Letter
NJC
Table 1 Responsivity data for chemodosimeters X = NCH3, X = O and
X = S
trials also supported our proposed mechanism because addi-
tion of hydroxide reformed the original species.
The goal of this communication was to evaluate the ability
of the modular platform to produce oxophilic metal cation-
selective chemodosimeters. We have shown that X = NCH3,
X = O, and X = S relied on a revertible dehydroxylation
mechanism to form [X = NCH3]+, [X = O]+, and [X = S]+ in
CH3CN. Due to planarization and extended conjugation, these
new forms became both coloured and emissive in the visible
region. Selective, absorptive colouration in the presence of Al3+
or In3+ was best followed using X = NCH3 while the most
responsive, ratiometric emissive chemodosimeter was X = O.
Signal enhancement ranged from a moderate 40-fold increase
to an unprecedented 3000-fold for X = O. This platform meets
many key design criteria for effective chemodosimeters.
Exploiting the built-in modularity of the platform, our lab
continues to improve upon recognized shortcomings, such as
Eq. to
I/I0 in I/I0 in Abs. I/I0 in I/I0 in Em.
M+ a saturate Abs.b per M+ Eq. Em.b
per M+ Eq.
X = NCH3 Al3+
0.63
21.0
4.25
251
155
164
398
7
39
48
53
42
77
3
10
Zn2+
In3+
X = O
Al3+
Zn2+
In3+
10.0
618
1
657
62
2970
69
3230
297
1
162
50.0b
20.0
o1
33
X = S
Al3+
20.0
151
1
372
8
61
1
73
3
Zn2+
50.0b
o1
o1
In3+ 220
2
o1
Na+, Li+ and (Bu)4N+ are excluded for clarity as all responses are E1
(ESI). Data available in graphical form in Fig. S31 (ESI).
a
b
chemodosimeters are used frequently in the literature to water-intolerance, by appending mesomeric electron-donating
compare different systems even though concentrations range groups. The findings will be presented in due course.
from 1 mM to 50 mM, which report enhancements from 32 to
582-fold.11,16,19 Given these comparator enhancement ratios,
our chemodosimeters relate favourably with literature.
Conflicts of interest
When measuring emission in Fig. 3b, X = O is the most
There are no conflicts to declare.
responsive. It is over 4Â more responsive to Al3+ and In3+ than
X = NCH3 and over 100Â more than X = S because the ff is
greater (0.63 vs. 0.05). Xanthenol derivative, X = O, is also over
Notes and references
300Â more responsive to Al3+ than Na+, Li+ and (Bu)4N+
although it has a slight turn-on for Zn2+ (Table 1). Thioxanthenol
derivative X = S is the least responsive emission chemodosimeter
because 20 equivalents of Al3+ and 220 equivalents of In3+ are
needed to reach saturation. The enhancement ratio in Table 1 of
the X = S and X = NCH3 emission is poorer than that for
absorption, perhaps due to low ff. However, for X = O the
enhancement ratio is much greater at about 3000-fold, which
is superior to literature reports in our concentration range.11,16,19
All three chemodosimeters are more selective for oxophilic metal
cations Al3+ and In3+, and X = NCH3 is more responsive in
absorption measurements while X = O is more responsive for
emission.
1 T. P. Flaten, Brain Res. Bull., 2001, 55, 187.
2 E. Hirsch, J. P. Brandel, P. Galle, F. Javoy-Agid and Y. Agid,
J. Neurochem., 1991, 56, 446–451.
3 F. P. Castronovo and H. N. Wagner, Br. J. Exp. Pathol., 1971,
52, 543–559.
4 J. F. Ma, P. R. Ryan and E. Delhaize, Trends Plant Sci., 2001,
6, 273–278.
5 D.-G. Cho and J. L. Sessler, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 1647.
6 D. T. Quang and J. S. Kim, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 6280–6301.
7 Y. Yang, Q. Zhao, W. Feng and F. Li, Chem. Rev., 2013, 113,
192–270.
8 J. Chan, S. C. Dodani and C. J. Chang, Nat. Chem., 2012, 4,
973–984.
9 D. T. Hogan and T. C. Sutherland, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2018,
9, 2825–2829.
The bulk of literature on chemodosimeters use complex
reactions that irrevocably change the system.20–22 Our platform
relies simply on removal of a masking hydroxyl group – a
´
´˜
transformation that could be reverted in the proper conditions 10 M. Lo Presti, S. El Sayed, R. Martınez-Manez, A. M. Costero,
´
to regenerate the original chemodosimeter. Regeneration holds
promise for re-usable assays and has therefore been built into
S. Gil, M. Parra and F. Sancenon, New J. Chem., 2016, 40,
9042–9045.
chemodosimeters for other analytes,17,23 but only rarely for 11 M. Alaparthi, K. Mariappan, E. Dufek, M. Hoffman and
metal cations.15,24 Regeneration trials were conducted by satur-
ating X = NCH3, X = O, and X = S with ample Al3+ and then 12 E. E. Nekongo, P. Bagchi, C. J. Fahrni and V. V. Popik,
adding (CH3)4NOH and following spectral evolution by UV-vis Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10, 9214.
absorption spectroscopy. The hydroxide competed for both 13 S. A. Jonker, F. Ariese and J. W. Verhoeven, Recl. Trav. Chim.
metal and organic cations in solution, so excess hydroxide Pays-Bas, 2010, 108, 109–115.
was required to regenerate the original tertiary alcohols. 14 J. M. Bedlek, M. R. Valentino and M. K. Boyd, J. Photochem.
Fig. S61–S63 (ESI†) show the absorption bands for [X = NCH3]+,
Photobiol., A, 1996, 94, 7–13.
[X = O]+, and [X = S]+ decrease as the bands for X = NCH3, X = O, 15 Y. Yang, F. Huo, C. Yin, A. Zheng, J. Chao, Y. Li, Z. Nie,
A. G. Sykes, RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 11295–11302.
´
´˜
and X = S increase to saturation. Besides proving that this
platform can be used for regenerable chemodosimeters, the
R. Martınez-Manez and D. Liu, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2013,
47, 300–306.
New J. Chem.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2018