signals gradually decreased at low temperatures, but their
hyperfine structure was unchanged, which suggests that the
bulky substituent serves as an efficient protective group for
spin-dimerization even at low temperature. Although it has not
yet been possible to grow single crystals suitable for X-ray
diffraction, unpaired p-electron density was delocalized over
both the coplanar benzene and the five-membered heterocycle.
Interestingly, the salt 2 undergoes one-electron oxidation to
give 1 quantitatively by treatment with 1 equiv. of NOBF4
(Scheme 2). Thus, the facile interconversion in the redox
reactions of 1 and 2 has been ascribed to the unusual
stabilization of the radical by the 7p electron framework.
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: i, Na (1.0 equiv), THF; ii, NOBF4 (1.0
equiv), THF–MeCN.
Notes and references
† Selected data for 1: yellow plates (CH2Cl2–n-hexane); mp 219–225 °C
(decomp.) (Found C, 59.41; H, 5.90. C22H27S2BF4 requires C, 59.73; H,
6.15%); nmax(KBr)/cm21 3449, 2959, 2871, 1593, 1458, 1431, 1380, 1084,
1035, 877, 761, 722; dH(400 MHz, CD3CN) 1.02 (d, 6H, J 6.7, o-CH3), 1.15
(d, J 6.7, 6H, o-CH3), 1.32 (d, J 6.9, 6H, p-CH3), 2.18 (sept, J 6.7, 1H, o-
CH), 3.06 (sept, J 6.9, 1H, p-CH), 7.39 (s, 2H, m-ArH), 7.85 (dd, J 8.5, 0.7,
1H, 4-ArH), 7.91 (ddd, J 8.6, 6.8, 0.7, 1H, 6-ArH), 8.30 (ddd, J 8.5, 6.8, 1.3,
1H, 5-ArH), 8.67 (d, J 8.6, 1.3, 1H, 7-ArH); dC(101 MHz, CD3CN) 24.0 (o-
CH3), 24.1 (o-CH3), 24.9 (p-CH3), 32.5 (o-CH), 35.3 (p-CH), 121.5, 123.6,
126.5, 129.8, 131.3, 138.9, 143.8, 150.0, 155.4, 163.7, 197.4 (3-C).
‡ Crystal data for 1: C22H27S2BF4•C6H6, M = 520.49, monoclinic, space
group C2/c (no. 15), a = 26.387(8), b = 13.177(7), c = 19.851(7) Å, b =
122.91(2)°, U = 5794(4) Å3, T = 293 K, Z = 8, Dc = 1.193 g cm23, m(Cu-
Fig. 2 VT-EPR spectra of 2 at (a) 18, (b) 250, (c) 281 °C, and (d)
simulated spectrum.
Ka)
= = 2192. A yellow prismatic crystal of
20.03 cm21, F(000)
dimensions 0.40 3 0.30 3 0.20 mm was used. 4659 reflections were
measured of which 4544 were unique using a Rigaku AFC7R diffractometer
with Cu-Ka radiation using w–2q scans. The structure was solved by direct
methods (SIR92) and expanded using Fourier techniques (DIRDIF94). The
non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. Hydrogen atoms were
included but not refined. All calculations were performed using the teXsan
crystallographic software package. The final cycle of full-matrix least-
squares refinement was based on 2083 observed reflections [I > 1.50s(I)]
and 316 variable parameters with R = 0.105, Rw = 0.151. CCDC 182/1370.
.cif format.
neutral radical even at room temperature. The novel dithiolyl
radical 2¶ was isolated in the one-electron reduction of 1 with
sodium metal in THF (Scheme 2). The structure of the first
isolable dithiolyl radical 2, a green solid, was determined by
high-resolution MS and EPR spectroscopy. The EPR spectra of
2 in THF solution showed the multiple signals (g = 2.0049 G)
attributable to a radical, and the aH values were evaluated by the
fitting of simulated spectra to the experiment spectrum (Fig. 2).
In addition, the experimental values of the unpaired p spin
density from the hyperfine splitting are in good agreement with
those calculated by the simple Hückel and McLachlan’s
methods (Table 1). Using variable-temperature EPR spectra
normalized by the Mn2+ on MgO standard, the intensities of the
§ Cyclic voltammograms of 1 (2.0 mmol dm23) were measured in MeCN
at 20 °C containing 0.1 mol dm23 NBu4ClO4 as a supporting electrolyte
using a glassy-carbon working electrode and Ag/0.01 mol dm23 AgNO3
couple in MeCN as a reference electrode; scan rate in the range from 50 to
500 mV s21
.
¶ Selected data for 2: green crystals (n-hexane); mp 76 °C (decomp.)
(Found: M+ 355.1565. C22H27S2 requires 355.1554); X-band EPR (THF)
Table 1 Unpaired spin populations (rp) of 2
g = 2.0049, aH1 = 0.461 mT, aH2 = 0.394 mT, aH3 = 0.123 mT, aH4
0.121 mT, aH5 = 0.065 mT.
=
1 S. Ogawa, T. Kikuchi, S. Niizuma and R. Sato, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1994, 1593; S. Ogawa, T. Kikuchi, A. Sasaki, S. Chida and R.
Sato, Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 35, 5469; S. Ogawa, S. Saito, T. Kikuchi,
Y. Kawai, S. Niizuma and R. Sato, Chem. Lett., 1995, 321; S. Ogawa, S.
Nobuta, R. Nakayama, Y. Kawai, S. Niizuma and R. Sato, Chem. Lett.,
1996, 757; S. Ogawa, T. Ohmiya, T. Kikuchi, Y. Kawai, S. Niizuma and
R. Sato, Heterocycles, 1995, 43, 321; D. Schröder, H. Schwarz, B.
Löbrecht, W. Koch and S. Ogawa, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 1998, 983.
2 C. T. Pedersen and C. Lohse, Tetrahedron Lett., 1972, 5213; K.
Bechgaard, V. D. Parker and C. T. Pedersen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1973, 95,
4373; C. T. Pedersen and C. Lohse, Acta Chem. Scand., Ser. B, 1975, 29,
831.
rp
Position Atom Exp.
Hückel
McLachlan
3 G. D. Figuly, C. K. Loop and J. C. Martin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 111,
645; E. Block, V. Eswarakrishnan, M. Gernon, G. Ofori-Okai, C. Saha,
K. Tang and J. Zubieta, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 111, 658; K. Smith,
C. M. Lindsay and G. J. Pritchard, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 111, 665.
4 B. B. Wayland, A. E. Sherry, G. Paszmik and A. G. Bunn, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1992, 114, 1673.
1
2
3
4
5
6
S
S
—
—
0.146
0.244
0.149
0.107
0.012
0.176
0.004
0.210
0.335
0.180
0.089
20.019
0.200
C
C
C
C
C
0.175
0.055
0.054
0.205
0.029
12,14
20.007
Communication 9/05276C
1892
Chem. Commun., 1999, 1891–1892