Achiral Peptoid-Based Trimeric Sequences
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 120, No. 30, 1998 7427
Table 3. Expected Unique Interchain NOEs (distances smaller
than 4.5 Å) Based on the Model of Triple Helical (Pro-Hyp-Gly)10
and Observed “Interunit” NOEsa
were achieved fixing the backbone torsions (φ, ψ, and ω) at their
original values and searching energy minima in the ø1 (CR-N-Câ-
Cγ), ø2 (N-Câ-Cγ-Cδ) torsional space of the Nleu residues as it has
13
been done in our laboratories for (Gly-Pro-Nleu)n9 and (Gly-Nleu-Pro)n
exptl
NOEs
sequences. The ensemble interchain NOEs provide a critical test for
the modeled structures.
expected NOEs
interunit NOEs
Hyp CδH2-Pro CδH1
Hyp CR,γH-Pro CδH1
w
m
m
Hyp CR,γH-Nleu CâH
Hyp CδH-Nleu CâH
Hyp CδH-Nleu CγH n.r.
w
w
Syntheses of Trimeric Building Blocks. Boc-Gly-Pro-Hyp(OBzl)-
OH was synthesized by coupling Boc-Gly-Pro-OH37 with Hyp(OBzl)-
OBzl38 using EDC and HOBt as coupling reagents. Hydrolysis of Boc-
Gly-Pro-Hyp(OBzl)-OBzl with KOH, in THF/H2O (1:1, v/v) solution
afforded Boc-Gly-Pro-Hyp(OBzl)-OH.39
Pro CγH1-Hyp CR,γ
H
Pro CδH1-Hyp CâH1
Pro CδH1-Hyp CâH2
Pro CδH2-Hyp CâH2
n.d. Hyp CR,γH-Nleu CγH n.r.
n.d. Hyp CδH-Nleu CδH
n.d. Hyp CR,γH-Nleu CδH
Hyp CâH-Nleu CδH
s
s
m
Boc-Gly-Nleu-Nleu-OH19 was synthesized by coupling the peptoid
containing dimer Boc-Gly-Nleu-OH12 with Nleu-OEt40 using BOP as
the activating reagent to afford Boc-Gly-Nleu-Nleu-OEt. The trimer
was then saponified with KOH in H2O/THF (1:1, v/v) to give Boc-
Gly-Nleu-Nleu-OH. The detailed procedures for the synthesis of Boc-
Gly-Nleu-Nleu-OEt and Boc-Gly-Nleu-Nleu-OH are outlined below.
(A) Boc-Gly-Nleu-Nleu-OEt. A solution of Boc-Gly-Nleu-OH (26
g, 92 mmol) and HCl‚Nleu-OEt (18 g, 92 mmol) was cooled to 0 °C.
The coupling reagent, BOP (41 g, 92 mmol), was then added
portionwise to the solution, followed by the addition of triethylamine
(26 mL, 183 mmol). The ice bath was removed, and the solution was
left stirring overnight. The DMF was removed by rotary evaporation
under reduced pressure, and H2O (800 mL) and EtOAc (800 mL) were
added. The EtOAc layer was washed with H2O (800 mL), NaHCO3
(2 × 800 mL), brine (800 mL), 2 N NaHSO4 (2 × 800 mL), and brine
(3 × 800 mL). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4,
the volatiles were removed in vacuo, and the residue was purified by
flash chromatography (SiO2, 1/1, hexanes/EtOAc) to give 28 g (72%
yield) of Boc-Gly-Nleu-Nleu-OEt: Rf ) 0.2 (1/1 hexanes/EtOAc); 1H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.49 (br s, 1H), 4.22-4.01 (m, 8 H), 3.19-
3.06 (m, 4 H), 1.93-1.82 (m, 2 H), 1.40 (s, 9 H), 1.24 (t, 3 H) 0.85-
0.98 (m, 12 H).
Pro CRH-Nleu CâH
Pro CδH-Nleu CâH
w
w (only for the
KTA-analog)
Pro CRH-Nleu CγH
Pro CRH-Nleu CδH
Pro CδH-Nleu CδH
n.r.
s
w
a Connectivities which cannot be identified because of spectral
overlap are not included in the table. Observed NOEs are indicated
with w (weak), m (medium), and s (strong) based upon their intensities.
