2974 J ournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1999, Vol. 42, No. 15
Sanders and Seto
organic layer was washed with H2O, dried over MgSO4, and
concentrated under reduced pressure. Flash chromatography
(4:1 EtOAc/hexanes) afforded the Boc ketal 16A (0.44 g, 0.59
mmol, 78%). This compound appears in the NMR spectra as a
mixture of two conformational isomers: 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 0.75-0.99 (m, 6H), 1.06-1.36 (m, 34H), 2.27-2.32
(m, 1H), 2.62 (t, J ) 13.1 Hz, 1H), 2.75 (t, J ) 12.3 Hz, 1H),
2.87 (t, J ) 11.5 Hz, 1H), 2.97-3.17 (m, 5H), 3.46-4.03 (m,
6H), 4.56 (m, 0.5H), 4.97-5.30 (m, 1.5H), 6.90 (d, J ) 7.1 Hz,
1H), 7.17-7.31 (m, 5H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 11.9,
15.6, 15.77, 15.83, 25.0, 25.2, 25.3, 26.3, 26.8, 27.4, 27.5, 28.6,
28.7, 29.4, 30.4, 31.4, 37.8, 38.2, 40.4, 40.8, 41.2, 41.3, 45.3,
51.2, 51.3, 59.2, 63.3, 79.3, 79.9, 97.3, 98.3, 127.1, 128.7, 129.0,
129.7, 130.0, 130.1, 136.6, 137.0, 155.9, 170.3, 170.4, 173.0,
192.2, 201.5; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C39H64N4NaO8S
771.4166, found 771.4334 for a mixture of diastereomers 16A
and 16B.
Boc Keta l 16B. Compound 16B was prepared from 14B
(270 mg, 0.51 mmol), HOBT (68 mg, 0.51 mmol), EDC (130
mg, 0.67 mmol), Boc-D-Ile (120 mg, 0.51 mmol), and 4-meth-
ylmorpholine (0.11 mL, 1.0 mmol) in 20 mL of DMF using the
method described for the synthesis of 16A. The crude material
was purified by HPLC (1.5% MeOH/CH2Cl2 over 45 min) to
afford 16B (240 mg, 0.32 mmol, 63%). This compound appears
in the NMR spectra as a mixture of two conformational
isomers: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.67-1.07 (m, 6H),
1.32-1.48 (m, 26H), 1.62-1.79 (m, 2H), 1.91-2.03 (m, 2H),
2.44 (m, 1.5H), 2.76-3.49 (m, 8H), 3.66 (m, 0.5H), 3.80-4.05
(m, 4H), 4.57 (m, 1H), 4.92-5.29 (m, 3H), 6.48 (m, 0.5H), 6.65
(m, 0.5H), 7.18-7.30 (m, 5H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ
11.9, 12.1, 15.6, 15.8, 24.8, 24.9, 25.0, 25.36, 25.41, 26.5, 26.9,
27.4, 28.4, 28.7, 28.8, 28.9, 29.2, 30.1, 31.3, 31.6, 37.7, 38.2,
38.5, 40.6, 40.9, 44.8, 45.2, 50.7, 51.1, 53.8, 59.1, 59.2, 59.3,
59.4, 59.5, 63.0, 77. 7, 79.4, 80.0, 97.9, 98.2, 126.8, 127.4, 128.6,
128.9, 129.8, 129.9, 137.0, 138.0, 155.9, 171.1, 173.1; HRMS-
FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C39H64N4NaO8S 771.4166, found
771.4334 for a mixture of diastereomers 16A and 16B.
Boc Keta l 17A. Compound 17A was prepared from com-
pound 15A (110 mg, 0.32 mmol), HOBT (43 mg, 0.32 mmol),
EDC (80 mg, 0.42 mmol), Boc-D-Ile (74 mg, 0.32 mmol), and
4-methylmorpholine (0.070 mL, 0.64 mmol) in 15 mL of DMF
by the method described for the synthesis of 16A. The crude
material was purified by flash chromatography (4:1 EtOAc/
hexanes) to afford 17A (156 mg, 0.28 mmol, 88%): 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.80-0.95 (m, 7H), 1.24-1.44 (m, 10H),
1.60-1.81 (m, 6H), 2.46-2.59 (m, 3H), 2.82-3.13 (m, 3H),
3.76-4.01 (m, 5H), 4.44 (m, 1H), 4.73 (q, J ) 6.9 Hz, 1H), 5.01
(m, 1H), 6.58 (m, 2H), 7.19-7.32 (m, 5H); 13C NMR (100 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 11.9, 15.8, 24.9, 25.4, 28.7, 30.6, 31.9, 37.8, 38.6, 54.8,
59.6, 80.4, 96.3, 127.3, 129.0, 129.8, 136.8, 156.0, 170.4, 171.8;
HRMS-FAB (M + H+) calcd for C28H44N3O6S 550.2951, found
550.2961.
