This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for
Scientific Research on Priority Areas (no. 11136222 ‘Metal-
assembled Complexes’ to K-i. S., no. 11166238 ‘Molecular
Physical Chemistry’ to K-i. S., and no. 10146103 ‘Creation of
Characteristic Delocalized Electronic Systems’ to Y. S.) from
the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan.
We appreciate the technical assistance provided by the
Materials Analysis Centre of ISIR, Osaka University as well as
helpful discussions with Professor S. Taniguchi, Ibaraki
National College of Technology, Japan.
Notes and references
† Data: 3: 1H-NMR (CDCl3) d 10.21 (s, 2H), 9.44 (s, 2H), 9.33 (d, J = 5,
2H), 9.06 (d, J = 5, 2H), 8.97 (s, 2H), 8.09 (d, J = 2, 4H), 7.81 (t, J = 2
Hz, 2H), 1.54 (s, 36H), 23.27 (bs, 2H). 4: 1H-NMR (CDCl3) d 9.88 (s, 2H),
9.23 (s, 2H), 9.17 (d, J = 5, 2H), 8.98 (d, J = 5, 2H), 8.90 (s, 2H), 7.92 (d,
J = 2, 4H), 7.76 (t, J = 2 Hz, 2H), 1.50 (s, 36H). 5: 1H-NMR (CDCl3) d
9.39 (s, 2H), 9.34 (d, J = 5, 2H), 8.69 (d, J = 5, 2H), 8.62 (s, 2H), 7.72 (d,
J = 2, 4H), 7.64 (t, J = 2 Hz, 2H), 1.39 (s, 36H). 6: 1H-NMR (CDCl3) d
9.50 (s, 2H), 9.41 (d, J = 5, 2H), 8.75 (d, J = 5, 2H), 8.64 (s, 2H), 7.79 (d,
J = 2, 4H), 7.70 (t, J = 2, 2H), 1.45 (s, 36H), 0.54 (s, 18H). UV–vis lmax
(CHCl3): 310 (log e = 3.77), 438 (4.89), 554 (3.76) nm. 7: 1H-NMR
(CDCl3) d 9.55 (s, 2H), 9.46 (d, J = 5, 2H), 8.79 (d, J = 5, 2H), 8.68 (s,
2H), 7.81 (d, J = 2, 4H), 7.72 (t, J = 2, 2H), 4.05 (s, 2H), 1.46 (s, 36H) ppm.
1: 1H-NMR (CDCl3) d 10.09 (s, 8H), 9.66 (d, J = 5, 8H), 8.88 (d, J = 5,
8H), 8.68 (s, 8H), 7.87 (d, J = 2, 16H), 7.75 (t, J = 2, 8H), 1.55 (s, 144H).
UV–vis lmax (CHCl3): 324 (log e = 3.94), 423 (sh, 4.37), 503 (4.85), 562
(4.12), 659 (4.44) nm.
Fig. 2 Absorption spectra of 1 (solid line) and 6 (dotted line) in CHCl3.
typical reaction, 41.3 mg of 7, 400.0 mg of Cu2Cl2, 0.55 mL of
TMEDA, and 50 mL of dry CH2Cl2 gave 8.9 mg of the tetramer
1 as a lustrous dark-green solid (22% yield). It should be
emphasised that this relatively high yielding formation of cyclic
1 occurred in the absence of template;12 the isolated yield of the
structurally similar square was 7% at most.11
1
The H-NMR chemical shift of the internal protons (Ha:
10.09 ppm) is informative about the structure of 1 from the
following two view points. First, compared to the corresponding
protons of 7 (HaA: 9.55 ppm), Ha is shifted to low field by +0.54
ppm. Although a similar downfield shift was observed for the
linear porphyrin oligomers connected by the diacetylene
linkages, e.g. +0.22 ppm for the dimer,8 the shift for 1 is more
than double this value. Second, the difference in the chemical
shifts of the internal (Ha) and the external protons (Hb: 9.66
ppm) adjacent to the diacetylene units of 1 is +0.43 ppm. This
value is also larger than that observed for 7 (+0.09 ppm: 9.55
ppm for HaA and 9.46 ppm for HbA). These results suggest that the
Ha-protons of 1 are affected by the ring current, not only of the
two adjacent porphyrin rings, but also of the diagonal porphyrin
in the square and also clearly suggests 1 to be cyclic.