The hydrogens are named according to ref 33. NOE cross-peaks refer
to the Ac-(Gly-Pro-Hyp)3-(Gly-Nleu-Nleu)3-(Gly-Pro-Hyp)3-NH2 and
the KTA-[(Gly-Pro-Hyp)2-(Gly-Nleu-Nleu)2-(Gly-Pro-Hyp)2-NH2]3 un-
less otherwise indicated in parentheses. The n.d. stands for not
determined NOE. The n.r. stands for not well resolved for integration.
FAB-MS: m/z ) 430 (M + H) calcd for C21H39N3O6 + H 430,
obsd 430.
(B) Boc-Gly-Nleu-Nleu-OH. A solution of Boc-Gly-Nleu-Nleu-
OEt (4.7 g, 11 mmol), H2O (20 mL), and THF (20 mL) was cooled to
0 °C. KOH was dissolved in H2O (6 mL) and was then added slowly
to the solution. The ice bath was removed, and the solution was left
stirring at room temperature for 30 min. The THF was then removed
in vacuo, and the water was then cooled to 0 °C in an ice bath.
Concentrated HCl was added dropwise until the solution had a pH )
2. A white solid precipitated which was extracted with EtOAc. The
EtOAc extracts were washed with brine (3 × 30 mL) and then dried
over Na2SO4. After filtration, the solvent was removed in vacuo and
the residual solid was recrystallized from CH3CN to afford Boc-Gly-
Nleu-Nleu-OH (3.4 g, 78% yield): 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ
0.05-0.98 (m, 12 H), 1.42 (s, 9 H), 1.80-2.00 (m, 2 H), 3.10-3.19
(m, 4 H), 4.04-4.21 (m, 6 H), 5.73 (br s, 1 H).
MS-MALDI: m/z ) 402 calcd for C19H35N3O6 + H 402, obsd 402;
m/z ) 424 calcd for C19H35N3O6 + Na 424, obsd 424.
General Solid-Phase Synthetic Methods. Solid-phase segment
condensations were carried out using Boc synthetic strategies. The
MBHA resin‚HCl (200-400 mesh, 1% DVB, 0.45 mmol/g substitution,
0.2 mmol scale) was swollen in DCM for 1 h and washed with 10%
TEA in DCM (10 mL, 2×, 2 min) followed by DCM (10 mL, 4×). A
solution of 25% DMF in DCM was used as the solvent for the
couplings. DIC (2 equiv) and HOBt (2 equiv) were used as the coupling
reagents with either Boc-Gly-Pro-Hyp(OBzl)-OH (1.2-1.5 equiv) or
Boc-Gly-Nleu-Nleu-OH (1.2-1.5 equiv). The reactions were moni-
tored by the Kaiser ninhydrin test.20 After completion of each coupling
step, the solution was filtered and the resin was washed with MeOH
(10 mL, 5 min) and DCM (10 mL, 1 min, 4×). The N-terminal Boc
Figure 10. Central region of modeled triple helical structures of Ac-
(Gly-Pro-Hyp)3-(Gly-Nleu-Nleu)3-(Gly-Pro-Hyp)3-NH2. The two tri-
meric sequences (Gly-Pro-Hyp) and (Gly-Nleu-Nleu) are highlighted
in red and green, respectively. On the left side the backbone ribbon
diagram is shown for each of the three chains which are staggered by
one residue. On the right side enlarged views of the N-terminus (bottom)
and the C-terminus (top) of the (Gly-Nleu-Nleu)3 sequence are reported
showing the interchain proximities between Nleu and Hyp residues and
between Pro and Nleu residues.
(37) Wolfe, A.; Bowers, R. J.; Shin, H.-S.; Sohn, C.-K.; Weaver, D. F.;
Yang, K. Can. J. Chem. 1988, 66, 2751-2762.
(38) Rubini, E.; Gilon, C.; Selinger, Z.; Chorev, M. Tetrahedron 1986,
42, 6039-6045.
(39) Feng, Y. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, San Diego, CA,
1996.
and Hyp residues36 and therefore represents a good starting point as
backbone conformation for molecular modeling. Energy minimizations
(40) Kruijtzer, J. A. W.; Liskamp, R. M. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36,
6969-6972.
(36) Nemethy, G. Biochimie 1981, 63, 125-130.