T. Otsubo et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23 (2013) 2245–2249
2249
5. (a) Jurkevica, A.; Halsall, H. B.; Seliskar, C. J.; Heineman, W. R. Anal. Bioanal.
Chem. 2010, 397, 3133; (b) Miranda, O. R.; Chen, H.; You, C.; Mortenson, D. E.;
Yang, X.; Bunz, U. H. F.; Rotello, V. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5285.
6. (a) Saito, M.; Hagita, H.; Iwabuchi, Y.; Fujii, I.; Ikeda, K.; Ito, M. Histochem. Cell
Biol. 2002, 117, 453; (b) Minami, A.; Shimizu, H.; Meguro, Y.; Shibata, N.;
Kanazawa, H.; Ikeda, K.; Suzuki, T. Neuroimage 2011, 58, 34.
7. Tinnefeld, P.; Sauer, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2642.
8. (a) Ahao, Y.; Zhaug, X.; Han, Z.; Qiao, L.; Li, C.; Jian, L.; Shen, G.; Yu, R. Anal.
Chem. 2009, 81, 7022; (b) Powe, A. M.; Das, S.; Lowry, M.; El-Zahab, B.;
Fukayode, S. O.; Geng, M. L.; Baker, G. A.; Wang, L.; McCarroll, M. E.; Patonay,
G.; Li, M.; Aljarrah, M.; Neal, S.; Warner, I. M. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 4865.
9. (a) DeSilva, A. P.; Gunaratne, H. Q. N.; Gunnlaugsson, T.; Huxley, A. J. M.;
McCoy, C. P.; Rademacher, J. T.; Rice, T. E. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1515; (b)
Dedecker, P.; Hotta, J.; Flors, C.; Sliwa, M.; Uji-i, H.; Roeffaers, M. B. J.; Ando, R.;
Mizuno, H.; Miyawaki, A.; Hofkens, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 16132; (c)
Lord, S. J.; Conley, N. R.; Lee, H. D.; Samuel, R.; Liu, N.; Twieg, R. J.; Moerner, W.
E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9204; (d) Hotta, J.; Fron, E.; Dedecker, P.; Janssen,
K. P. F.; Li, C.; Müllen, K.; Harke, B.; Bückers, J.; Hell, S. W.; Hofkens, J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5021.
10. Rotman, B.; Zderic, J. A.; Edelstein, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1963, 50, 1.
11. (a) Nolan, G. P.; Fiering, S.; Nicolas, J.-F.; Herzenberg, L. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1998, 85, 2603; (b) Fiering, S.; Roederer, M.; Nolan, G. P.; Micklem, D. R.;
Parks, D. R.; Herzenberg, L. A. Cytometry 1991, 12, 291.
12. Rakhrmanova, V. A.; MacDonald, R. C. Anal. Biochem. 1998, 257, 234.
13. (a) Urano, Y.; Kamiya, M.; Kanda, K.; Ueno, T.; Hirose, K.; Nagano, T. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4888; (b) Kamiya, M.; Kobayashi, H.; Hama, Y.; Koyama,
Y.; Bernardo, M.; Nagano, T.; Choyke, P. L.; Urano, Y. J. Am. Soc. Chem. 2007, 129,
3918.
Linear regression analysis was also carried out for each sub-
strate with 100 L of reaction buffer (100 mM citric acid—phos-
phoric acid, pH 4.5) containing 10 mol/L fluorescent pigment
l
l
substrate 2 on a 96-well microplate reader. Although the fluores-
cence intensity was observed from a precipitated pigment upon
hydrolysis, the difference of fluorescent intensity indicated a linear
relationship against the amount of enzyme (Fig. 4B). The fluores-
cent color change with a large Stokes shift would be effective to
avoid an influence of remaining substrate or increase measure-
ment accuracy. This linearity also gave a guarantee of the concise
quantitative analysis of enzyme activity. The trends were large en-
ough for application to the measurement of enzyme activity. The
trend for the regression line of 2a was about 3–5 times steeper
than those of the others. These results suggested that 2a would
be suitable for highly precise enzyme analysis and imaging. The
others would be superior in terms of fluorescent multicolor stain-
ing and high stainability. The increase of stainability brought about
by the introduction of a halogen atom on the aromatic ring, result-
ing in lower solubility to water than that of 2a.
We synthesized novel fluorescent pigment substrates for b-D-
galactosidase,20–22 and 2a exhibited no fluorescence in solution,
while the others exhibited only weak purple fluorescence. The
fluorescent pigment substrates 2 were smoothly hydrolyzed by
14. (a) Santra, M.; Roy, B.; Ahn, K. H. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3422; (b) Chen, W.; Xing,
Y.; Pang, Y. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1362; (c) Kim, T.; Kang, H. J.; Han, G.; Chung, S. J.;
Kim, Y. Chem. Commun. 2009, 5895; (d) Sun, W.; Li, W.; Li, J.; Zhang, J.; Du, L.; Li,
M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 2332.
b-D
-galactosidase from Aspergillus oryzae.23 With the formation of
a fluorescent pigment, various intense colors of fluorescence were
recovered. Their ratios of fluorescence intensity before and after
enzyme reaction were high enough to recognize enzyme activity
by the naked eye without a quenching enzyme reaction. In addi-
tion, it should be mentioned that the enzymatic hydrolysis was
confirmed at pH 4.5. The difference of fluorescent intensity showed
a linear relationship against the enzyme concentration range of our
experiments. Because of immobility or poor solubility to water,
fluorescent pigment staining with 1 is superior in terms of not only
the possibility of observing fluorescence at low pH, but also in that
it is possible to stain live cells on the outer surface or interior of a
cell membrane without fixing or permeabilizing.
