J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10221-10222
10221
Scheme 1
Nickel-Catalyzed Carbostannylation of Alkynes with
Allyl-, Acyl-, and Alkynylstannanes: Stereoselective
Synthesis of Trisubstituted Vinylstannanes
Eiji Shirakawa,*,† Kenji Yamasaki,‡ Hiroto Yoshida,‡ and
Tamejiro Hiyama*,‡
Graduate School of Materials Science
Japan AdVanced Institute of Science and Technology
Asahidai, Tatsunokuchi, Ishikawa 923-1292, Japan
Department of Material Chemistry
Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto UniVersity
Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
Table 1. Nickel-Catalyzed Carbostannylation of 1-Octyne (2a)
with Allyl(tributyl)tin (1a)a
ReceiVed July 22, 1999
conv
conv
Carbostannylation of internal alkynes should be one of the most
useful tools for stereoselective synthesis of olefins, since the
resulting trisubstituted vinylstannanes are readily converted into
various tetrasubstituted ethenes via various synthetic transforma-
tions.1 There have been, however, only a limited number of reports
on this synthesis subject.1b,2 Although Yamamoto and co-workers
have reported that allylstannanes add to terminal alkynes with
anti-selectivity when a Lewis acid catalyst is used, available
alkynes are limited to terminal ones.3 Anti-selective allylstannyl-
ation of alkynes is found also by Hosomi and co-workers and is
mediated by such a radical initiator as AIBN to give a mixture
of stereo- and regioisomers, the internal alkynes being restricted
to relatively electron-deficient ones.4 On the other hand, the
palladium-catalyzed alkynylstannylation of alkynes proceeds with
exclusive syn-selectivity and acceptable regioselectivity.5,6 How-
ever, the scope of the reaction is limited to alkynylstannanes and
relatively electron-deficient alkynes. Herein we report that the
nickel-catalyzed carbostannylation of alkynes has following superb
features: (1) a nickel(0) complex mediates the reaction of even
relatively electron-rich internal alkynes, (2) the reaction is
applicable not only to alkynylstannanes but also to acyl- and
allylstannanes, (3) syn-selectivity results also in allylstannylation
of alkynes, and (4) regioselectivities are much higher than the
palladium-catalyzed alkynylstannylation.
The catalytic activity of various nickel complexes was first
examined for the reaction of allyl(tributyl)tin (1a, R1 ) R2 ) H)
with 1-octyne (2a, R3 ) hexyl, R4 ) H) (Scheme 1). The
conversion of 1a and the ratio of carbostannylation products 3a
and 4a were readily monitored by 119Sn NMR; the results obtained
from the reaction carried out at 80 °C for 1 h are summarized in
Table 1. As can be readily seen, reaction with 5 mol % of bis-
(1,5-cyclooctadiene)nickel(0), Ni(cod)2, in toluene gave a 68:32
mixture of 3a and 4a in 85% conversion (entry 1).7 Polar solvents
accelerated the reaction at the slight expense of regioselectivity
(entries 2-4). Octane or pyridine as a solvent retarded the reaction
(entries 5 and 6). Use of triphenylphosphine (10 mol %) or
entry solvent (%)b 3a:4ab entry
solvent
(%)b 3a:4ab
1
2
3
toluene 85
68:32
58:42
60:40
4
5
6
1,4-dioxane 85
65:35
58:42
60:40
DMF
DME
92
91
octane
pyridine
70
20
a The reaction was carried out in a solvent (0.3 mL) at 80 °C using
allyl(tributyl)tin (0.46 mmol) and 1-octyne (1.38 mmol) for 1 h in the
presence of Ni(cod)2 (23 µmol). b Determined by 119Sn NMR.
Table 2. Nickel-Catalyzed Allylstannylation of Alkynesa
temp time yield
entry allylstannane alkyne (°C) (h) (%)b product(s) 3:4c
1
2d
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1a
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
2g
2h
2i
80
80 14
80
100 12
100 12
100 14
100 40
100 14
5
93
80
0.5 77
3a, 4a
3b
64:36
-
-
3c
78
77
76
78
64
70
64
87
3d, 4d
3e
65:35
>99:1
>99:1
>99:1
>99:1
>99:1
>99:1
-
3f
3g
3h
100
100 14
80
8
3i
10
11
1b
1c
2e
2c
3j
3
3k
a The reaction was carried out in toluene (0.3 mL) using an
organostannane (0.46 mmol), an alkyne (1.38 mmol), and Ni(cod)2 (23
µmol). b Isolated yield based on the organostannane. c Determined by
119Sn NMR. d The reaction was carried out under an acetylene
atmosphere (1 atm).
N-(2-diphenylphosphinobenzylidene)-2-phenylethylamine (5)
(5 mol %), an efficient ligand for the palladium-catalyzed
alkynylstannylation of alkynes,5 inhibited the reaction.
The allylstannylation of various alkynes with Ni(cod)2 catalyst
was next studied in toluene (Scheme 1 and Table 2). Whereas
acetylene (2b) also reacted with 1a in good yield (entry 2),
phenylacetylene and ethyl propiolate did not give significant
amounts of carbostannylation products due to competitive self-
polymerization of the alkynes. In contrast, internal alkynes gave
good yields of the corresponding carbostannylation products,
irrespective of electron-withdrawing or -donating character of
substituent R3 and/or R4 (entries 3-9). Furthermore, a single
† Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology.
‡ Kyoto University.
(1) (a) Farina, V.; Krishnamurthy, V.; Scott, W. J. Org. React. 1997, 50,
1-652. (b) Davies, A. G. Organotin Chemistry; VCH: Weinheim, 1997. (c)
Pereyre, M.; Quintard, J.-P.; Rahm, A. Tin in Organic Synthesis; Butter-
worth: London, 1987.
(7) Configuration of the carbostannylation products was determined by
NMR studies (coupling constants and NOE) of the alkenylstannanes and/or
the alkenes obtained by protonolysis. For example, the stereochemistry of 3a
and 4a was determined on the basis of NOE (irradiation at the methine peak)
and the H-Sn coupling constant, as shown below. For the coupling constants
between tin and olefinic protons in alkenylstannanes, see: Leusink, A. J.;
Budding, H. A.; Marsman, J. W. J. Organomet. Chem. 1967, 9, 285-294.
(2) Multistep synthesis of trisubstituted vinylstannanes has been reported.
Wang, K. K.; Chu, K.-H.; Lin, Y.; Chen, J.-H. Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 1105-
1118.
(3) Asao, N.; Matsukawa, Y.; Yamamoto, Y. Chem. Commun. 1996, 1513-
1514.
(4) Miura, K.; Itoh, D.; Hondo, T.; Saito, H.; Ito, H.; Hosomi, A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 8539-8542.
(5) Shirakawa, E.; Yoshida, H.; Kurahashi, T.; Nakao, Y.; Hiyama, T. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 2975-2976.
(6) Depending on the ligand, the palladium-catalyzed carbostannylation is
accompanied by dimerization of alkynes. Shirakawa, E.; Yoshida, H.; Nakao,
Y.; Hiyama, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4290-4291.
10.1021/ja992597s CCC: $18.00 © 1999 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 10/16/1999