L. Garuti et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 10 (2000) 2193±2195
2195
Table 1. The antiproliferative activities of benzimidazole-4,7-diones
and MMC
high antiproliferative activity of 1 and 2d on leukemia
and lymphoma cells, also at small doses, and the fact
that 1 is not toxic and 2d is toxic only at the higher
concentration (90 mM), we believe that these two com-
pounds could be interesting candidates for further in
vivo testing.
ID50 (mM)a
Compound
SupT1
Molt3
MCF7
1
2.87
38
15.31
6.26
5.03
1.32
18.32
30.6
11.99
32.14
20.82
60.4
22.45
7.52
2.63
39.67
2.66
62.65
>90
>90
40.3
62.8
36
>90
>90
>90
26.4
>90
42.92
1a
1b
1c
1e
1f
1g
2a
2c
2d
2e
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Ministero della Ricerca
Scienti®ca e Tecnologica (MURST).
5.07
10.8
17.44
5.57
2.57
29.30
<0.7
References and Notes
MMC
1. Carter, S. K.; Crooke, S. T. Mitomycin C; Current Status
and New Developments; Academic Press: New York, 1979.
2. Li, V. S.; Choi, D.; Wang, Z.; Jemenez, L. S.; Tang, M.;
Kohn, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2326.
3. Sartorelli, A. C.; Hodnick, W. F.; Belcourt, M. F.; Tomasz,
M.; Haty, B.; Fischer, J. J.; Rockwell, S. Oncol. Res. 1994, 6,
501.
aID50 drug dosage required to inhibit the cancer cell growth by 50%.
Table 2. Cytotoxicity of 1 and 2d on VERO cells
Compound
Conc. mM
Dye testa
Lowry's testb
4. Wang, S.; Kohn, H. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 788.
5. Speckamp, W. N.; Oostveen, E. A. Int. Patent WO 87/
06227, 1987.
6. Dirix, L. Y.; Tonnesen, F.; Cassidy, J.; Epelbaum, R.; Ten
Bokkel Huinink, W. W.; Pavlidis, N.; Sorio, R.; Gamucci, T.;
Wol, I.; Te Velde, A.; Lan, J.; Verwei, J. Eur. J. Cancer 1997,
32A, 2019.
Control
1
100
100
90
73.6
100.7
99.3
16.4
71.2
113.7
68.9
86.4
102.9
16.2
81.3
97.2
11.2
0.7
90
11.2
0.7
2d
7. Beall, H. D.; Hudnott, A. R.; Winsky, S.; Siegel, D.;
Swann, E.; Ross, D.; Moody, C. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
1998, 8, 545.
aPercent cellular growth.
bPercent protein content.
8. Rao, K. V.; Cullen, W. P. Antibiot. Ann. 1959, 950.
9. Rao, K. V.; Rock, C. P. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1996, 33, 447.
10. Fryatt, T.; Goroski, D. T.; Nilson, Z. D.; Moody, C. J.;
Beall, H. D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 2195.
11. Yoo, H. W.; Suh, M. E.; Park, S. W. J. Med. Chem. 1998,
41, 4716.
12. Antonini, I.; Claudi, F.; Cristalli, G.; Franchetti, P.; Gri-
fantini, M.; Martelli, S. J. Med. Chem. 1988, 31, 260.
13. Skibo, E. B.; Schulz, W. G. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 3050.
14. Skibo, E. B.; Islam, I.; Heileman, M. J.; Schulz, W. G. J.
Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 78.
15. Skibo, E. B. Curr. Med. Chem. 1996, 2, 900.
16. Zhou, R.; Skibo, E. B. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 4321.
17. Skibo, E. B.; Islam, I.; Schullz, W. G.; Zhou, R.; Bess, L.;
Boruah, R. Synlett 1996, 297.
18. Craigo, W. A.; LeSueur, B. W.; Skibo, E. B. J. Med.
Chem. 1999, 42, 3324.
compound 2d and MMC are equiactive. Compounds 1e
and 1f have a moderate inhibitor activity. In contrast,
all derivatives show no activity on breast adenocarci-
noma; the MMC standard also is not active in this
assay. Because of their interesting antiproliferative
activity, the in vitro toxicity of derivatives 1 and 2d on
VERO cells has been evaluated.24 As reported in Table
2 the data from the dye test and the Lowry's method for
protein content, show that compound 1 is well tolerated
at all the concentrations used in antiproliferative assay
(90±0.7 mM), while compound 2d is toxic only at high
concentration (90 mM). The results obtained do not
permit an analysis of structure±activity relationships,
however, it is evident that, in the ®rst series of com-
pounds (1, 1a±c, 1e±g) the substituents on the quinone
ring have a negative eect, perhaps due to steric hin-
drance: the most active derivative is unsubstituted.
Among the derivatives bearing the 2-pyridyl moiety at
C-2 (2a, 2c±e) 2d is the most active with an ID50 2.57
and 2.63 mM on SupT1 and Molt3, respectively. In this
case, the presence of the methoxy group is an important
feature, as it appears in many indole and quinoline qui-
nones. All derivatives bearing amine substituents at C-
5(6) (1a, 1b, 1g, 2a, 2e) are not active. Considering the
19. Middleton, R. W.; Monney, H.; Parrick, J. Synthesis,
1984, 740.
20. Weinberger, L.; Day, A. R. J. Org. Chem. 1959, 24, 1451.
1
21. Melting points, H NMR and elemental analysis data for
compounds 1, 1a±g, 2, 2a±e are available from the authors
upon request.
22. Ishioka, C.; Kanamaru, R.; Sato, T.; Dei, T.; Konishi, Y.;
Asamura, M.; Wakui, A. Cancer Res. 1988, 48, 2813.
23. Mosmann, T. J. Immunol. Meth. 1983, 65, 55.
24. Wilson, A. P. In Animal Cell Culture: A Practical
Approach; Freshney, R. I., Ed., IRL: Oxford, 1986; p. 183.