The following further examinations are now in progress; the
investigation of selective response of 2a–2e to b-D-galactosidase
from Escherichia coli or other eukaryotic cells, the staining of live
cells, and the synthesis of fluorescent pigment substrates for other
enzymes.
15. (a) Cellier, M.; Fabrega, O. J.; Fazacherley, E.; James, A. L.; Orenga, S.; Perry, J. D.;
Salwatura, V. L.; Stanforth, S. P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 19, 2903; (b) dos
Santos, R. C.; Faleiro, N. V. S.; Campo, L. F.; Scroferneker, M. L.; Carbellini, V. A.;
Rodembusch, F. S.; Sterani, V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 3048; (c) Chuang, W.;
Hsieh, C.; Lai, C.; Lai, C.; Shih, C.; Cehn, K.; Hung, W.; Shu, Y.; Chou, P. J. Org.
Chem. 2011, 76, 8189.
16. Anthony, K.; Brown, R. G.; Hepworth, J. D.; Hodgson, K. W.; May, B. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 2 1984, 2, 2111.
17. Mashraqui, S. H.; Kumar, S.; Vashi, D. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2004, 48,
125.
18. Tanaka, Y.; Kagamiishi, A.; Kiuchi, A.; Horiuchi, T. J. Biochem. 1975, 77, 241.
19. (a) Yang, Y.; Hamaguchi, K. J. Biochem. 1980, 87, 1003; (b) Graber, M. L.; Dilillo,
D. C.; Friedman, B. L.; Pastoriza-Munoz, E. P. Anal. Biochem. 1986, 156, 202.
20. General procedure for synthesis of 2-benzothiazol-2-yl phenol derivatives (1).
Synthesis of 1e is typical.
A solution of 5-methoxysalicylaldehyde (1.52 g,
10 mmol) and 2-amino-4-chlorothiophenol in THF–EtOH (10 mL/10 mL) was
stirred at 80 °C for 24 h. After cooling to room temperature, the solvent was
removed under reduced pressure, and the resulting precipitation was
suspended in Et2O, filtered, washed with Et2O, and dried to give desired
product 1e (2.06 g, 71% yield) as orange needles.
21. General procedure for synthesis of 2-(benzothiazol-2-yl)-phenyl-2,3,4,6-tetra-O-
acetyl-b-D-galactopyranoside (6): Synthesis of 6a is typical. To a suspension of
NaH (60% in mineral oil, 60 mg, 1.5 mmol) in THF (7 mL) was added dropwise a
solution of 5 (412 mg, 1 mmol) and 1a (227 mg, 1 mmol) in THF (3 mL) under
an argon atmosphere, and the resulting reaction mixture was stirred at 75 °C
for 18 h. After cooling to room temperature, the reaction mixture was diluted
with AcOEt, and the organic layer was washed successively with water (3
times) and brine, dried over dry Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under
reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column
chromatography (n-hexane/AcOEt = 2:1 to 1:1 as an eluent) to give the
desired product 6a (220 mg, 40% yield) as a colorless amorphous solid after
freeze–drying from dioxane.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
01.043. These data include MOL files and InChiKeys of the most
important compounds described in this article.
22. General procedure for synthesis of (2-benzothiazol-2-yl)-phenyl-b-D-
References and notes
galactopyranoside derivatives (2). The procedure for synthesis of 2a is
typical. To a solution of 6a (50.8 mg, 91 mmol) in dry THF-MeOH (1 mL/
1 mL) was added a solution of sodium methoxide in MeOH (5 mol/L, 16 mL,
80 mmol), followed by stirring at room temperature for 1 hour (monitored by
TLC). The reaction was quenched by the addition of acetic acid (1 mol/L in THF,
118 mL, 118 mmol) followed by silca gel (5 mL), and concentrated under
reduced pressure. The residue was purified by dry silica gel column
chromatography (CHCl3/MeOH/H2O = 65:35:5 as an eluent) to give the
product 2a (28 mg, 79% yield) as a colorless amorphous solid after freeze–
drying from dioxane.
1. (a) Joseph, E.; Guesdon, J. L. Anal. Biochem. 1982, 119, 335; (b) Gopalan, V.;
Vander Jagt, D. J.; Libell, D. P.; Glew, R. H. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 9629; (c)
Kroeger, L.; Thiem, J. Carbohydr. Res. 2007, 342, 467.
2. (a) Lin, W. C.; Pretlow, T. P.; Pretlow, T. G., II.; Culp, L. A. Cancer Res. 1990, 50,
2808; (b) Gary, R. K.; Kindell, S. M. Anal. Biochem. 2005, 343, 329.
3. (a) Choi, J.; Choe, Y.; Lee, K.; Choi, Y.; Kim, S.; Kim, B. Carbohydr. Res. 2003, 338,
29; (b) Van Dort, M. E.; Lee, K. C.; Hamilton, C. A.; Rehemtulla, A.; Ross, B. D.
Mol. Imaging 2008, 7, 187; (c) Celen, S.; Cleynhens, J.; Deroose, C.; Groot, T.;
Ibrahimi, A.; Gijsbers, R.; Debyse, Z.; Mortelmans, L.; Verbruggen, A.; Bormans,
G. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 5117.
23. The preliminary enzyme reactions using b-D-galactosidase from Escherichia coli
or bovine liver were also carried out, but no hydrolysis was observed (data not
shown).
4. Yu, J.; Kodibagkar, V. D.; Hallac, R. R.; Liu, L.; Mason, R. P. Bioconjugate Chem.
2012, 23, 596.