968
LETTERS
SYNLETT
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research
Council (EPSRC) for support of A.D.H.
References and Footnotes
(1) (a) Curran, D. P.; Qi, H.; Geib, S. J.; DeMello, N. C. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1994, 116, 3131. (b) For a more recent contribution, see
Curran, D. P.; Hale, G. R.; Geib, S. J.; Balog, A.; Cass, Q. B.;
Degani, A. L. G.; Hernandes, M. Z.; Freita, L.C. G. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1997, 8, 3955.
Scheme 3
10
product. Assignment of the configuration of the asymmetric carbon
centre in 11 allows that centre to be assigned in 10, and we can then
infer the configuration of the aryl-C–N axis as shown in 10, 4 and 9.
(2) For a listing of contributions in this area, see Ahmed, A.; Clayden,
J.; Rowley, M. Chem. Commun. 1998, 297.
Since the type of amide deoxygenation shown in Scheme 2 appeared
11
rather rare, and the application of SmI to such amide reduction was
(3) Hughes, A. D.; Price, D. A.; Shishkin, O.; Simpkins, N. S.
2
12
unprecedented, we applied the new method to a range of other amides,
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 7607.
13
as shown in the Table.
(4) Kitagawa, O.; Izawa, H.; Sato, K.; Dobashi, A.; Taguchi, T. J.Org.
Chem. 1998, 63, 2634.
(5) Bodansky, M. Principles of Peptide Synthesis; Springer-Verlag:
New York, 1984; p 9–58.
(6) The atropisomeric amides
chromatography on silica-gel (25% EtOAc–light petroleum as
eluant), to give firstly 9b, [α]D -60 (c, 1.2 in CHCl ), followed by
9
were separated by flash
3
9a , [α]D +21 (c, 1.4 in CHCl ).
3
(7) For reviews, see (a) Molander, G. A. Org. React. 1994, 46, 211.
(b) Molander, G. A.; Harris, C. R. in Encyclopedia of Reagents for
Organic Synthesis; Paquette, L. A. Ed.; John Wiley and Sons:
1995; Vol 6, p 4428–4432. (c) Molander, G. A.; Harris, C. R.
Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 307. (d) Kagan, H. B.; Namy, J. L.
Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 6573.
(8) Fuchs, J. R.; Mitchell, M. L.; Shabangi, M.; Flowers II, R. A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 8157.
(9) Although the ee of the amides 4 could not be determined
directly, we were able to establish the enantiomeric excess of
α-methylated derivatives (from reaction of either 4a or 4b) with
LDA in THF, followed by excess MeI by HPLC using a Chiralcel
i
OD® column (1% PrOH in hexane as eluant).
(10) The sequence starting from 4a gave 10 as shown, which was then
reduced to give 11, [α]D -10 (c, 1.8 in C H ), lit. value [α]D -11(c,
6
6
2.75 in C H ) for (S)-enantiomer, see Sacha, H.; Waldmuller, D.;
6
6
Braun, M. Chem. Ber. 1994, 127, 1959. Starting with 4b gave the
expected enantiocomplementary results.
The reductions have not been fully optimised, and it is clear from the
extended reaction time of at least twenty-four hours that is required that
this is not a particularly facile process. Nevertheless, the reaction seems
fairly general for different types of tertiary amide, and effects removal
of α-bromo, α-acetoxy and α-benzyloxy functions. In general we found
it necessary to add LiCl to the reactions, although entries 4–6 show that
(11) For other examples of α-deoxygenation, see (a) Naito, T.; Kojima,
N.; Miyata, O.; Ninomiya, I.; Inoue, M.; Doi, M. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1990, 1271 (Ca in NH ). (b) Hirose, N.; Sohda, S.;
3
Kuriyama, S.; Toyoshima, S. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1973, 21, 960
(Red-Al®).
debromination is rather more facile, and works well enough with SmI
(12) A very recent report describes the use of SmI to effect enamide
2
2
alone. Debromination of a secondary amide is facile (entry 6), but other
secondary amides gave either very poor yields of product (entry 9) or no
reduction at all (entry 10). In the latter case only the hydroxyamide
resulting from acetate hydrolysis was obtained (52%).
saturation; the product amide having α-oxygenation survived
intact, see Rigby, J. H.; Cavezza, A.; Heeg, M. J. J. Am. Chem.Soc.
1998, 120, 3664.
(13) Typical experimental procedure for amide reduction
A solution of LiCl (flame-dried in a round-bottomed flask under
vacuo before use) (2.76 mmol) in THF (2.8 ml) was added to a
In conclusion, we have uncovered a new type of amide reduction and
applied it to the preparation of highly enantiomerically enriched
atropisomeric amides. Further investigations of this type of
transformation, especially with cyclic amide systems, are planned.
solution of SmI , freshly prepared from Sm metal (152mg, 1.01
2
mol) and 1,2-diiodoethane (259 mg, 0.92 mmol). After 30 min a
solution of the starting amide (0.2 mmol) in THF (0.5ml) was
added and the reaction mixture stirred for 24h. Standard aqueous
work-up, followed by chromatography then gave the products in
the yields indicated.