 1171.
5. Singh, R.; Zhou, N. E.; Guo, D.; Micetich, R. Int. Pat. WO
98/12176, 1998.
6. Broemme, D.; Okamoto, K.; Wang, B. B.; Biroc, S. J. Biol.
Chem. 1996, 271, 2126.
Tween-20and 1%0 DMSO. The substrate was
Z-Phe-Arg-
7. Arnould, J. C.; Pasquet, M. J. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1992, 27,
131.
AMC (40 mM). Cathepsin L: Enzyme (1.3 nM) was mixed with
inhibitor in 50mM MES (pH 5.5), 2.0mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT,
0.05% Tween-20 and 10% DMSO. The substrate was Z-Phe-
Arg-AMC (10 mM). Cathepsin S: Enzyme (1.0nM) was mixed
with inhibitor in 50mM MES (pH 6.5), 100mM NaCl, 2.5 mM
EDTA, 2.5 mM 2-mercaptoenthanol, 0.001% bovine serum
albumin and 10% DMSO. The substrate was Z-Val-Val-AMC.
11. Ac6 stands for alicyclic 1,1-disbustituted cyclohexyl and
Cy6 for 1,2-disubstituted cyclohexyl.
8. Standard procedure for hydrogenolysis: To a solution 1
(1 mmol) in ethyl acetate (15 mL), 10% Pd/C (200 mg) was
added. The mixture was hydrogenated at 50psi for 8 h. The
catalyst was separated by filtration through a short plug of
Celite and the solution of the amine was used for coupling.
9. Standard procedure for coupling. To a solution of the corres-
ponding acid (1 mmol) in THF (10mL), HATU (380mg, 1
mmol), a solution of the free amine in ethyl acetate (15 mL)
and diisopropylethylamine (209 mL, 1.2 mmol) were added at
rt. The reaction mixture was stirred for 18 h at rt. The mixture
was washed with satd NaHCO3, dried over Na2SO4, evapo-
rated and the crude was purified by silica gel column, using a
mixture of ethyl acetate/hexane (1:1). Satisfactory spectral
data was obtained for all compounds.
12. Unpublished results.
13. Marquis, R. W.; Ru, Y.; Zeng, J.; Lee Trout, R. E.;
LoCastro, S. M.; Gribble, A. D.; Witherington, J.; Fenwick,
A. E.; Garnier, B.; Tomaszek, T.; Tew, D.; Hemling, M. E.;
Quinn, C. J.; Smith, W. W.; Zhao, B.; McQueney, M. S.;
Janson, C. A.; D’Alessio, K.; Veber, D. F. J. Med. Chem.
2001, 44, 725.