Organic Letters
Letter
Chiral C5-substituted indoles are key building blocks in
many biologically active compounds, including the antitumor
alkaloid drug vinblastine,12 the haplophytine alkaloid,13
murrafoline D,14 the raputindole family,15 etc., and have
attracted a great deal of attention from synthetic chemists.
Most indole C5-functionalization reactions involve C−H
activation,2e,16 coupling,17 and semireduction18 strategies.
However, the dependency on directing groups and the
formation of achiral products are obvious drawbacks. Aniline,
which is always used as a nucleophile to react with
electrophiles due to its high electron density at the para
position,19 was successfully applied in the AAS reaction by Fu’s
research group (Scheme 1b).20 As a continuation of our
research interest in AAS reactions,21 herein we report the
highly stereoselective synthesis of C5-allylindoles through an
iridium-catalyzed AAS reaction of N-alkyl indolines with allylic
alcohols followed by an oxidation reaction in a one-pot
reaction (Scheme 1c). This method tolerates a broad range of
indolines and 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline analogues with
various functional groups. The transformation could be easily
scaled up to gram scale, and the formed products could be
applied in the synthesis of bioactive chiral C5-functionalized
indoles.
acid additives, it was found that the desired product could be
afforded in 71% yield and 99% ee in the presence of
(PhO)2POOH [entries 9 and 10 (for more details, see Table
S3)]. Further investigation of the equivalents of 2a, acid
additive, catalytic loading, and reaction concentration shows
that 3a could be achieved in 93% yield and >99% ee e by using
2 mol % [Ir(COD)Cl]2, 8 mol % (R)-L2, and 30 mol %
(PhO)2POOH in CH3CN (0.25 M) at room temperature for
12 h.
Notably, the methyl- and benzyl-protected indolines were
also successful in the reaction, giving the corresponding
products in excellent enantioselectivities; however, the yields
are lower (entries 12 and 13). Unfortunately, the indolines
with electron-withdrawing protecting group, such as acetyl,
Boc, alloc, and Ts groups, could not be promoted in the
reaction, probably due to the lower nucleophilicity of these
substrates (entry 14). Furthermore, the synthesis of C5-allylic
indole was tested, and 5 equiv of MnO2 was added after the
completion of the AAS process. Fortunately, desired C5-allylic
indole 4a was obtained in 72% yield without a loss of
enantiomeric purity (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2. One-Pot Synthesis of C5-Allylindole
We initially selected the AAS reaction of N-benzylindoline
(1a) with 1-(3-methoxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-ol (2a) as the
model substrate (Table 1). The combination of commercially
a
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions
To assess the generality of the C5-allylation of indolines, the
thus obtained optimal reaction conditions were first applied to
diverse substrates. Beyond the parent allylic alcohol, electroni-
cally diverse allylic alcohols substituted at the ortho, meta, or
para position of the aromatic ring each proceeded smoothly in
the AAS reaction, delivering the respective C5-regioselective
allylated products with good yields and stereoselectivities
(Figure 1). It was found that allylic alcohols bearing electron-
donating groups on the phenyl ring (3a−3e, 3g, and 3r−3u)
gave rise to the products in moderate to good yields (59−98%)
with excellent enantioselectivities (92% to >99% ee) in less
time than with electron-withdrawing substituents (3h−3q,
48−87% yields and 97% to >99% ee). In addition, the
synthetically important ester group and nitro group were
compatible in the reaction, providing the corresponding
products in excellent enantioselectivities (97% to >99% ee);
however, the yields were relatively lower. Furthermore,
heteroaromatic ring-substituted allylic alcohols were also well
tolerated, providing the desired products (3v and 3w) with
good results. When the naphthyl-substituted allylic alcohol was
used, the desired 3x was afforded in 94% yield and 99% ee.
Next, a broad range of N-Bn indolines were examined in the
AAS reaction followed by oxidation using MnO2 as the oxidant
(Figure 2). Indolines bearing electron-neutral and electron-
donating substituents, including methyl (4b−4e), phenyl (4f),
and methoxy (4g) groups at positions C2−C6, underwent
facile transformations and afforded the corresponding C5-
indole allylation products in excellent yields and enantiose-
lectivities. C2 and C3 disubstituted indoles (1g and 1h) also
delivered allylation/oxidation products 4g and 4h, respectively,
with good results.
b
c
entry
R
acid
solvent
yield (%)
ee (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Bn
BF3·Et2O
BF3·Et2O
BF3·Et2O
BF3·Et2O
BF3·Et2O
(PhO)2POOH
Sc(OTf)3
(PhO)2POOH
(PhO)2POOH
La(OTf)3
THF
DCM
Et2O
67
74
57
60
62
71
48
93
64
82
−
96
81
95
96
98
99
84
>99
>99
>99
−
Bn
Bn
Bn
Bn
Bn
Bn
Bn
toluene
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
d
e
f
g
9
Me
PMB
Ac
10
11
g
La(OTf)3
a
Reaction conditions: 2 mol % [Ir(COD)Cl]2, 8 mol % ligand, 20
mol % (PhO)2POOH, 0.2 mmol of 1a, and 0.4 mmol of 2a in solvent
at room temperature for 12 h. Isolated yields of 3a. Determined by
HPLC analysis on a chiral stationary phase. With 2.5 equiv of 2a.
With 30 mol % (PhO)2POOH. Reaction concentration of 0.25 M.
b
c
d
e
f
g
For 24 h.
available chiral phosphoramidite ligands [e.g., (R)-L2, (R)-L3,
and (R)-L4] with an iridium catalyst did not promote the
reaction (entries 2−4). In contract, a mixture of [Ir(COD)-
Cl]2/(R)-L1 and BF3·Et2O afforded the corresponding AAS
product 3a in 67% yield and 96% ee (entry 1). The reaction
could not proceed without acid. The solvent plays an
important role in the reaction, and CH3CN was found to be
the best, which gave rise to an ee value of 98% [entries 5−8
(for more details, see Table S2)]. Upon investigation of other
3427
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 3426−3431