afford 53 mg (0.09 mmol, 99%) of inhibitor 1: 1H NMR (300
MHz, MeOH-d4) δ 1.31 (m, 10H), 1.67-1.83 (m, 10H), 2.92-
3.04 (m, 9H), 3.14 (m, 1H), 4.61 (dd, J ) 11.6, 5.3 Hz, 1H); 13
C
NMR (75 MHz, MeOH-d4) δ 24.9, 25.9, 26.06, 26.12, 26.3, 27.3,
28.1, 29.0, 39.5, 44.5, 53.0, 53.2, 69.9, 201.9.
In h ibitor 2A. The Boc ketal 16A (100 mg, 0.14 mmol) was
dissolved in 1 mL of a solution containing 92.5% TFA, 2.5%
TIS, 2.5% thioanisole, and 2.5% H2O. After 18 h the TFA was
removed under reduced pressure. The crude mixture was
purified by reverse-phase HPLC (0-50% MeCN/H2O over 45
min) affording 49 mg (0.068 mmol, 50%) of the inhibitor 2A:
1H NMR (300 MHz, MeOH-d4) δ 0.83-0.97 (m, 7H), 1.31-1.41
(m, 7H), 1.71-1.79 (m, 4H), 2.79-2.99 (m, 7H), 3.05-3.21 (m,
2H), 3.39-3.48 (m, 2H), 3.69 (d, J ) 5.5 Hz, 1H), 4.10 (dd, J
) 11.1, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 5.12 (dd, J ) 9.3, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 7.26-7.38
(m, 5H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, MeOH-d4) δ 12.0, 15.3, 25.4, 27.5,
27.6, 27.9, 28.0, 28.8, 28.9, 30.7, 32.3, 34.6, 38.1, 39.8, 41.0,
45.2, 50.8, 52.1, 52.8, 53.7, 54.2, 59.4, 61.3, 67.8, 128.7, 130.2,
130.3, 130.8, 131.1, 138.0, 138.2, 163.4, 169.5, 172.7, 190.3,
204.6; HRMS-FAB (M + H+) calcd for C26H43N4O3S 491.3056,
found 491.3067.
In h ibitor 2B. Inhibitor 2B was prepared from compound
16B (240 mg, 0.32 mmol) and 1 mL of the TFA solution
specified in the synthesis of 2A. The crude product was purified
by RPHPLC (0-50% MeCN/H2O over 45 min) to afford
inhibitor 2B (21 mg, 0.030 mmol, 9%): 1H NMR (300 MHz,
MeOH-d4) δ 0.52-0.82 (m, 7H), 1.06-1.12 (m, 1H), 1.19-1.36
(m, 5H), 1.49-1.64 (m, 5H), 2.64-2.85 (m, 6H), 2.91-2.98 (m,
1H), 3.08 (dd, J ) 14.5, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 4.93 (dd, J ) 10.2, 4.6
Hz, 1H), 7.00-7.24 (m, 5H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, MeOH-d4) δ
12.1, 15.2, 25.4, 27.6, 28.9, 31.0, 32.6, 38.2, 39.1, 41.0, 45.3,
50.8, 52.9, 59.4, 68.1, 128.6, 130.1, 130.5, 130.7, 138.5, 169.6,
173.1, 204.0; HRMS-ESI (M + H+) calcd for C26H43N4O3S
491.3056, found 491.3065.
