1872
W. J. Moree et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 1869–1873
group to afford the 2,5-substituted benzamides provided
a 3- to 7-fold improvement in binding activity across the
series. The effect was most dramatic in compound 57 (2-
NH2,5-CF3) where a 7-fold improvement in binding
activity and functional activity over 1 was observed.
To add evidence that these compounds exerted their ef-
fects on THP-1 cells specifically through CCR2, com-
pound 57 was further evaluated in an [125I]-MCP-1
binding assay using HEK293 cells transfected with the
hCCR2b receptor. The observed binding IC50 of
45 nM was consistent with the binding IC50 observed
in the THP-1 cell line. The effect of compound 57 on
CCR1 was also measured using [125I]-MIP-1a and
THP-1 cells showing 25% inhibition at 1 lM
(IC50 > 1lM), indicating more than 50-fold selectivity
over the related chemokine receptor.
did not elicit a Ca2+ flux and therefore were not partial
agonists, but antagonists (data not shown).
In conclusion, high-throughput parallel synthesis al-
lowed us to rapidly explore the SAR of all three compo-
nents (R1 substituted benzyl group, R3 amino acid
spacer and R2 substituted benzamide) of the (R)-3-ami-
no pyrrolidine series 2 in a systematic fashion. Signifi-
cant improvements in binding affinity and functional
activity were achieved and compound 71 (binding IC50
3.2 nM, chemotaxis IC50 0.83 nM) showed a >60-fold
improvement over lead compound 1. The potent
CCR2b antagonists described herein will be useful in
the studies on the role of MCP-1 and CCR2 in diseases
where monocyte trafficking plays a role.
Acknowledgments
Re-optimization of R1 substitution on the benzyl group
in the presence of preferred amino acid spacer glycine
and 5-substituted 2-anthranilimides afforded extremely
potent CCR2b antagonists. Guided by the SAR devel-
oped in earlier compounds disclosed in Table 1, a num-
ber of para-substituted benzyl groups were examined
with the new anthranilamides. Not unexpectedly, the
most active compounds were found to contain the 5-tri-
fluoromethyl-2-anthranilamide for R2, which are listed
in Table 3. A relatively flat SAR was obtained for the
incorporation of a single electron-donating substituent
in the 4-position at R1 (Compounds 58–64, binding
IC50 11–42 nM). An improvement in activity could be
achieved by the incorporation of an additional elec-
tron-donating substituent in the 2- or 3- position of
the benzyl ring. Several of these 2,4- and 3,4-disubsti-
tuted compounds exhibited single-digit nanomolar bind-
ing affinity for the CCR2b receptor and potently
inhibited MCP-1-induced chemotaxis (Compounds 65–
72). Compound 71 was the most active compound in
this series and was a potent inhibitor of MCP-1 binding
(IC50 3.2 nM) as well as a sub-nanomolar inhibitor of
MCP-1 induced chemotaxis (IC50 0.83 nM).
The authors wish to acknowledge Dr. Erin Bradley and
Dr. David Spellmeyer for computational support on this
program, Dr. Dan Kassel, Dr. Lu Zeng and Ms. Xiaoli
Wang for their technical expertise in setting up systems
for mass triggered HPLC purification, Ms. Akiko
Takeuchi for her expertise on the Ca2+ flux inhibition
assay and Dr. Takeshi Hara and Dr. Seizi Kurozumi
for general support.
References and notes
1. (a) Rollins, B. J. Blood 1997, 90, 909; (b) Saunders, J.;
Tarby, C. M. Drug Discov. Today 1999, 4, 80; (c) Murphy, P.
M.; Baggiolini, M.; Charo, I. F.; Hebert, C. A.; Horuk, R.;
Matsushima, K.; Miller, L. H.; Oppenheim, J. J.; Power, C.
A. Pharmacol. Rev. 2000, 52, 145; (d) Horuk, R. Cytokine
Growth Factor Rev. 2001, 12, 313; (e) Carter, P. H. Curr.
Opin. Chem. Biol. 2002, 6, 510; (f) Schwarz, M. K.; Wells, T.
N. C. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2002, 1, 347; (g) Charo, I. F.;
Ransohoff, R. M. N. Eng. J. Med. 2006, 354, 610.
2. (a) Rollins, B. J.; Morrison, E. D.; Stiles, C. D. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1988, 85, 3738; (b) Charo, I. F.; Myers,
S. J.; Herman, A.; Franci, C.; Connolly, A. J.; Coughlin,
S. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994, 91, 2752.
3. Boring, L.; Gosling, J.; Chensue, S. W.; Kunkel, S. L.;
Farese, R. V., Jr.; Broxmeyer, H. E.; Charo, I. F. J. Clin.
Invest. 1997, 100, 2552.
4. Lu, B.; Rutledge, B. J.; Gu, L.; Fiorillo, J.; Lukacs, N. W.;
Kunkel, S. L.; North, R.; Gerard, C.; Rollins, B. J. J. Exp.
Med. 1998, 187, 601.
5. (a) Ogata, H.; Takeya, M.; Yoshimura, T.; Takagi, K.;
Takahashi, K. J. Pathol. 1997, 182, 106; (b) Gong, J.-H.;
Ratkay, L. G.; Waterfield, J. D.; Clark-Lewis, I. J. Exp.
Med. 1997, 186, 131.
Several compounds were chosen for further evaluation
in an additional functional assay: the MCP-1 induced
18
Ca2+ flux assay.
Inhibition of the release of Ca2+
was observed for all compounds tested and a close cor-
relation between the binding IC50 and the inhibition of
Ca2+ release was observed (see Table 4). Compounds
incubated with THP-1 cells in the absence of MCP-1
Table 4. MCP-1-Induced Ca2+ flux assay data for selected compounds
6. (a) Boring, L.; Gosling, J.; Cleary, M.; Charo, I. F. Nature
1998, 394, 894; (b) Dawson, T. C.; Kuziel, W. A.; Osahar,
T. A.; Maeda, N. Atherosclerosis 1999, 143, 205.
7. Lloyd, C. M.; Minto, A. W.; Dorf, M. E.; Proudfoot, A.;
Wells, T. N. C.; Salant, D. J.; Gutierrez-Ramos, J.-C. J.
Exp. Med. 1997, 185, 1371.
8. Kennedy, K. J.; Strieter, R. M.; Kunkel, S. L.; Lukacs, N.
W.; Karpus, W. J. J. Neuroimmunol. 1998, 92, 98.
9. For reviews see: (a) Carter, P. H.; Cherney, R. J.;
Mangion, I. K. In Ann. Rep. Med. Chem; Macor, J. E.,
Ed.; Academic Press: London, 2007; vol. 42, pp 211–227;
(b) Trivedi, B. K.; Low, J. E.; Carson, K.; LaRosa, G. J..
In Ann. Rep. Med. Chem; Doherty, A. M., Ed.; Academic
Compound
Binding
a
IC50 (nM)
Chemotaxis
a
IC50 (nM)
Ca2+ Flux
b
IC50 (nM)
19
25
58
61
71
116 (31)
226
26
12.4 (0.3)
5.5
3.6
64
365
23.1
5.3
7.5
11 (6)
3.2 (2.6)
0.89
0.83
a IC50 values were derived from dose response curves generated from
duplicate data points. Values with standard deviations (in paren-
theses) are means of at least three independent experiments.
b IC50 values are averages from dose response curves generated from
duplicate data points from two independent experiments.