R. Silvestri et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 8 (2000) 2305±2309
2309
crude residue was puri®ed on silica gel column (ethyl
acetate) to yield 5 (0.31 g, 92%); mp >237±238ꢀC (eth-
anol). H NMR (DMSO-d6): d 1.19 (t, J=7.0Hz, 3H,
Molecular modeling
1
Molecular modeling studies were performed using the
SYBYL13 software package running on a Silicon Graphics
R10000 workstation. Intramolecular and intermolecular
energies were calculated using the molecular mechanics
Tripos force ®eld14 including the electrostatic contribution.
Atom centered partial charges were calculated accord-
ing to the Gasteiger±Huckel method.15,16 Geometry
optimizations were realized with the SYBYL/MAX-
IMIN2 minimizer by applying the BFGS algorithm17
and setting a root-mean-square gradient of the forces
acting on each atom at 0.05 kcal/mol A as a con-
vergence criterion. Model building and docking of 3
into the RT binding site of non-nucleoside inhibitors
(extracted from the RT/R90385 complex solved at 2.4 A
resolution8) are detailed in a previous paper.9 Complexes
of compounds 5±7 with RT were constructed starting
from the docked conformation of 3 and submitted to
geometry-optimization.
COO CH2CH3), 4.15 (q, J=7.0 Hz, 2H, COOCH2CH3),
6.43 (3 line m, 1H, H4-pyrrole), 7.04 (dd, J=2.0 and
3.4 Hz, 1H, H3-pyrrole), 7.14 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 1H, H5-
benzene), 7.52 (u, 1H, H2-benzene), 7.64 (dd, J=1.9 and
8.3 Hz, 1H, H6-benzene), 7.82 (dd, J=2.0 and 3.1 Hz,
1H, H5-pyrrole), 11.11 and 11.31 ppm (two broad s, 2H,
NHCONH, disappeared on treatment with D2O). 13C
NMR (DMSO-d6): d 14.00 (COOCH2CH3), 60.52 (COO
CH2CH3), 107.91, 108.37, 110.73, 121.83, 122.68, 124.43,
129.04, 129.29 and 134.62 (aromatic C), 155.23 and 158.28
1
(COOEt and NHCONH). FT-IR: n 1713 and 1731cm
(CO). Anal. C14H13N3O5S (335.33), C, H, N, S.
Ethyl 1-[(1H-benzimidazol-5(6)-yl)sulfonyl]-1H-pyrrole-
2-carboxylate (6). A mixture of 10 (1.00 g, 0.0032 mol)
and formic acid (98±100%, 0.21 mL) was heated at
100 ꢀC for 2 h. After cooling the mixture was made alka-
line with 10% aqueous NaOH and shaken with ethyl ace-
tate. The organic layer was washed with brine and dried.
Removal of the solvent furnished the crude product which
was passed through a silica gel column (ethyl acetate) to
Acknowledgements
yield 6 (1.0g, 98%); mp 139±140 ꢀC (toluene). H NMR
The authors thank Italian Ministero della Sanita- Isti-
tuto Superiore di Sanita- X Progetto AIDS 1997 (grants
Nos 40A.0.06 and 40A.0.55), Italian MURST (40%
funds) and Regione Autonoma Sardegna (Progetto
Biotecnologie) for ®nancial support.
1
(DMSO-d6): d 1.17 (t, J=7.1Hz, 3H, COOCH2CH3),
4.14 (q, J=7.1 Hz, 2H, COOCH2CH3), 6.45 (m, 1H), 7.06
(m, 1H), 7.82 (m, 2H), 7.90 (m, 1H), 8.36 (broad, 1H),
8.55 (broad, 1H), 13.07 (broad s, 1H, NH, disappeared
1
on treatment with D2O). IR (Nujol): n 1720 cm (CO).
Anal. C14H13N3O4S (319.33), C, H, N, S.