1 Reviews: M. R. Wasielewski, Chem. Rev., 1992, 92, 435; H. Kurreck
and M. Huber, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34, 849.
2 J. D. Spence and T. D. Lash, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 1530.
3 K.-i. Sugiura, H. Tanaka, T. Matsumoto, T. Kawai and Y. Sakata, Chem.
Lett., 1999, 1193.
4 H. L. Anderson, S. J. Martin and D. D. C. Bradley, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl., 1994, 33, 655.
5 H. L. Anderson, Inorg. Chem., 1994, 33, 972.
6 P. N. Taylor, J. Huuskonen, G. Rumbles, R. T. Aplin, E. Williams and
H. L. Anderson, Chem. Commun., 1998, 909.
7 H. L. Anderson, Chem. Commun., 1999, 2323.
8 V. S.-Y. Lin, S. G. DiMagno and M. J. Therien, Science, 1994, 264,
1105; V. S.-Y. Lin and M. J. Therien, Chem. Eur. J., 1995, 1, 645.
9 T. Pullerits and V. Sundström, Acc. Chem. Res., 1996, 29, 381.
10 H. L. Anderson and J. K. M. Sanders, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.,
1989, 1714.
11 R. W. Wagner, J. Seth, S. I. Yang, D. Kim, D. F. Bocian, D. Holten and
J. S. Lindsey, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 5042.
12 S. Anderson, H. L. Anderson and J. K. M. Sanders, Acc. Chem. Res.,
1993, 26, 469.
13 J. Li, A. Ambroise, S. I. Yang, J. R. Diers, J. Seth, C. R. Wack, D. F.
Bocian, D. Holten and J. S. Lindsey, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121,
8927; O. Mongin, A. Schuwey, M.-A. Vallot and A. Gossauer,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 8347.
14 C. M. Drain and J.-M. Lehn, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1994,
2313 (corrigendum: J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995, 503); K.
Funatsu, A. Kimura, T. Imamura and Y. Sasaki, Chem. Lett., 1995,
765.
15 To the best of our knowledge, the introduction of the acetylene group on
the meso-position was first proposed by Arnold and coworkers in 1978.
D. P. Arnold, A. W. Johnson and M. Mahendran, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1, 1978, 366; D. P. Arnold and L. J. Nitschinsk, Tetrahedron,
1992, 48, 8781; D. P. Arnold and D. A. James, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62,
3460; D. P. Arnold, G. A. Heath and D. A. James, J. Porphyrins
Phthalocyanines, 1999, 3, 5.
The electronic spectra of 1 and 6 are shown in Fig. 2. The
spectrum of 1 is composed of two main bands: Q-band-like
band I and Soret-band-like band II.† Reflecting the highly
conjugated structure, band I and band II appear at 15 180 (659)
and 19 880 cm21 (503 nm), respectively. Both band I and band
II are shifted to lower energy compared with those of the
monomer 6 by about 2900 cm21. Although these bands appear
at much longer wavelengths than those of the porphyrin square
connected by meso-aryl-based linkages reported by Lindsey and
coworkers (lmax = 23 260 cm21; 430 nm),11 these wavelengths
are similar to the corresponding linear tetramer.6 The intensity
of band I normalized per chromophore was increased compared
with that of 6. Conversely, the intensity of band II was
decreased. This phenomenon suggests that the degeneracy of
the a1u and a2u orbitals of the porphyrins is lifted7 and that a new
p-electronic system in the square is formed.
In conclusion, a novel and highly conjugated porphyrin
square was prepared. In addition to the expanded p-system of
the molecule, our square has a central cavity corresponding to
the size of molecules such as hexamethylbenzene.18 These
characteristics will allow us to use the square as an advanced
host molecule. We are currently investigating the photo-
chemistry of the corresponding free base and zinc complex, as
well as contraction and expansion of the square by replacing the
diacetylene units with –C·C– and –(C·C–)n (n > 3) linkers,
respectively, keeping the p-conjugation between the four
porphyrins.
16 S. Taniguchi, H. Hasegawa, M. Nishimura and M. Takahashi, Synlett,
1999, 73.
17 F. Li, K. Yang, J. S. Tyhonas, K. A. MacCrum and J. S. Lindsey,
Tetrahedron, 1997, 53, 12 339.
18 J. D. Ferrara, C. Tessier-Youngs and W. J. Youngs, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1985, 107, 6719.
1106
Chem. Commun., 2000, 1105–1106