Page 9 of 22
Green Chemistry
Please do not adjust margins
Journal Name
ARTICLE
identical to those of typical reaction procedures. The apparent
Catalysts characterisation
quantum yield (AQY) was calculated DaOsI: 1f0o.1ll0o3w9/:C5aGpCp0a17re26nBt
quantum yield = [(Mlight–Mdark)/Np] × 100%, where Mlight and
Mdark are the molecules of products formed under irradiation
and dark conditions respectively, M = mole number of the
reactant × conversion × 6.02 × 1023 (Alvarado constant). Np is
the number of photons involved in the reaction. Np = Etotal/E1,
Etotal (the total energy involved in the reaction irradiation) =
intensity × light spot area × reaction time, E1 (the energy of
one photon) = h × c / L (h is Planck constant, c is light speed, L
is wavelength of the LED light).
The morphology study of catalysts was carried out on a JEOL
2100 transmission electron microscopy (TEM) equipped with a
Gatan Orius SC1000 CCD camera, with an accelerating voltage
of 200 kV and nickel grids were used as the supporting film.
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging, elemental
mapping and EDX were performed using a ZEISS Sigma SEM at
accelerating voltages of 20 kV. Diffuse reflectance UV-visible
spectra of the sample catalysts were examined by a Varian
Cary 5000 spectrometer with BaSO4 as a reference. X-ray
photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data was acquired using a
Kratos Axis ULTRA X-ray Photoelectron Spectrometer
Acknowledgements
incorporating
a 165 mm hemispherical electron energy
We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the
Australian Research Council (ARC DP110104990 and
DP150102110). We also thank Arixin Bo and Mitchell De Bruyn
for the support of SEM and ICP analysis.
analyser. The incident radiation was Monochromatic Al Kα X-
rays (1486.6 eV) at 225W (15 kV, 15 ma). Narrow high-
resolution scans were run with 0.05 ev steps and 250 ms dwell
time. Base pressure in the analysis chamber was 1.0x10-9 torr
and during sample analysis 1.0x10-8 torr. X-ray diffraction (XRD)
patterns of the sample powders were collected using a Philips
PANalytical X’pert Pro diffractometer. Cu Kα radiation (λ=
1.5418 Å) and a fixed power source (40 kV and 40 mA) were
Notes and references
1
2
3
4
A. M. Tafesh and J. Weiguny, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 2035-
2052.
L. He, L.-C. Wang, H. Sun, J. Ni, Y. Cao, H.-Y. He and K.-N. Fan,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 9538-9541.
R. Mantha, K. E. Taylor, N. Biswas and J. K. Bewtra, Environ.
Sci. Tech., 2001, 35, 3231-3236.
A.-J. Wang, H.-Y. Cheng, B. Liang, N.-Q. Ren, D. Cui, N. Lin, B.
H. Kim and K. Rabaey, Environ. Sci. Tech., 2011, 45, 10186-
10193.
F. Figueras and B. Coq, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2001, 173,
223-230.
J. M. Joseph, H. Destaillats, H.-M. Hung and M. R. Hoffmann,
J. Phys. Chem. A, 2000, 104, 301-307.
S. S. Acharyya, S. Ghosh and R. Bal, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.,
used.
Inductively
coupled
plasma-atomic
emission
spectroscopic (ICP-AES) analysis was performed using a Perkin
Elmer 8300DV ICP fitted with an ESI SC-4DX auto-sampler and
PrepFAST
2 sample handling unit for online internal
standardisation and auto-dilution of samples and calibration
standards. Nitric acid, purified by sub-boiling distillation was
used for the preparation of all standards and blank solutions
used throughout the analysis.
5
6
7
8
9
Activity test
In a typical activity test, a 20 mL Pyrex glass tube was used as
the reaction vessel. The vessel containing reactants and
catalyst was irradiated with visible light using a halogen lamp
(from Nelson, wavelength in the range of 400−750 nm) under
magnetic stirring; the irradiance was measured to be 0.8
W/cm2. The reaction temperature was carefully controlled
with an air conditioner attached to the reaction chamber. The
reactions in the dark were conducted using an oil bath placed
above a magnetic stirrer to maintain the reaction temperature
the same to corresponding reactions with light illuminations;
reaction tubes were wrapped with aluminium foil to avoid
exposure to light. At given irradiation time intervals, 0.5 mL
aliquots were collected, the catalyst particulates was removed
by a Millipore filter (pore size 0.45 μm). The liquid−phase
products were analysed by gas chromatography (GC)
technique (Agilent 6890) with a HP−5 column to monitor the
change in the concentrations of reactants and products. An
Agilent HP5973 mass spectrometer was used to identify the
product.
2014, 2, 584-589.
A. Agrawal and P. G. Tratnyek, Environ. Sci. Tech., 1996, 30
,
153-160.
Y. Moglie, C. Vitale and G. Radivoy, Tetrahedron Lett., 2008,
49, 1828-1831.
10 K. Ohe, S. Uemura, N. Sugita, H. Masuda and T. Taga, J. Org.
Chem., 1989, 54, 4169-4174.
11 A. Roucoux, J. Schulz and H. Patin, Chem. Rev., 2002, 102
,
3757-3778.
12 A. Grirrane, A. Corma and H. García, Science, 2008, 322
,
1661-1664.
13 H. Zhu, X. Ke, X. Yang, S. Sarina and H. Liu, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed., 2010, 49, 9657-9661.
14 S. Sarina, H. Zhu, E. Jaatinen, Q. Xiao, H. Liu, J. Jia, C. Chen
and J. Zhao, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 5793-5801.
15 H. Zhu, X. Chen, Z. Zheng, X. Ke, E. Jaatinen, J. Zhao, C. Guo,
T. Xie and D. Wang, Chem. Commun., 2009, 48, 7524-7526.
16 S. Linic, U. Aslam, C. Boerigter and M. Morabito, Nat. Mater.,
2015, 14, 567-576.
17 J. C. Scaiano, K. G. Stamplecoskie and G. L. Hallett-Tapley,
Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 4798-4808.
18 H. Tada, T. Ishida, A. Takao and S. Ito, Langmuir, 2004, 20
,
7898-7900.
In action spectrum experiments, light emission diode (LED)
lamps (Tongyifang, Shenzhen, China) with wavelengths 360±5
nm, 400±5 nm, 470±5 nm, 530±5 nm, 590±5 nm and 620±5 nm
were used as light source. The reaction temperature was
controlled with oil bath with all the other reaction conditions
19 X. Chen, Z. Zheng, X. Ke, E. Jaatinen, T. Xie, D. Wang, C. Guo,
J. Zhao and H. Zhu, Green. Chem., 2010, 12, 414-419.
20 X. Guo, C. Hao, G. Jin, H.-Y. Zhu and X.-Y. Guo, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 1973-1977.
21 U. Sharma, P. Kumar, N. Kumar, V. Kumar and B. Singh, Adv.
Synth. Catal., 2010, 352, 1834-1840.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 9
Please do not adjust margins