368
O. P. Shestak et al.
TABLE 2. Antimicrobial Activity of compounds Ia – Ih, XII, and
XIII
CH2), 4.17 (q, 2H, J 7.2 Hz, CH2CH3), 7.22 (s, 2H arom),
8.35 (bs, 1H, OH).
MIC 100, mg/ml
3,5-Dibromo-4-hydroxyphenylacetamide (VIII).
A
Com-
pound
mixture of 3.38 g (10 mmole) of ester VII, 49 mg (1 mmole)
of NaCN, and 30 ml of a 9 M solution of gaseous NH3 in an-
hydrous MeOH was heated in a stainless-steel hermetic am-
poule at 45°C for 45 h. Then the solvent was distilled off, the
residue was diluted with 50 ml of water, and the product was
extracted with EtOAc (3 ´ 15 ml). The extract was dried
over anhydrous Na2SO4, the solvent was distilled off, and the
residue was chromatographed on a SiO2 column eluted with
a hexane – acetone (1 : 2) mixture to obtain 3.03 g (98%) of
amide VIII; m.p., 182 – 184°C (reported m.p., 181 – 182°C
[7]); IR spectrum in KBr (nmax, cm – 1): 1548, 1650, 3166,
3208, 3401; 1H NMR spectrum in [(CD3)2CO] (d, ppm): 3.45
(s, 2H, CH2), 6.34 (bs, 1H, NH), 6.94 (bs, 1H, NH), 7.50 (s,
2H arom), 8.48 (bs, 1H, OH).
S.
E.
B.
P. aeru-
C.
E. coli
aureus faecium subtilis
ginosa albicans
Ia
Ib
Ic
Id
Ie
If
6.25 > 100 > 100 > 100 > 100 > 100
> 100 > 100 50.0
> 100 > 100 100.0
> 100
> 100
12.5
-²-
-²-
-²-
-²-
-²-
-²-
-²-
-²-
-²-
-²-
-²-
-²-
-²-
-²-
-²-
-²-
-²-
-²-
1.56
12.5
50.0
1.56
> 100 > 100 > 100
> 100 > 100 > 100 100.0
> 100 > 100 > 100 > 100
Ig
Ih
3.12
12.5
3.12
12.5
XII
> 100 > 100 25.0
> 100 > 100 1.56
> 100
50.0
XIII
Tetracy-
cline
0.78
3.12
0.39
3.12
0.39
0.195
3.12
0.78
6.25
3.12
-²-
-²-
-²-
-²-
-²-
-²-
A similar procedure using ester X yields 4-hydro-
xy-3,5-dichlorophenylacetamide (XI); yield, 93%; m.p.,
187 – 190°C; IR spectrum in KBr (nmax, cm – 1): 1564, 1654,
Strepto-
mycin
Oleando-
mycin
1
3192, 3210, 3406; H NMR spectrum in [(CD3)2CO] (d,
0.195 12.5
ppm): 3.46 (s, 2H, CH2), 6.36 (bs, 1H, NH), 6.97 (bs, 1H,
NH), 7.32 (s, 2H arom), 8.80 (bs, 1H, OH).
Amide oxidation by 100% HNO3. To a solution of
618 mg (2.0 mmole) of amide VIII in 3 ml of glacial acetic
acid cooled to 10°C was added in one take 5.3 ml of a mixtu-
re of 100% HNO3 and glacial acetic acid (1 : 9, v/v) cooled
to 10°C, and the solution was stirred at 10 – 15°C for 4.5 h.
Then 30 ml of water was added, the product was extracted
with EtOAc (3 ´ 10 ml), and the extract was dried over an-
hydrous Na2SO4. Finally, the solvent was distilled off and the
residue was chromatographed on a SiO2 column eluted with
a hexane – acetone (3 : 1) mixture to obtain 107 mg (20%) of
2,6-dibromo-4-hydroxy-4-carbamoylmethylcyclohexa-2,5-
dien-1-one (Id) (Table 1).
