6944
The basis of the observed ca. 20:1 enantioselectivity of deprotonation of 5 by 6 and LiBr to
form the (S)-enolate 14 is a matter of conjecture at this time. One reasonable transition state
model involves an eight-membered transition state with the ring members: a-H (axial), C(a),
CO, Li±Br and LiNR2 with the lone pair on nitrogen attacking a-H (axial).
In summary, the chiral amine 2, which is readily available in one step from inexpensive
commercial precursors, and the N-lithio derivative 6 are promising synthetic reagents. The utility
of 6 in enantioselective enolate formation has been demonstrated by the conversion of 4-t-butyl-
cyclohexanone (5) via the chiral enolate 14 to several interesting transformation products.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation and the National
Institutes of Health.
References
1. Busch-Petersen, J.; Corey, E. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 2515. In this paper we inadvertently omitted
referencing two earlier publications which were relevant: Brander, M. M. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas. 1918, 37,
67 mentions, but provides no further information on trityl-t-butylamine. Maender, O. W.; Janzen, E. G. J. Org. Chem.
1969, 34, 4072 also mention this compound and describe it as a colorless liquid (solid, mp 90±91ꢀC in our hands).
2. Shirai, R.; Tanaka, M.; Koga, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 543.
3. Cain, C. M.; Cousins, R. P. C.; Coumbarides, G.; Simkins, N. S. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 523.
4. For a recent review on enantioselective deprotonation by chiral bases, see: O'Brien, P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1998, 1439.
5. Corey, E. J.; Gross, A. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 495.
6. Enantiomeric excess of 7 was determined by transformation to 8 and analysis of 8 by HPLC using a Chiral
Technologies Inc. Chiralpak AD column with 5% isopropyl alcohol in hexane for elution; retention times: minor
enantiomer 6.3 min, major enantiomer 8, 7.3 min; ¯ow rate, 1 mL/min at 23ꢀC.
7. Extractive work-up of the residue remaining from the distillation of silyl enol ether 7 allowed ecient recovery of
the chiral amine 2.
8. (a) Crabtree, S. R.; Mander, L. N.; Sethi, S. Org. Synth. 1991, 70, 256. (b) Mander, L. N.; Sethi, P. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1983, 24, 5425.
9. The enol methoxycarboxyl ester of 5 was produced as a byproduct of the conversion 5!9 in ca. 7% yield under
these conditions; in the absence of TMEDA more of this byproduct was formed.
10. The relative stereochemistry of 11 follows from previously known diastereoselective Robinson annulations. See,
for example: Turner, R. B.; Lee Jr., R. E.; Hildenbrand, E. G. J. Org. Chem. 1961, 26, 4800.
11. (a) Singh, A. K.; Bakshi, R. K.; Corey, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 6187. (b) See also: Beeson, C.; Pham,
N.; Dix, T. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 2925.
12. (a) Dale, J. A.; Dull, D. L.; Mosher, H. S. J. Org. Chem. 1969, 34, 2543. (b) Dale, J. A.; Mosher, H. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 112.
13. Retention times: minor enantiomer, 7.1 min; major enantiomer, 8.3 min.
14. The assignment of absolute con®guration of 15 follows from data reported above for the enolate 14. The
1
equatorial arrangement of the a-hydroxybenzyl substituent is indicated by the 500 MHz H NMR spectrum of
15 which shows an 8.9 Hz coupling constant between the a-methine proton and one of the b-methylene protons.
Finally, the con®guration at the a-hydroxybenzyl stereocenter follows from the pericyclic chair ring transition
state preference for the lithium enolate aldol reaction with aldehydes; see: House, H. O.; Crumrine, D. S.;
Teranishi, A. Y.; Olmstead, H. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 3310.
15. Schlosser, M.; Jenny, T.; Guggisberg, Y. Synlett 1990, 704.
16. Compounds 7±9, 11±13, and 15±17 described above were characterized by infrared, 1H NMR, 13C NMR and high
resolution mass spectra using chromatographically puri®ed or recrystallized samples.