S. D. Larsen et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13 (2003) 3491–3495
3495
4. Dhavan, R.; Tsai, L.-H. Nat. Rev Mol. Biol. 2001, 2, 749.
5. Patrick, G. N.; Zukerberg, L.; Nikolic, M.; de la Monte, S.;
Dikkes, P.; Tsai, L.-H. Nature 1999, 402, 615.
6. Lau, L.-F.; Seymour, P. A.; Sanner, M. A.; Schachter, J. B.
J. Mol. Neurosci. 2002, 19, 267.
7. (a) Wolfe, S.; Ducep, J.-B.; Greenhorn, J. D. Can. J. Chem.
1975, 53, 3435. (b) Holzapfel, C. W.; Pettit, G. R. J. Org.
Chem. 1985, 50, 2323.
8. (a) Beattie, D.; Crossley, R. H.; Hill, D. G.; Shepherd, R. G.
Eur. J. Med. Chem. Chimi. Thererocycl. 1979, 14, 105. (b) A
Curtius rearrangement to generate 5-isocyanato-1,3-thiazoles
has been reported: South, M. S. J. Het. Chem. 1991, 28, 1003.
9. For a review of catch-and-release protocols see: Thompson,
L. A. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2000, 4, 324.
Figure 2. End view of low-energy conformations of 19, 36, and 17,
respectively. Lone pairs are shown for illustrative purposes only.
10. For another report of trapping isocyanates with oxime
resin, see: Scialdone, M. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 8141.
11. Representative H NMR spectra (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) d:
Compound 2: 4.62 (s, 2H), 7.41 (t, J=6 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (d, J=6
Hz, 2H), 8.31 (s, 1H), 12.9 (s, 1H). Compound 3: 4.75 (s, 2H),
7.25 (t, J=6 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (d, J=6 Hz, 2H), 8.15 (s, 1H).
Compound 4: 2.74 (s, broad, 4H), 3.65 (s, broad, 4H), 4.52 (s,
2H), 7.12 (s, 1H), 7.40 (t, J=6 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (d, J=6 Hz, 2H),
7.93 (s, 1H), 8.86 (s, 1H).
the electrostatics about the terminal nitrogen for 19 and
36 quite different than 17, which could conceivably
adversely affect the electrostatic complementarity of the
enzyme binding site with 17 and other terminal NH
analogues.
1
In summary, a catch-and-release protocol was devel-
oped for the synthesis of 2-dimensional libraries of 2-
substituted-4-acylamino-1,3-thiazoles that entailed
trapping of intermediate thiazole isocyanates onto
oxime resin and subsequent release under basic catalysis
following washing. The protocol was successful at
avoiding contamination of the final analogues with
byproducts arising from the intermediate Curtius rear-
rangement. Assay of the resulting libraries for selective
inhibition of CDK5/p25 versus the closely homologous
enzyme CDK2/cyclin A revealed that only analogues
derived from 1,1-dialkylhydrazines and alkoxyamines
retained activity. Molecular modeling indicated that the
only apparent conformational difference between the
active analogues and the inactive ones devrived from
monoalkyl hydrazines was the syn-periplanar orientation
of the terminal NH to the urea carbonyl, which changes
the position of the nitrogen lone pair, altering the elec-
trostatic contribution about the terminal heteroatom.
12. Kinase assays. CDK2/cyclin A and CDK5/p25 kinase
assays were performed using the scintillation proximity assay
(SPA) format with the following conditions. The assays contained
50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 20 mM Na3VO4, 15 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
DTT, 0.1 mg/mL BSA, 0.2 mg/mL BGG, 0.01% Triton X-100,
1 mM biotinylated peptide (PKTPKKAKKL), and 0.2 mCi
[g33P]-ATP. CDK5/GST-p25 was used at 0.5 nM and CDK2/
GST-cyclin A was used at 4 nM. Reactions were incubated for
30 min at 37 ꢀC and then terminated with the addition of 500
mg streptavidin SPA beads (Amersham) in 50 mM ATP, 5 mM
EDTA, and 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 in PBS without calcium
and magnesium. CPM for each well were determined using a
Packard TopCount scintillation counter. Percent inhibition
compared to 100% control was calculated using the formula
100Â(1-(unknownÀbkgd)/(controlÀbkgd)). IC50 values were
calculated using the sigmoidal dose-response equation in
Prism (Graphpad). When tested more than once, the % inhib-
ition or IC50 values were averaged.
13. Several starting geometries were chosen for each com-
pound and then subsequently each geometry was optimized
using ab initio quantum mechanics (HF/6-31G*) in the
GAMESS14 suite of programs. Each compound led to two or
three low energy conformations, and Hessians were obtained
for the two lowest energy conformations for each compound
to confirm the nature of the stationary points–that is minima
on the potential energy surface. Results were visualized with
MacMolPlt15 and conformations were overlaid using
Mosaic2.16
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of
Michael Dupuis and Gary Petzold in enzyme preparation.
References and Notes
14. Schmidt, M. W.; Baldridge, K. K.; Boatz, J. A.; Elbert,
S. T.; Gordon, M. S.; Jensen, J. H.; Koseki, S.; Matsunaga,
N.; Nguyen, N.; Su, S. J.; Windus, T. L.; Dupuis, M.; Mon-
tgomery, J. A. J. Comput. Chem. 1993, 14, 1347.
1. Mandelkow, E.-M.; Mandelkow, E. Trends Cell Biol. 1998,
8, 425.
2. Spillantini, M. G.; Goedert, M. Trends Neurosci. 1998, 21,
428.
15. Bode, B. M.; Gordon, M. S. J. Mol. Graphics Mod. 1998,
16, 133.
3. Nikolic, M.; Dudek, H.; Kwon, Y. T.; Ramos, Y. F. M.;
Tsai, L.-H. Genes Dev. 1996, 10, 816.
16. Mosaic2 is a Pharmacia-developed modeling suite of pro-
grams.