654
Chavarin, Bernes, and Manero
`
side an anaerobic container under N2 atmosphere.
The resulting black solid was treated with a 30%
NaHCO3 solution to induce the formation of the salt
of the p-nitrobenzoic acid. The product was passed
through a column packed with silica. The resulting
80 fractions yielded 8.0 g of solid by slow evaporation
(25 days) which was recrystallized from hexane–ethyl
acetate (7.5:2.5), yielding 5.0 g (34% yield from the
picoline derivative) of a solid of constant melting
point and R ϭ 0.78. Yellow plate crystals, m.p. 119–
120ЊC. Found: C 70.5; H 5.4; N 10.8. Calc. for
C15H14N2O2: C 70.8; H 5.5; N 11.0. IR (CHCl3): 3020
(ArUH), 2971 (CUH), 1596 (CuN), 1343 (CUN),
hexane (R ϭ 0.46). Colorless irregular crystals, m.p.
145–146ЊC; MS (EI), 272 (Mϩ, C15H16O3N2), 122 (Mϩ-
150, C6H4NO2), 106 (Mϩ-166, C7H8N). IR (CHCl3):
3411 (C-O), 3017 (ArUH.), 2923 (CUH), 1715
(CuN), 1450, 1217 (OUH), 1373 (NUH), 1071
(NuO) cmϪ1. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): ͳ1.26 (t, 3H, CH3),
2.65 (q, 2H, CH2), 3.09 (m, 2H, CH2-C(H)OH), 5.24
(dd, 1H, CH), 6.45 (broad band, 1H, OH, exchange-
able with D2O), 7.01 (d, 2H, Ar.), 7.59 (dd, 2H, Ar.),
8.20 (d, 2H, HCuCNO2), 8.38 (s, 1H, NuCH).
Crystallography. Suitable single crystals of 1 and
2 were obtained by slow evaporation of solutions
(methanol for 1 and hexane for 2). The diffraction
data were collected at 293 K on a Siemens P4 diffrac-
tometer using graphite monochromatic MoUKͰ radi-
1
1110 (NuO), 972 (CuC) cmϪ1. H-NMR (CDCl3):
ͳ 1.25 (t, 3H, CH3), 2.66 (q, 2H, CH2), 7.30 (m, 2H,
Ar.), 7.51 (dd, 2H, HCuCH), 7.66 (m, 2H, Ar.), 8.19
(d, 2H, HCuCNO2), 8.46 (d, 1H, NuCH). TGA:
decomposition observed at 180.8ЊC.
5-Ethyl-2-(4-nitro-7-ol-styryl)-pyridine (2). The
same procedure as for 1 was followed, but the separa-
tion was performed using an Ͱ-Al2O3 column, taking
advantage of the alcohol’s stability in basic media. A
white solid was obtained (1.0 g, yield 6.4% from the
picoline derivative), which was recrystallized from
˚
ation ( ϭ 0.71073 A) and /2 scan mode with vari-
able scan speed. Pertinent crystal data and other
crystallographic parameters are listed in Table 1. In
the case of 2, the very thin plate habit of the crystal
prevented the collection of data at high resolution
˚
(max ϭ 21Њ, i.e., resolution of 1 A). In both cases, an
absorption correction was not considered necessary.
Data collection was carried out using XSCANS,6
while solution and refinements of the structures were
Table 1. Crystallographic data for 1 and 2
Compound
1
2
Chemical formula
CCDC deposit no.
Formula weight
Crystal size/mm
Crystal system
Space group
C15H14N2O2
CCDC-1003/5586
254.28
0.60, 0.20, 0.10
Triclinic
P1
6.9505(7)
7.418(1)
13.877(2)
105.14(1)
93.88(1)
105.89(1)
656.79(14)
2
C15H16N2O3
CCDC-1003/5587
272.30
0.60, 0.10, 0.05
Orthorhombic
Pcab
8.628(2)
10.405(2)
31.604(5)
90
˚
a/A
˚
b/A
˚
c/A
Ͱ/Њ
ͱ/Њ
Ͳ/Њ
90
90
3
˚
V/A
2837.3(11)
8
1.275
Z
Dcalc/g cmϪ3
1.286
0.09
Ȑ(Mo-KͰ)/mmϪ1
0.09
2 range for data collection/Њ
No. of collected data
No. of unique data
No. of data with F0 Ͼ 4(F0)
R1, wR2 [F0 Ͼ 4(F0)]/%
R1 , wR2 (all data)/%
S
3-56
3626
3-42
2098
2901 (Rint ϭ 1.81%)
1354
6.50, 16.49
13.94, 21.16
1.019
1528 (Rint ϭ 7.35%)
671
7.63, 15.73
19.47, 21.27
1.022
Data to parameters ratio
Largest and mean ⌬/
Largest peak and hole/e.A
2901/191
0.000, 0.000
0.13, Ϫ0.12
1528/185
0.000, 0.000
0.21, Ϫ0.16
3
˚