In h ibitor 3A. Compound 17A (53 mg, 0.10 mmol) was
dissolved in 1 mL of a solution containing 92.5% TFA, 2.5%
TIS, 2.5% H2O, and 2.5% thioanisole. After 1 h the TFA was
removed under reduced pressure. The crude mixture was
purified by flash chromatography (10:89:1 MeOH/CH2Cl2/
concentrated NH4OH) before the final purification was per-
formed using RPHPLC (0-100% MeCN/H2O over 45 min)
affording the inhibitor 3A (17 mg, 0.03 mmol, 34%). In MeOH-
d4 solution, the inhibitor is visible as an approximate 1:1
mixture of hemiketal and ketone: 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOH-
d4) δ 0.70-0.78 (m, 7H), 1.15 (m, 1H), 1.65 (m, 1H), 1.83 (m,
0.5H), 1.99 (m, 0.5H), 2.17 (m, 0.5H), 2.38 (m, 0.5H), 2.59-
3.00 (m, 5H), 3.13 (ddd, J ) 13.2, 5.6, 2.8 Hz, 0.5H), 3.28 (m,
0.5H), 3.67 (m, 1H), 4.13 (m, 0.5H), 4.72 (dd, J ) 11.6, 4.8 Hz,
0.5H), 4.82 (dd, J ) 11.2, 7.2 Hz, 0.5H), 7.23-7.35 (m, 5H);
13C NMR (100 MHz, MeOH-d4) δ 10.7, 13.6, 24.0, 24.7, 25.0,
25.1, 30.45, 30.49, 34.7, 35.2, 36.7, 37.8, 38.0, 44.4, 64.99, 55.02,
58.00, 58.03, 59.8, 95.5, 96.2, 115.5 (q, J ) 284 Hz), 160.3 (q,
J ) 34 Hz), 168.3, 168.4, 172.4, 172.68, 172.71, 204.4; HRMS-
FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C20H29N3NaO3S 414.1827, found
414.1823.
In h ibitor 3B. Inhibitor 3B was prepared from compound
17B (60 mg, 0.11 mmol) and 1 mL of the TFA solution specified
in the synthesis of 3A. The crude product was purified by
RPHPLC (0-100% MeCN/H2O over 45 min) to afford inhibitor
3B (45 mg, 0.090 mmol, 82%). In MeOH-d4 solution, the
inhibitor is visible as an approximate 1:1 mixture of hemiketal
and ketone: 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOH-d4) δ 0.58-1.05 (m,
7H), 1.16-1.40 (m, 1H), 1.65-1.81 (m, 1H), 1.94-2.14 (m, 1H),
2.39-3.05 (m, 6H), 3.15-3.23 (m, 1H), 3.69 (d, J ) 5.2 Hz,
1H), 4.05-4.11 (m, 0.5H), 4.67 (dd, J ) 11.5, 5.3 Hz, 0.5H),
4.73 (dd, J ) 10.1, 5.8 Hz, 0.5H), 4.84 (dd, J ) 10.2, 5.2 Hz,
0.5H), 7.22-7.32 (m, 5H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, MeOH-d4) δ 14.2,
14.3, 27.7, 27.8, 28.5, 33.8, 34.0, 38.1, 38.8, 40.30, 40.33, 41.4,
41.7, 48.0, 58.5, 59.0, 61.5, 61.7, 63.6, 99.2, 130.6, 130.7, 132.2,
132.8, 140.6, 140.8, 172.0, 172.4, 175.6, 176.1, 207.9; HRMS-
FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C20H29N3NaO3S 414.1827, found
414.1834.
Boc Keta l 17B. Compound 17B was prepared from com-
pound 15B (106 mg, 0.32 mmol), HOBT (43 mg, 0.32 mmol),
EDC (78 mg, 0.41 mmol), Boc-D-Ile (73 mg, 0.32 mmol), and
4-methylmorpholine (0.070 mL, 0.64 mmol) in 15 mL of DMF
by the method described for the synthesis of 16A. The crude
material was purified by flash chromatography (4:1 EtOAc/
hexanes) to give compound 17B (148 mg, 0.27 mmol, 86%):
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.81-1.02 (m, 7H), 1.23-1.80
(m, 16H), 2.27-2.74 (m, 4H), 2.95-3.18 (m, 2H), 3.70-3.99
(m, 5H), 4.38 (s, 1H), 4.67 (q, J ) 8.2 Hz, 1H), 5.11 (m, 1H),
6.41 (m, 1H), 6.81 (d, J ) 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.20-7.31 (m, 5H); 13
C
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 12.0, 15.8, 24.9, 25.3, 28.7, 30.5,
32.0, 38.1, 38.8, 55.2, 59.5, 59.6, 80.3, 96.3, 127.4, 129.1, 129.7,
137.0, 156.0, 170.1, 171.7; HRMS-FAB (M + H+) calcd for
C
28H44N3O6S 550.2951, found 550.2953.
In h ibitor 1. Ketal 7 (53 mg, 0.09 mmol) was dissolved in a
solution of 5 mL of MeOH and 10 mL of 6 N HCl. The reaction
was heated at reflux for 1 h before the solvent was removed
under reduced pressure. The crude material was dissolved in
a small amount of MeOH to which Et2O was added until the
solution turned cloudy. The Et2O was pipetted off and the oily
residue further purified by RPHPLC (H2O with 0.1% TFA) to
Secon d a r y Am in e 19. Compound 19 was prepared from
18 (3.8 mL, 33.5 mmol), compound 10 (6.6 g, 30.5 mmol), and