(mp 125–127 °C; [a]D +101.6) in 81% yield; the reaction time
had to be extended because of the deactivating effects20 of the
donor 3,4-di-O-acetate protecting groups. Note the high
regiospecificity of this glycosylation, the a-coupled anomer
being the sole isolated product in high yield. Cleavage of the
isopropylidene acetal was accomplished by heating 13 at reflux
in aqueous AcOH containing ethylene glycol14 to give 14 (mp
126–128 °C; [a]D +116.5) which was acetylated to give 4.†
To exemplify our route the condensation of 4 with purine is
described, using the method of Vorbru¨ggen et al.21 with
Notes and references
† Selected data for 4: mp 105–107 °C (EtOAc–hexane); Rf 0.29 (EtOAc–
hexane 3+7); [a]2D0 +98.2 (c 0.2, CHCl3) (Found: C, 64.00; H, 6.15. Calc. for
C40H46O14: C, 63.98; H, 6.18%); dH(400 MHz; CDCl3) 1.86, 1.87, 1.93,
1.96 (12H, 4s, CH3CO), 3.29, 3.36 (2H, ABX, 2JAB 10.7, 3JAX 3.9, 3JBX 2.4,
H-6AA, H-6AB), 3.56 (1H, J 9.8, 3.4, H-2A), 3.63, 3.72 (2H, ABX, 2JAB 11.2,
3JAX 3.9, 3JBX 2.9, H-5A, H-5B), 3.88 (1H, ddd, J 10.3, 2.9, H-5A), 4.29 (1H,
AB, JAB 12.2, OCHHAr), 4.37–4.40 (1H, m, H-4), 4.47–4.57 (4H, m, 2 3
OCH2Ar), 4.63–4.64 (2H, m, H-3, OCHHAr), 5.03–5.08 (2H, m, H-1A, H-
4A), 5.33 (1H, d, J 4.9, H-2), 5.38 (1H, dd, J 9.3, H-3A), 6.12 (1H, s, H-1),
7.23–7.34 (15H, m, ArCH); dC (100.4 MHz; CDCl3) 20.45, 20.56, 20.63,
20.74, 20.83, 20.94, 21.05, 21.16 (8q, 4 3 CH3COa and b), 67.52 (t, C-6A),
68.85 (d, C-5A), 69.00, 69.28 (2t, C-5a and b), 71.89, 72.02 (2d, C-3Aa and b),
73.02 (d, C-2), 73.17, 73.26, 73.35, 73.41, 73.48, 73.55 (4t and 2d, C-
3a and b, OCH2Ara and b), 76.59, 76.76 (2d, C-2Aa and b), 81.27 (d, C-4),
96.28, 96.47 (2d, C-1Aa and b), 98.46, 98.50 (d, C-1a and b), 127.32, 127.61,
127.74, 127.91, 128.02, 128.36, 128.46 (7d, ArCH), 137.51, 137.76, 138.11
(3s, 3 3 C-1 of Bn rings), 169.35, 169.69, 170.17, 170.28 (4s, 4 3 CH3CO);
a and b subscripts denote signals arising from a and b-anomers
respectively; m/z (FAB+) 750 (M+, 1%), 91 (100). For uridophostin: dH
(D2O) 3.90–3.50 (7H, m, H-4A, H-5A, H-2B, H-5B, and H-6B), 4.17 (1H, m,
H-4B), 4.32–4.28 (2H, m, H-3A and H-3B), 4.74 (1H, m, H-2A), 5.15 (1H, br
s, H-1B), 5.74 (1H, d, J 8.3, H-5), 5.95 (1H, d, J 4.4, H-1A), 7.65 (1H, d, J
8.3, H-6); dP(100 MHz, D2O, 1H-decoupled) 0.23, 1.09, 1.78; HRMS
(triethylammonium salt, FAB) calc. for C15H24N2O20P3 645.0135, found
645.0130 (100%, M2); lmax(H2O)/nm 260.
TMSOTf as catalyst. The major product was the 9-b- -
D
ribofuranosidopurine nucleoside (nebularine) derivative 15
([a]D +73.6) which exhibited a deshielded doublet at dH 6.44 (J
4.9 Hz) corresponding to H-1A of a b-substituted product; purine
signals in the 13C NMR spectrum also corresponded closely to
those of the known22 2A,3A,5A-tri-O-acetyl nebularine. Stirring 15
in a mixture of concentrated aqueous ammonia and methanol
gave triol 16 ([a]D +23.5) required for phosphorylation. Triol
16 was phosphitylated and the resulting trisphosphite was
oxidised to trisphosphate 17 ([a]D +17.9).15 Deprotection of 17
to the purine analogue of 2 (‘purinophostin’, 18) was achieved
with catalytic transfer hydrogenation. The free acid was eluted
from MP1 AG ion exchange resin with a gradient of aqueous
TFA and converted into the sodium salt.
Other adenine-related base surrogates used were benzimida-
zole and imidazole, condensation being achieved similarly to
above to give 19 and 20. The imidazole analogue of adenophos-
tin A (‘imidophostin’) 20, in which the adenine six-membered
1 M. J. Berridge, Nature (London), 1993, 361, 315.
2 B. V. L. Potter and D. Lampe, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34,
1933.