3,5-Dibromo-4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid methyl es-
ter (VI). A mixture of 620 mg (2.0 mmole) of acid IV, 15 ml
of MeOH, 40 ml of C6H6, and 0.1 ml of concentrated H2SO4
was kept boiling in a setup equipped with a Dean – Stark at-
tachment. Then the mixture was washed with of water
(3 ´ 10 ml) and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. Finally, the
solvent is distilled off to obtain 642 mg (99%) of ester VI;
m.p., 106 – 107°C (hexane); IR spectrum in CHCl3 (nmax
,
1
cm – 1): 1564, 1737, 3504; H NMR spectrum in CDCl3 (d,
ppm): 3.53 (s, 2H, CH2), 3.73 (s, 3H, COOMe), 7.40 (s,
2H arom), 8.49 (bs, 1H, OH).
Analogous procedures were used to obtain 2,6-dibro-
mo-4-hydroxy-4-hydroxycarbonylmethylcyclohexa-2,5-di-
en-1-one (1a) from acid IV (yield, 31%); 2,6-dibromo-4-hyd-
roxy-4-methoxycarbonylmethylcyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-one
(1b) from ester VI (yield, 67%); 2,6-dibromo-4-hydro-
xy-4-ethoxycarbonylmethylcyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-one (1c)
from ester VII (yield, 68%); 2,6-dichloro-4-hydroxy-4-hyd-
roxycarbonylmethylcyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-one (1d) from acid
V (yield, 25%); 2,6-dichloro-4-hydroxy-4-methoxycarbonyl-
methylcyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-one (1f) from ester IX (yield,
78%); 2,6-dichloro-4-hydroxy-4-ethoxycarbonylmethylcyc-
lohexa-2,5-dien-1-one (1g) from ester X (yield, 74%); and
2,6-dichloro-4-hydroxy-4-carbamoylmethylcyclohe-
A similar procedure using acid V was used for the synt-
hesis of 4-hydroxy-3,5-dichlorophenylacetic acid methyl es-
ter (IX); yield, 98%; m.p., 83 – 85°C (hexane); IR spectrum
1
in CHCl3 (nmax, cm – 1): 1578, 1736, 3524; H NMR spect-
rum in CDCl3 (d, ppm): 3.52 (s, 2H, CH2), 3.72 (s, 3H, COO-
Me), 7.20 (s, 2H arom), 8.36 (bs, 1H, OH).
A similar procedure using acid IV and EtOH instead of
MeOH gives 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid ethyl
ester (VII); yield, 98%); m.p., 105 – 106°C (hexane), repor-
ted m.p., 105°C [6]; IR spectrum in CHCl3 (nmax, cm – 1):
1
1566, 1730, 3506; H NMR spectrum in CDCl3 (d, ppm):
1.26 (t, 3H, J 7.2 Hz, CH2CH3), 3.52 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.17 (q,
2H, J 7.2 Hz, CH2CH3), 7.40 (s, 2H arom), 8.48 (bs, 1H,
OH).
A similar procedure using acid V and EtOH yields
4-hydroxy-3,5-dichlorophenylacetic acid ethyl ester (X);
yield, 97%; m.p., 75 – 76°C (hexane); IR spectrum in CHCl3
(nmax, cm – 1): 1587, 1728, 3527; 1H NMR spectrum in
CDCl3 (d, ppm): 1.27 (t, 3H, J 7.2 Hz, CH2CH3), 3.51 (s, 2H,
xa-2,5-dien-1-one (1h) from amide XI (yield, 35%).
Amide oxidation by Pb(OAc)4. Synthesis of compo-
unds XII and XIII. A mixture of 224 mg (0.725 mmole) of
amide VIII, 800 mg (1.8 mmole) of freshly prepared
Pb(OAc)4, and 2 ml of glacial acetic acid was stirred at room
temperature for 5 h. Then 15 ml of water was added and the
product was extracted with EtOAc (3 ´ 5 ml). The extract