8324
B. Jiang, Y.-G. Si / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 8323–8325
Table 2. The alkynylation of carbonyl compound 1 via
ZnCl2 and Et3Na
Scheme 2.
low yield (10%) of an addition product was obtained.
This may be due to enolization of the aryl ketone in the
presence of the base, so that the alkynylation reaction
was inhibited. Using trifluoroacetylbenzene to avoid the
enolization led to the corresponding trifluoromethyl-
ated propargylic alcohol in good yield (entry 12). When
the phenylacetylene was changed to alkyl acetylenes,
such as cyclopropylacetylene or hindered t-butyl-
acetylene, propargylic alcohols were isolated in good
yields (entries 13 and 14). In particular, 4-chloro-2-tri-
fluoroacetylaniline underwent the addition reaction
with cyclopropylacetylene to furnish the corresponding
trifluoromethylated propargylic alcohol in 70% yield
(entry 15), which is a cost-effective process for the
preparation of a new class of potent non-nucleoside
reverse transcriptase inhibitors (Scheme 2).12,13
In conclusion, we have described an extensive study of
addition reactions to aldehydes and ketones by terminal
acetylenes utilizing inexpensive ZnCl2 as the promoter.
This simple and cost-effective process is attractive for
the chemical industry.
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the Shanghai
Municipal Committee of Science and Technology,
Shanghai Overseas Scholarship and the National Natu-
ral Science Foundation of China.
References
1. (a) Fried, J.; Lin, C.; Mehro, M.; Kao, W.; Dahren, P.
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1971, 180, 38; (b) Johnson, W. S.;
Brinkmeyer, R. S.; Kapoor, U. M.; Yarnell, T. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 8341; (c) Chan, K. K.; Cohen, N.
C.; Denoble, J. P.; Specian, A. C., Jr.; Saucy, G. J. Org.
Chem. 1976, 41, 3497.
a All the reactions were carried out with 1.0 molar equiv. of carbonyl
compound, 1.1 molar equiv. of acetylene, 1.5 molar equiv. of
zinc(II) salt, 1.5 molar equiv. of Et3N in toluene at 35°C for 10 h.
b Isolated yields.
c A 1:1 mixture of diastereomeric propargyl alcohols was isolated.
2. (a) Friedrich, K. In The Chemistry of Triple-bonded Func-
tional Groups, Supplement C; Patai, S.; Rappoport, Z.,
Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1983; Chapter 28;
(b) Brandsma, L.; Verkruijsse, H. D. Synthesis of
Acetylenes, Allenes and Cumulenes; Elsevier: Amsterdam,
1981.
3. (a) Brown, H. C.; Molander, G. A.; Singh, S. M.;
Racherla, U. S. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 1577; (b) Evans,
J. C.; Goralski, C. T.; Hasha, D. L. J. Org. Chem. 1992,
57, 2941.
compound (1.0 mmol) in neat form was added. The
results are summarized in Table 2. All aryl aldehydes
and alkyl aldehydes reacted with phenylacetylene
smoothly in good to high yields. Reaction of alkyl
acetylenes with aryl aldehydes gave moderate yields.
Aryl aldehydes with an electron-withdrawing group
afforded better yields than those with an electron-
donating group (entries 1–4). It is worth noting that
alkyl ketones underwent the same alkynylation reaction
under these mild conditions to give high yields of the
alkynylation products (entries 10 and 11). However,
when phenyl acetone was employed as substrate, only a
4. Ahn, J. H.; Joung, M. J.; Yoon, N. M. J. Org. Chem.
1995, 60, 6173.
5. Imamoto, T.; Sugiura, Y.; Takiyama, N. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1984, 25, 4233.