J. J. Matasi et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 1333–1336
1335
Table 3. Optimization of substituents at position 8 (ring B)
and moderate selectivity. With this knowledge, we direc-
ted our efforts around the 8-methyl derivative.
NH2
N
N
The SAR of the modifications of ring A is summarized
in Table 2. These results showed that the replacement
of phenyl with furan or substituted furans is well toler-
ated by the A2A adenosine receptor. There is a moderate
to significant improvement in selectivity for these deriv-
atives. Among these, the 2-furanmethanol derivative,
compound 19 was identified to be the most potent A2A
adenosine receptor antagonist with almost 100-fold
selectivity over the A1 receptor. The 2- or 4-pyridyl
derivatives (20 and 21) exhibited a significant drop in
A2A receptor affinity. These results suggested that the
furan was a favorable substitute for the phenyl. We fo-
cused on the 5-bromo-2-furnyl derivative 18 for further
SAR since A2A receptor affinities were similar for all furan
derivatives.
O
Br
R
Compound
R
A2A Ki (nM)
A1/A2A
22
23
–C6H5
–C(CH3)3
10.9
8.1
68
26
24
3.9
32
N
25
26
27
28
29
–Cl
1.0
0.8
4.2
1.6
2.6
70
103
49
–CH(CH3)2
–CH3
–OCH3
21
42
–CH2CH3
A2A receptor antagonists. Compared to our initial non-
selective lead 1, several compounds in this series with
moderate to high selectivity were identified. In particu-
lar, compounds 19 and 26 show very high affinity
(Ki = 2.6, 0.8 nM, respectively) with approximately
100-fold selectivity over A1 receptor.
The A2A adenosine receptor affinities for derivatives of
the modified ring B are presented in Table 3. These re-
sults showed that the introduction of substituents at
the 8-position is well tolerated by the A2A adenosine
receptor and can be substituted with a variety of susbti-
tuents. There is no significant increase in selectivity over
A1 receptor for these derivatives when compared with
compound 18. Compound 26 was found to have higher
affinity for A2A adenosine receptor and slightly im-
proved selectivity. The selectivity against A2B and A3
adenosine receptors was not determined. This current
class of compounds does not contain purine as a tem-
plate, which makes them structurally different than
known class14 of A2A adenosine receptor antagonists
in the literature namely SCH-58261 and ZM-241385.
Acknowledgements
We would also like to thank Dr. William Greenlee for
his support for this work. Finally, we would like to
thank Zheng Tan for her help in the preparation of this
manuscript.
References and notes
1. Fredholm, B. B.; Abbracchio, M. P.; Burnstock, G.; Daly,
J. W.; Harden, T. K.; Jacobson, K. A.; Legg, P.; Williams,
M. Pharmacol. Rev. 1994, 46, 143.
In summary, 4-aryl-5H-indeno[1,2-d]pyrimidin-2-yl-
amine derivatives were identified as a novel class of
2. (a) Svenningsson, P.; Le Moine, C.; Fisone, G.; Fredholm,
B. B. Prog. Neurobiol. 1999, 59, 355; (b) Schiffmann, S. N.;
Libert, F.; Vassart, G.; Dumont, J. E.; Vanderhaeghen,
J. J. Brain Res. 1990, 519, 333.
3. (a) Ochi, M.; Koga, K.; Kurokawa, M.; Kase, H.;
Nakamura, J.; Kuwana, Y. Neuroscience 2000, 100, 53;
(b) Mori, A.; Shindou, T.; Ichimura, M.; Nonka, H.;
Kase, H. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16, 605.
4. Kuwana, Y.; Shiozaki, S.; Kanda, T.; Kurokawa, M.;
Koga, K.; Ochi, M.; Ikeda, K.; Kase, H.; Jackson, M. J.;
Smith, L. A.; Pearce, R. K. B.; Jenner, P. Adv. Neurol.
1999, 80, 121.
5. (a) Shiozaki, S.; Ichikawa, S.; Nakamura, J.; Kitamura, S.;
Yamada, K.; Kuwana, Y. Psychopharmacology 1999, 147,
90; (b) Shiozaki, S.; Ichikawa, S.; Nakamura, J.; Kuwana,
Y. In Effects of Adenosine Receptors, in Adenosine Recep-
tors and Parkinson’s Disease; Kase, H., Richardson, P. J.,
Jenner, P., Eds.; Academic, 1999; 193–210.
6. Aoyama, S.; Kase, H.; Borreli, E. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20,
5848.
7. Kanda, T.; Jackson, M. J.; Smith, L. A.; Pearce, R. K. B.;
Nakamura, J.; Kase, H.; Kuwana, Y.; Jenner, P. Exp.
Neurol. 2000, 162, 321.
8. (a) Baraldi, P. G.; Cacciari, B.; Romagnoli, R.; Spalluto,
G.; Monopoli, A.; Ongini, E.; Varani, K.; Borea, P. A.
J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 101; (b) Baraldi, P. G.; Cacciari,
B.; Spalluto, G.; Bergonzoni, M.; Dionosotti, S.; Ongini,
E.; Varani, K.; Borea, P. A. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 2126.
Table 2. Optimization of substituents at position 4 (ring A)
NH2
N
N
R
Compound
R
A2A Ki (nM)
A1/A2A
9
15
11
O
O
16
17
18
19
20
21
6.7
7.1
29.4
25.7
48.8
94.1
5.5
O
O
4.2
Br
2.6
OH
154.2
56.9
N
9.0
N