Y. Nishihara et al.
below). The reaction of aliphatic terminal alkynes such as 1-
octyne and propargylbenzene gave a mixture of the isomers
(Z)-3 and (E)-4 with poor selectivity, whereas the sterically
hindered terminal alkynes such as 3,3-dimethyl-1-butyne
and trimethylsilylacetylene underwent the selective reaction
to yield the corresponding adducts (Z)-3g and (Z)-3h, re-
spectively (Table 2, entries 7 and 8). This selectivity can be
rationalized by considering that the electron-rich aliphatic
alkynes would accelerate non-catalyzed anti-addition, but
that the steric bulkiness of the substituents would avoid the
nucleophilic attack of the chloride counterion after the for-
mation of the thiirenium species in the uncatalyzed pathway.
On the other hand, internal alkynes such as 4-octyne and di-
phenylacetylene did not give the desired products (Z)-3
under optimized reaction conditions and instead gave anti-
products (E)-4 in 78% and 3%, respectively. These results
imply that two substituents of internal alkyne would sup-
press a coordination of palladium to the alkynes and conse-
quently lead to an acceleration of the non-catalyzed anti-ad-
dition.
Next, a variety of sulfenyl chlorides 2 were examined for
the chlorothiolation of 1a. Electron-rich aromatic sulfenyl
chlorides 2b and 2c reacted smoothly (Table 2, entries 9 and
10). The reaction of the brominated substrate 2d occurred
to provide the corresponding adduct (Z)-3k, and left the
bromo substituent intact (Table 2, entry 11). Electron-defi-
cient 2e also participated in the reaction, albeit in low yield
(Table 2, entry 12). A substituent at the ortho-position did
not retard the reaction to afford (Z)-3m in 66% yield
(entry 13).
tered radical forms divalent palladium species, in which co-
ordination of sulfur to palladium controls the regioselectivi-
ty to form the (Z)-alkenylpalladium species. Finally, reduc-
tive elimination affords the adducts and regenerates Pd0. We
then investigated the reaction of 1a with 2a in the presence
of a radical scavenger (Scheme 3). Consequently, we deter-
Scheme 3. Reactions in the presence of radical scavengers.
mined that even in the presence of TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetra-
methylpiperidine 1-oxyl) or garvinoxyl the chlorothiolation
proceeded smoothly to form (Z)-3a in 60% and 68% yields,
respectively. We also did not observe any adduct of radical
scavengers in both reactions. These results strongly rule out
a radical process.
The utility of the chlorothiolation adducts (Z)-3 is illus-
trated in Scheme 4. The adduct (Z)-3a was treated with
mCPBA to afford the corresponding sulfone 6, which was
then treated with a thiol to give the vic-difunctionalized
alkene 7[21] bearing two different arylthio groups. Dithioal-
kene 7 is a potent ligand for transition-metal-catalyzed allyl-
ic substitution reactions,[22] which cannot be prepared from
anti-adduct (E)-4.
Although the reaction mechanism of the present chloro-
thiolation is not clear at this stage, one of the possible reac-
tion mechanisms is a Pd0/PdII pathway initiated by oxidative
addition of the sulfenyl chlorides 2 to Pd0, which has prece-
dent in the transition-metal-catalyzed addition of thiocya-
nates[11] and disulfides[12] to alkynes. Therein, oxidative addi-
tion of 2 to Pd0 would afford a chloropalladium(II) arene-
thiolate complex.[13] The subsequent chloropalladation of
terminal alkynes 1 in a syn-fashion affords 2-chloro-1-alke-
nylpalladium species.[14] Sequential reductive elimination de-
livers 3 and regenerates the initial Pd0 catalyst. We believe
that high regioselectivity can be attributed to a steric control
as the relatively bulky palladium moiety adds to the termi-
nal carbon of the alkynes. Reported examples of the inser-
tion of alkynes into a chlorine–palladium bond[15,16] are sug-
gestive of this mechanism, although the other pathways
through thiopalladation cannot be ruled out.[17,18] While it
was reported anti-adduct (E)-4 can isomerize into syn-
adduct (Z)-3 with a slight excess of sulfenyl chloride,[3d] no
isomerization was observed under our reaction conditions.[19]
Homolytic cleavage of the chlorine–sulfur bond in 2 could
occur,[4a–c,5,20] and so the reaction has the possibility to pro-
ceed via a radical pathway. Single-electron transfer (SET)
from Pd0 to sulfenyl chloride generates PdICl and a sulfenyl
radical. The subsequent radical addition at the less hindered
position of terminal alkyne gives the corresponding alkenyl
radical species. Recombination of PdICl with carbon-cen-
Scheme 4. Transformation of (Z)-3a.
Since the in situ synthesis of 2 from the corresponding
thiols and N-chlorosuccinimide (NCS) has been widely uti-
lized,[23] a more practical sequence with chlorination of thiol
and subsequent chlorothiolation of 1a was envisaged. Thus,
the in situ prepared 2a, derived from chlorination of benze-
nethiol with NCS, was treated with 1a and PdACTHNURGTNEUNG(tfa)2 to give
(Z)-3a in 83% overall yield (Scheme 5a). Encouraged by
the success of this one-pot synthesis of (Z)-3a, we thus in-
vestigated chlorothiolation with aliphatic sulfenyl chlorides.
Since methanesulfenyl chloride (2g) was found to be unsta-
ble and to decompose easily on the bench top, we per-
formed the one-pot reaction of phenylacetylene (1a), start-
ing from dimethyl disulfide. To our delight, chlorothiolation
proceeded to give the corresponding product (Z)-3n in 36%
3
&
&
Chem. Asian J. 2013, 00, 0 – 0
ꢀ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
These are not the final page numbers! ÞÞ