oisomer regardless the stereochemistry of the carbinol
propargylic center (entries 1 and 2).9 Even when the R2
substituent was a phenyl group, the reduction provided only
one stereoisomer (entry 3). These products represent com-
pounds in which the chirality of the γ-carbon has been
completely transferred to the sec-position relatiVe to the
acetylene. When the R2 increased the steric influence
(isopropyl group), a tiny amount of 4d was isolated (entry
4). The reaction lacks stereoselectivity when R2 is a tert-
butyl group. These facts are consistent with our previously
reported mechanism based on a hydride transfer of one
benzylic proton to the propargylic carbocation (Scheme 3).4
Scheme 2. Synthesis of γ-Benzyl Protected R,â-Propargylic
Alcohols
Scheme 3. Proposed Mechanism for the Stereoselective
were regioselectively opened to the corresponding 1,3-diols.
Benzylidene protection and regioselective reduction provided
the secondary benzyl ether. Oxidation of the primary alcohol
furnished the aldehyde 6, which was treated with a suitable
Grignard reagent to yield the secondary alcohols 7. Oxidation
to the corresponding ketone and lithium acetylide addition
provided 1 as a mixture of diastereoisomers.6
Hydride Transfer to Co2(CO)6-Propargylic Cations
The Co2(CO)6-acetylenic complex 2 was obtained by
simple treatment of 1 with Co2(CO)8 in a CH2Cl2 solution.
The addition of 1 equiv of BF3‚OEt2 to a CH2Cl2 solution
of the Co2(CO)6-acetylenic complex 2, at -20 °C, provided
within minutes the corresponding complexed bishomopro-
pargylic alcohol in a straightforward manner.7 In all cases,
the Co2(CO)6-bishomopropargylic alcohols were satisfactorily
demetalized in the standard manner (Ce(NO3)6(NH4)2, ac-
etone, 0 °C) to obtain the free acetylenes. Representative
examples with different R2 groups are outlined in Table 1.8
The chairlike transition state locates the bulkiest group in a
pseudoequatorial position. The cobalt complex substituent
is such a group when R2 is not highly demanding from a
steric viewpoint. However, when the size of R2 was very
large, as occurred, for example, with a tert-butyl group,
competition between the group and the complexed acetylene
led to poor selectivity.
To establish the stereochemistry of the newly created
stereocenter, we envisioned the possibility of transforming
3 into a 3,5-disubstituted γ-lactone. Thus, 3 was selectively
hydrogenated to the cis-olefin 8 that after acetylation and
cleavage of the olefin afforded the corresponding carboxylic
acid. Alkaline hydrolysis of the acetate group and further
acid treatment afforded in excellent yield the corresponding
γ-lactone (Table 2). The methodology was quite general,
except for the case for R2 ) phenyl, in which we had to
cleave the double bond via the formation of the correspond-
ing cis-diol (OsO4, NMO) and further oxidative fragmenta-
tion (KMnO4, K2CO3, NaIO4). The cis relationship between
Table 1. Stereoselective Intramolecular Propargylic Reduction
in γ-Benzyl-Protected Co2(CO)6-R,γ-Acetylenic Diols under
Lewis Acid Treatment
entry
2 (R1 ) C13H27-n, R3 ) C5H11-n)
3:4
(yield, %)a
1
2
3
4
5
2a , R2 ) CH3
2b, R2 ) C5H11-n
2c, R2 ) Ph
100:0
100:0
100:0
30:1
89 (79)
86 (82)
87 (84)
81 (72)
79 (70)
2d , R2 ) Pr-i
2e, R2 ) Bu-t
1:1
a Yields are not optimized (the overall yield from 1 to 3 + 4 is given in
parentheses).
As can be seen from Table 1, the configuration of the
stereogenic center in which the benzyl-protected group was
located remains unaffected. However, the most interesting
feature of our process was that the reduction of a tertiary
propargylic alcohol, when the R2 is not very bulky, provided
the corresponding sec-dialkyl acetylene as a sole diastere-
(6) The propargylic alcohol is usually obtained as a mixture in which
one of the diastereoisomers slightly predominates (ca. 1.5:1).
(7) Blank experiments performing the acidic treatment over 1 gave
inseparable mixtures, and in any case, traces of 3 were detected.
(8) In our previous work, we have shown that the propargylic reduction
is compatible with a broad kind of functional group.
(9) We have performed the reaction with both diastereoisomers of 2b
leading to 3b as the sole isolated product.
(10) Prepared by the method shown in: Rodr´ıguez, C. M.; Mart´ın, T.;
Ram´ırez, M. A.; Mart´ın, V. S. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 4461.
(11) Evans, D. A. In Asymmetric Synthesis; Morrison, J. D., Ed.;
Academic Press: New York, 1985; Vol. 4, pp 2-110 and references therein.
(12) The dibenzyl alcohol 18 was obtained in accordance with the method
described in Scheme 2, with the exception of the step relative to the
reduction of the benzylidene derivative. In this case, we had to use
NaBH3(CN)-(CH3)3SiCl, in CH3CN, to obtain the secondary benzyl ether
since the use of DIBAL provided the benzyl ether in the primary position.
Johansson, R.; Samuelsson, B. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1992, 2371.
(3) Nicholas, K. M.; Siegel, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 4999.
(4) D´ıaz, D. D.; Mart´ın, V. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, in press.
(5) For other examples of “ionic hydrogenations” of alcohols, see: (a)
Kursanov, D. N.; Parnes, Z. N.; Loim, N. M. Synthesis 1974, 633 and
references therein. (b) Adlington, M. G.; Orfanopoulos, M.; Fry, J. L.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 2955. (c) Carey, F. A.; Tremper, H. S. J. Org.
Chem. 1971, 36, 758. (d) Olah, G. A.; Arvanaghi, M.; Ohannecian, L.
Synthesis 1987, 770. (e) Smonou, I.; Orfanopoulos, M. Tetrahedron Lett.
1988, 29, 5793 and references therein.
336
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 3, 2000