References
Ethyl 1-[(1H-benzotriazol-5(6)-yl)sulfonyl]-1H-pyrrole-2-
carboxylate (7). An aqueous solution of sodium nitrite
(0.45 g, 0.0066 mol, 1.5 mL) was added in one portion to
a water cooled solution of 10 (1.86 g, 0.0060 mol) in
50% aqueous acetic acid (100 mL). The reaction was
stirred for 1 h, then mixture was poured on crushed ice
while stirring for some minutes. The solid which formed
was ®ltered, washed with water and dried. Crude pro-
duct was passed through a silica gel column (ethyl/ace-
tate) to aord 7 (1.5 g, 78%); mp 130±131ꢀC (toluene/
cyclohexane). 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 1.22 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H,
COOCH2CH3), 4.15 (q, J=7.1 Hz, 2H, COOCH2CH3),
6.38 (3 line m, 1H, H4-pyrrole), 7.10 (dd, J=1.8 and
3.7Hz, 1H, H3-pyrrole), 7.79 (dd, J=1.8 and 3.1Hz, 1H,
H5-pyrrole), 7.96 (m, 2H, benzene), 8.77 ppm (m, 1H,
benzene). IR (Nujol): n 1700 (CO), 3320 cm 1 (NH). Anal.
C13H12N4O4S (320.32), C, H, N, S.
1. De Clercq, E. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovirus 1992, 8, 119.
2. Young, S. D. Perspect. Drug Discovery Des 1993, 1, 181.
3. Mitsuya, H.; Weinhold, K. J.; Furman, P. A.; St. Clair, M.
H.; Nusino-Lehrman, S.; Gallo, R. C.; Bolognesi, D.; Barry,
D. W.; Broder, S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1985, 82, 7096.
4. Merluzzi, V. J.; Hargrave, K. D.; Labadia, M.; Grozinger,
K.; Skoog, M.; Wu, J. C.; Shih, C.-K.; Eckner, R. J.; Koup, R.
A.; Sullivan, J. L. Science 1990, 250, 1411.
5. De Clercq, E. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1995, 8, 200.
6. Kohlstaedt, L. A.; Wang, J.; Friedman, J. M.; Rice, P. A.;
Steitz, T. A. Science 1992, 256, 1783.
7. Artico, M.; Silvestri, R.; Massa, S.; Loi, A. G.; Corrias, S.;
Piras, G.; La Colla, P. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 522.
8. Ren, J.; Esnouf, R.; Garman, E.; Somers, D.; Ross, C.;
Kirby, I.; Keeling, J.; Darby, G.; Jones, Y.; Stuart, D.; Stam-
mers, D. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1995, 2, 293.
9. Artico, M.; Silvestri, R.; Pagnozzi, E.; Bruno, B.; Novel-
lino, E.; Greco, G.; Massa, S.; Ettorre, A.; Loi, A. G.; Scintu,
F.; La Colla, P. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 1886.
10. Bailey, D. M.; Johnson, R. E.; Albertson, N. F. Org.
Synth. 1971, 51, 100.
Biological evaluations
Activity of the compounds against HIV-1 multiplication
in acutely infected cells was based on the inhibition of
virus-induced cytopathicity in MT-4 and C8166 cells,
respectively. According to a previously reported pro-
cedure,7 the number of viable cells was determined by the
3-(4,5 - dimethylthiazol - 2 - yl) - 2,5 - diphenyltetrazolium
bromide (MTT) method. Cytotoxicity of the compounds
was evaluated in parallel with their antiviral activity. It
was based on the viability of mock-infected cells, as
monitored by the MTT method. Anti-RT assays were
performed as described in a previous paper.7
11. Dehn, J. W., Jr.; Gancher, E.; Resniek, P.; Kuhenfuss,
H.J. Patent Fr. 1,412,060 (1965). Chem. Abstr. 1996, 65,
7326d.
12. Cotarca, L.; Delogu, P.; Nardelli, A.; Sunjic, V. Synthesis,
1996, 553.
13. SYBYL Molecular Modeling System (version 6.2), Tripos
Assoc. St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
14. Clark, M.; Cramer, R. D., III; Van Opdenbosch, N. J.
Comput. Chem. 1989, 10, 982.
15. Gasteiger, J.; Marsili, M. Tetrahedron 1980, 36, 3219.
16. Purcel, V. P.; Singer, J. A. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1967, 12, 235.
17. Head, J.; Zerner, M. C. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1985, 122, 264.