4086
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 4086-4087
The New r-Amino Acid
Nω-Hydroxy-nor-L-arginine: a High-Affinity
Inhibitor of Arginase Well Adapted To Bind to Its
Manganese Cluster
J. Custot,† C. Moali,† M. Brollo,† J. L. Boucher,†
M. Delaforge,† D. Mansuy,*,† J. P. Tenu,‡ and
J. L. Zimmermann§
Laboratoire de Chimie et Biochimie
Pharmacologiques et Toxicologiques, URA 400 CNRS
UniVersite´ Rene´ Descartes, 45 rue des Saints-Pe`res
75270 Paris Cedex 06, France
CNRS, URA 1116, Baˆt. 432
UniVersite´ Paris XI, 91405 Orsay, France
CEA/Saclay, De´partement de Biologie Cellulaire
et Mole´culaire, Section de Bioe´nerge´tique
Baˆt. 532, 91191 Gif Sur YVette, France
ReceiVed January 28, 1997
Mammalian arginases specifically require a Mn(II)-Mn(II)
cluster for their catalytic activity, the hydrolysis of L-arginine
(L-arg) to L-ornithine and urea.1 Quite recently, the crystal
structure of rat liver arginase has shown that the two Mn ions
are bridged by two carboxylate side chains of aspartates from
the protein and a water molecule (or hydroxide ion).2 It has
been proposed that L-arg binds in close proximity of the Mn-
cluster and that the transition state of the reaction is a tetrahedral
species resulting from nucleophilic attack of the metal-bridging
hydroxide at the guanidinium carbon of L-arg (Figure 1).2,3 Very
few data are presently available about the accessibility of the
Mn-cluster to molecules different from L-arg, and borate was
the only compound described so far to significantly modify the
EPR spectrum of arginase.4 Inhibitors often are interesting tools
to explore enzyme active sites. For arginase, for a long time
the best known inhibitor was L-valine, which exhibits a modest
Ki value (in the millimolar range).5 More recently, Nω-hydroxy-
L-arginine (NOHA)6 (Scheme 1), an intermediate in the bio-
synthesis of NO from L-arginine, and some Nω-hydroxy-L-R-
aminoacids7 have been shown to act as much more potent
inhibitors of arginases with Ki values in the 20-50 µM range.
A model has been proposed for the interaction of those inhibitors
with arginase, which postulated that they could be of the
transition state analog type, the N-OH group being able to
replace the hydroxo ligand of the arginase Mn-cluster.6a,7 On
the basis of this model, it appeared to us that Nω-hydroxy-nor-
L-arginine (nor-NOHA) should be a very good arginase inhibitor,
well suited to interact with the Mn cluster Via its N-OH
function (better than NOHA, Figure 1).
Figure 1. Schematic view of the postulated arginase transition state
and a proposed model for interaction of arginase with nor-HOHA and
NOHA.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Nω-Hydroxy-nor-L-arginine
(nor-NOHA) and Formula of NOHA and homo-NOHAa
a Boc: -COOtBu; Z ) COOCH2Ph; (a) according to the general
procedure of ref 10; (b) conditions as in ref 11; (c) conditions of those
steps and the following ones as described for the synthesis of NOHA.8d
This paper reports preliminary results about (i) the first
synthesis of Nω-hydroxy-nor-L-arginine and its homolog Nω-
hydroxy-homo-L-arginine, (ii) a comparison of the inhibitory
effects of NOHA, homo-NOHA, and nor-NOHA toward argi-
nases, and (iii) EPR studies of the interaction of these
compounds with purified rat liver arginase. They show that
nor-NOHA not only is the best inhibitor (Ki ) 0.5 µM) but
also specifically modifies the arginase EPR spectrum.
Nω-hydroxy-homo-L-arginine (homo-NOHA) (Scheme 1)9
was synthesized from L-lysine following a procedure previously
described for the synthesis of NOHA.8 Nor-NOHA9 was
obtained from L-glutamine from reactions shown in Scheme 1
(15% overall yield). The key step was the decarboxylation of
NR-Boc-L-glutamine by sodium hypobromite to intermediate
NR-Boc-nor-L-ornithine which was readily protected as a Nδ-
† Universite´ Rene´ Descartes.
‡ Universite´ Paris XI.
§ CEA/Saclay.
(1) Reczkowski, R. S.; Ash, D. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10992-
10994.
(2) Kanyo, Z. F.; Scolnick, L. R.; Ash, D. E.; Christianson, D. W. Nature
1996, 383, 554-557.
(3) Reczkowski, R. S.; Ash, D. E. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1994, 312,
31-37.
(4) Khangulov, S. V.; Pessiki, P. J.; Barynin, V. V.; Ash, D. E.;
Dismukes, G. C. Biochemistry 1995, 34, 2015-2025.
(5) Hunter, A.; Downs, C. E. J. Biol. Chem. 1946, 157, 427-446.
(6) (a) Daghigh, F.; Fukuto, J. M.; Ash, D. E. Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Commun. 1994, 202, 174-180. (b) Boucher, J. L.; Custot, J.; Vadon, S.;
Delaforge, M.; Lepoivre, M.; Tenu, J. P.; Yapo, A.; Mansuy, D. Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 1994, 203, 1614-1621.
(9) Both homo- and nor-NOHA were characterized by 1H and 13C NMR
spectroscopies: δ13C(D2O) 24.3, 30.3, 32, 43.5, 55.9, 161.6, 175.3 and 31.8,
40.1, 53.2, 161.5, 174.2, respectively. Mass spectrometry m/z (ES): 205.23
and 177.18 (M + H+), respectively.
(7) Custot, J.; Boucher, J. L.; Vadon, S.; Guedes, C.; Dijols, S.; Delaforge,
M.; Mansuy, D. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 1, 73-82.
(8) (a) Feldman, P. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 875-878. (b) Wallace,
G. C.; Fukuto, J. M. J. Med. Chem. 1991, 34, 1746-1748. (c) Bailey, D.
M.; DeGrazia, C. G.; Lape, H. E.; Frering, R.; Fort, D.; Skulan, T. J. Med.
Chem. 1973, 16, 151-156. (d) Vadon, S.; Custot, J.; Boucher, J. L.; Mansuy,
D. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1996, 645-648.
(10) Rudinger, J.; Poduska, K.; Zaoral, M. Coll. CzechosloV. Chem.
Commun. 1960, 25, 2022-2028.
(11) Chevallet, P.; Garrouste, P.; Malawska, B.; Martinez, J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1993, 34, 7409-7412.
S0002-7863(97)00285-0 CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society