formylation of oct-1-ene the arsine based ligands 2 and 3 proved
to give more efficient catalysts than the parent xantphos ligand
1. The xantarsine ligand 2 is only slightly less selective than
xantphos 1, but more than 10 times as active. The xantphos-
arsine ligand 3 is even 20 times as active as xantphos 1, while
displaying the same excellent selectivity for linear aldehyde
formation. This is remarkable, since up to now, without
exception, arsine ligands have performed worse than phosphine
ligands in platinum/tin-catalysed hydroformylation.2c,3a,8 To
our knowledge the high activity and selectivity displayed by the
mixed xantphosarsine ligand 3 under these mild conditions is
unprecedented.
Comparison of the activities of the xantphos ligands 1 and 4
reveals a dramatic effect of the natural bite angle. Narrowing of
the natural bite angle from 110 to 102°, results in a 40 fold
higher hydroformylation rate. This is accompanied, however,
by a considerable increase in isomerization activity. As a result,
the selectivity for linear aldehyde obtained for xantphos 4 is
lower than that for xantphos 1. It is striking that the selectivities
of the xantphos ligands 1 and 4 observed in the platinum/tin-
catalysed hydroformylation are virtually identical to those
obtained before for rhodium.5c,6a
The high selectivities of ligands 1, 2 and 3 compared to
xantphos 4 can be ascribed to the wider natural bite angles of the
former ligands.‡ Widening of the bite angle of the ligand will
increase the steric congestion around the platinum centre
resulting in more selective formation of the sterically less
hindered linear aldehydes. An explanation for the higher
activities of ligands 2, 3 and 4 compared to xantphos 1 is still
lacking, but we speculate that it is caused by the coordination
behaviour of the ligands in the platinum/tin complexes.
Increasing the natural bite angle of bidentate ligands favours the
formation of trans complexes. Compared to xantphos 1,
xantphos 4 and the arsine ligands 2 and 3 probably give more or
easier formation of the cis-platinum complexes, a prerequisite
for efficient hydroformylation.10
In conclusion, wide bite angle arsine based ligands can give
very efficient catalysts for selective hydroformylation of
terminal alkenes. The catalytic performances of the arsine
modified platinum/tin systems can compete with the best results
obtained using rhodium catalysts.1,5c,11 Especially in applica-
tions where very high l:b ratios are a necessity these systems
could be interesting alternatives for rhodium–diphosphine
catalysts.
Financial support from the Technology Foundation (STW) of
the Netherlands Organization for Scientific research (NWO) is
gratefully acknowledged.
Notes and references
‡ When comparing the activities and selectivities of ligands 1, 2, and 3, it
should be noted that in general the s-donor ability and the steric effects of
substituents on the donor atom decrease in the order of P > As.9
1 M. Beller, B. Cornils, C. D. Frohning and C. W. Kohlpaintner, J. Mol.
Catal. A: Chem., 1995, 104, 17; C. D. Frohning and C. W. Kohlpaintner,
in Applied Homogeneous Catalysis with Organometallic Compounds: a
comprehensive handbook in two volumes, ed. B. Cornils and W. A.
Herrmann, VCH, Weinheim, 1996, vol. 1, pp. 27–104.
2 (a) Y. Kawabata, T. Hayashi and I. Ogata, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1979, 462; (b) T. Hayashi, Y. Kawabata, T. Isoyama and I.
Ogata, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1981, 54, 3438; (c) I. Schwager and J. F.
Knifton, J. Catal., 1976, 45, 256; (d) F. Ancillotti, M. Lami and M.
Marchionna, J. Mol. Catal., 1990, 63, 15.
3 (a) S. C. Tang and L. Kim, J. Mol. Catal., 1982, 14, 231; (b) P. W. N. M.
van Leeuwen, C. F. Roobeek, R. L. Wife and J. H. G. Frijns, J. Chem.
Soc., 1986, 31; (c) C. Botteghi, S. Paganelli, U. Matteoli, A. Scrivanti,
R. Ciociaro and L. M. Venanzi, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1990, 73, 284.
4 F. Agbossou, J.-F. Carpentier and A. Mortreux, Chem. Rev., 1995, 95,
2485.
5 (a) C. P. Casey, G. T. Whiteker, M. G. Melville, L. M. Petrovich, J. A.
Gavney Jr. and D. R. Powell, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 5535; (b)
M. Kranenburg, Y. E. M. van der Burgt, P. C. J. Kamer and P. W. N. M.
van Leeuwen, Organometallics, 1995, 14, 3081; (c) L. A. van der Veen,
P. H. Keeven, G. C. Schoemaker, J. N. Reek, P. C. J. Kamer, P. W. N.
M. van Leeuwen, M. Lutz and A. L. Spek, Organometallics, 2000, 19,
in press.
6 (a) L. A. van der Veen, P. C. J. Kamer and P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 336; (b) P. Meessen, D. Vogt and W.
Keim, J. Organomet. Chem., 1998, 551, 165.
7 C. P. Casey and G. T. Whiteker, Isr. J. Chem., 1990, 30, 299.
8 H. C. Clark and J. A. Davies, J. Organomet. Chem., 1981, 213, 503.
9 Advanced Inorganic Chemistry: a comprehensive text, ed. F. A. Cotton
and G. Wilkinson, 5th edn., Wiley, New York, 1988, p. 432.
10 M. Gomez, G. Muller, D. Sainz, J. Sales and X. Solans, Organome-
tallics, 1991, 10, 4036; I. Toth, T. Kegi, C. J. Elsevier and L. Kollar,
Inorg. Chem., 1994, 33, 5708.
11 E. Billig, A. G. Abatjoglou, D. R. Bryant, E. Billig, A. G. Abatjoglou,
(to Union Carbide), EP 213639, 1987 (Chem. Abstr., 1987 107,
7392r).
Communication a906903h
334
Chem. Commun., 2000, 333–334