Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
ment of a one-pot, redox-neutral palladium(II)-catalyzed
preparation of sulfinate derivatives from boronic acid sub-
strates. A phosphine-free catalyst allows the rapid conversion
of boronic acids into the corresponding sulfinates, and then
onwards to a variety of sulfones and sulfonamides (Sche-
me 1c).[15–17]
Initial investigations quickly revealed that the union of p-
tert-butylphenylboronic acid, DABSO, and tert-butyl bromo-
acetate could be achieved by the use of Pd(OAc)2 as the
catalyst with Et3N as the base in a 1,4-dioxane/MeOH solvent
mixture. The addition of TBAB resulted in a small increase in
yield, thus allowing isolation of the sulfone 1a in 83%
(Scheme 2a). A brief assessment of the scope of boronic acids
epoxides and O-hydroxylaminesulfonic acid. Such couplings
generally require water as a solvent.[18]
To achieve a more general process we were motivated to
pursue the proposed synthesis of sulfinate derivatives with
subsequent in situ trapping in a two-step format. We postu-
À
lated that the palladium sulfinate generated after Pd C SO2
insertion was responsible for the observed low reactivity with
simple electrophiles, and that a Lewis acid or ligand could aid
À
Pd O(S) bond cleavage to release an alternative metal
sulfinate and turnover the palladium(II) catalyst. While initial
attempts were unsuccessful, upon introducing a Brønsted acid
in the form of TFA into the reaction [p-tolylboronic acid with
DABSO and Pd(OAc)2, without Et3N], the sulfinic acid 2b
(for structure see Scheme 3) was observed in 75% yield
(HPLC). When performing the same transformation in the
absence of both TFA and Et3N, 2b was formed in 92% yield,
thus translating into a 88% yield of the sulfone 1b after base
treatment and alkylation (Scheme 3).
Scheme 3. Base-free, one-pot, two-step sulfone synthesis. Pd(OAc)2
(10 mol%).
With this key observation that the desired boronic acid
sulfination could be achieved by simple treatment with
Pd(OAc)2 and DABSO in a short reaction time (30 min),
further assessment of the reaction conditions revealed that
lower palladium(II) loadings could effect this transformation
and that MeOH was integral as a cosolvent (see the
Supporting Information for details). On examination of the
boronic acid scope of the reaction, using these optimized
reaction conditions, it was quickly established that varying the
electronics of the aryl boronic acid was detrimental to
reactivity. Substrates bearing p-fluoro and p-tert-butyl func-
tionalities resulted in immediate biphenyl and palladium(0)
formation. This side-reaction could be suppressed by employ-
ing TBAB as an additive in a low loading (0.25 equiv). A full
examination of the reaction scope was then conducted, and by
employing triethylamine and tert-butyl bromoacetate, as the
electrophilic trap, a range of sulfones could be accessed
(Table 1).[19] Substrates bearing electron-donating and elec-
tron-withdrawing groups, as well as ortho-, meta-, and para-
substitution patterns were all well tolerated in this system.
Pleasingly, sensitive functional groups such as phenol (1m),
amide (1n), amine (1p), and indole (1u) moieties were
compatible with sulfones obtained in good yields.
Scheme 2. Boronic acid and electrophile scope in the one-step
palladium(II)-catalyzed sulfone synthesis. Reaction conditions: Boronic
acid (0.25 mmol, 1 equiv), Pd(OAc)2 (10 mol%), DABSO (1 equiv),
Et3N (2 equiv), MeOH/1,4-dioxane (1:1) [0.16m], RX (0.75 mmol).
Isolated yields. [a] 1008C. TBAB=tetra-n-butylammonium bromide.
and electrophiles compatible with this one-pot, one-step
process was carried out (Scheme 2b). Aryl boronic acids
bearing electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substitu-
ents proved to be effective substrates (1a–e), and simple
heteroaromatic variants were also well tolerated (1 f).
Alkenyl boronic acids were found to be lower yielding (1g).
Aromatic BF3K salts were compatible with this system (1e).
In terms of suitable electrophiles, only activated alkyl halides
(1a,h–j) proved to be effective in this process with simple
alkyl halides affording none of the desired products (e.g.,
butyl bromide). A further limitation with this one-step
format, was that the solvent for the sulfinate functionalization
was confined to 1,4-dioxane/MeOH, thus resulting in the
incompatibility of more elaborate electrophiles such as
The incorporation of the methylthio-substituted boronic
acid (1l) promotes the use of this chemistry over traditional
sulfide oxidation strategies, where access to such mixed
oxidation-state S products would not be possible. Pleasingly,
a variety of heteroaromatic groups were well tolerated in this
reaction, with thiophene and furan substrates delivering the
corresponding products in acceptable yields (1 f and 1s),
while examples incorporating pyridine (1r), benzodioxane
748
ꢀ 2016 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 747 –750