3 S. Takahashi, T. Kinoshita and M. Takahashi, J. Antibiot., 1994, 47,
95.
4 M. Takahashi, K. Tanzawa and S. Takahashi, J. Biol. Chem., 1994, 269,
369; J. Hirota, T. Michikawa, A. Miyawaki, M. Takahashi, K. Tanzawa,
I. Okura, T. Furuichi and K. Mikoshiba, FEBS Lett., 1995, 368, 248.
5 J. S. Marchant, M. D. Beecroft, A. M. Riley, D. J. Jenkins, R. D.
Marwood, C. W. Taylor and B. V. L. Potter, Biochemistry, 1997, 36,
12780 and references therein.
6 D. J. Jenkins and B. V. L. Potter, Carbohydr. Res., 1996, 287, 169.
7 R. A. Wilcox, C. Erneux, W. U. Primrose, R. Gigg and S. R. Nahorski,
Mol. Pharmacol., 1995, 47, 1204.
8 N. Moitessier, F. Chre´tien, Y. Chapleur and C. Humeau, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1995, 46, 8023.
9 C. T. Murphy, A. M. Riley, C. J. Lindley, D. J. Jenkins, J. Westwick and
B. V. L. Potter, Mol. Pharmacol., 1997, 52, 741.
10 D. J. Jenkins, R. D. Marwood and B. V. L. Potter, Chem. Commun.,
1997, 449; Corrigendum, 805.
11 (a) S. Shuto, K. Tatani, Y. Ueno and A. Matsuda, J. Org. Chem., 1998,
63, 8815; (b) R. D. Marwood, A. M. Riley, V. Correa, C. W. Taylor and
B. V. L. Potter, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1999, 9, 453.
12 Y. Huang, M. Takahashi, K. Tanzawa and J. W. Putney Jr., J. Biol.
Chem., 1998, 273, 31815; G. S. Bird, M. Takahashi, K. Tanzawa and J.
W. Putney Jr., J. Biol. Chem., 1999, 274, 20643; L. M. Broad, D. L.
Armstrong and J. W. Putney Jr., J. Biol. Chem., 1999, 274, 32881 and
references therein.
13 H. Hotoda, M. Takahashi, K. Tanzawa, S. Takahashi and M. Kaneko,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36, 5037.
14 N. C. R. van Straten, G. A. van der Marel and J. H. van Boom,
Tetrahedron, 1997, 53, 6509.
15 R. D. Marwood, V. Correa, C. W. Taylor and B. V. L. Potter,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2000, in press.
16 J. Moravcova, J. Capkova and J. Stanek, Carbohydr. Res., 1994, 263,
61.
17 T. Q. Chen and M. M. Greenberg, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 1103;
P. B. Alper, M. Hendrix, P. Sears and C.-H. Wong, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1998, 120, 1965.
18 T. Desai, J. Gigg and R. Gigg, Carbohydr. Res., 1996, 280, 209.
19 W. Liao and D. Lu, Carbohydr. Res., 1996, 296, 171.
20 N. L. Douglas, S. V. Ley, U. Lu¨cking and S. L. Warriner, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1, 1998, 51.
21 H. Vorbru¨ggen, K. Krolikiewicz and B. Bennua, Chem. Ber., 1981, 114,
1234.
22 V. Nair and S. G. Richardson, J. Org. Chem., 1980, 45, 3969.
23 A. Al Mourabit, M. Beckmann, A. Poupat, A. Ahond and P. Potier,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1996, 7, 3455.
ring had been effectively deleted, was readily accessible by
condensation of 4 with N-trimethylsilylimidazole.23 A small
amount of bis-glycosylated material was also formed. The
desired product was deprotected, phosphorylated and depro-
tected as previously. We also synthesised an analogue (‘ur-
idophostin’, 21†) possessing the natural nucleic acid base,
uracil. Condensation of 4 with 4-methylanisole gave both a-
1
and b-substituted aryl C-glycosides in a ca. 1+1 ratio from H
NMR spectroscopy; these products were used to prepare the a-
and b-4-methyl anisole analogues of adenophostin A, 22a and
22b respectively, by the coupling of 4-methylanisole and 4 in
the presence of AgCO2CF3 and SnCl4. This demonstrates the
utility of our route also for the preparation of C-nucleoside
analogues.
Convergent construction of 2 was described by van Straten
et al.14 This elegant approach was somewhat hampered,
however, by a large number of protection/deprotection steps.
Our present route allows efficient access to a central disaccha-
ride 4, whilst the choice of protecting groups requires minimal
manipulation between Vorbru¨ggen condensation and target
trisphosphates.
In summary, we report here an efficient route to the first
synthetic base-modified analogues of adenophostin A.
We thank the Wellcome Trust for a Prize Studentship
(R. D. M.) and Programme Grant Support (045491 to
B. V. L. P.), the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and
Culture of Japan for support to S. S. and acknowledge
discussions with Dr A. M. Riley and C. Mort for technical
assistance.
Communication a909347h
220
Chem. Commun., 2000, 219–220