mesitylene bridge leads to a detectable enantiomeric dis-
crimination. Although the ee’s are not very high (2:L-Arg,
17%; 2:L-Lys, 33%), well-resolved NMR signals are pro-
duced during the NMR titration, so that optically pure 2 may
be used as a shift reagent for the quantitative determination
of the enantiomeric purity of arginine and lysine derivatives
(Figure 5).
able to undergo this typical hydrogen bond pattern. Whereas
in arginine this must be the R-NH3+ group, lysine probably
prefers the flexible and sterically mobile ꢀ-amino group. Now
three binding sites evolve in the amino acid molecules, with
each exhibiting a different binding strength. This is the
prerequisite for chemoselective and also enantioselective
recognition, met only by arginine and lysine in our experi-
ments.
Few host molecules with enantioselective recognition of
arginine and lysine have been published to date: Jung et al.
developed monolayers of cyclohexapeptides immobilized on
gold whose interactions with aqueous amino acid solutions
were transduced by changes of the resonance frequency of
a quartz crystal microbalance.10 Enantiomeric arginine and
lysine recognition has also been achieved by podand and
crown-type amide derivatives of the naturally occurring
monensin ionophore.11 Polyclonal antibodies can be used in
an enantioselective enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for
dinitrophenylamino acids.12 Finally, Famulok et al. used an
in vitro selection process to produce an L-citrullin binding
RNA aptamer, which was subjected to further evolution into
an L-arginine binder.13 All the above-mentioned methods,
Figure 5. Formation of the diastereomeric complexes can be
monitored as a typical signal splitting of distinct host NMR signals.
Different upfield shifts are observed for the two nonequivalent
aromatic receptor protons ortho to the phosphonate moiety in 2,
on complex formation with lysine methyl ester.
(10) Weiss, T.; Leipert, D.; Kaspar, M.; Jung, G.; Goepel, W. AdV. Mater.
1999, 11, 331-335.
(11) Maruyama, K.; Sohmiya, H.; Tsukube, H. Tetrahedron 1992, 48,
805-818.
(12) Hofstetter, H.; Hofstetter, O.; Wistuba, D. Anal. Chim. Acta 1996,
332, 285-290.
(13) Famulok, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 1698-1706.
(14) Dilithium bis(5,5′ethylphosphonato)-6,6′-dihydroxy-3,3,3′,3′-tet-
ramethyl-1,1′-spiro-bisindane 1: To a solution of 1 (0.3 mmol) in dry
methylbutyl ketone (15 mL) was added lithium bromide (0.6 mmol), and
the mixture was heated to reflux for 1 h. The white precipitate was filtered,
suspended in diethyl ether, and sonicated for 0.5 h. The solid was filtered
again and dried under reduced pressure at 130 °C over phosphorus
pentoxide: yield 95%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, [D6]DMSO) δ ) 0.79 (t, 6H,
3JHH ) 14.5 Hz), 1.01 (s, 6H), 1.07 (s, 6H), 1.87 (d, 2H, 2JHH ) 13.2 Hz),
Additional structural information from a careful analysis
of the NMR data provides a more detailed picture of the
molecular recognition of long basic amino acids by 2: The
signal splitting of an aromatic host proton observed in the
complex between 2 and arginine occurs at the opposite end
of 2 compared to its complex with lysine. Since this effect
must originate from an interaction of that host proton with
the chiral environment of the R-C atom, the amino acids
obviously prefer an opposite orientation in the complex.
Only one of the nonequivalent O-CH2 methylene groups in
2 shows a strong downfield shift during the titration (used
for Ka calculation). This correlates well with an additional
N-Hδ+‚‚‚Oδ- hydrogen bond observed in the energy mini-
mization process (Figure 6). Only an ammonium group is
2
4
1.99 (d, 2H, JHH ) 13.2 Hz), 3.38 (m, 4H), 5.69 (d, 2Harom, JHP ) 4.4
3
Hz), 6.94 (d, 2Harom, JHP ) 12.6 Hz); 13C NMR (126 MHz, [D6]DMSO)
3
δ ) 14.13, 16.86 (d, JCP ) 7.3 Hz), 22.03, 25.70, 30.03, 30.84, 32.10,
42.69, 57.34, 59.13, 59.26 (d, 1JCP ) 42.5 Hz), 110.17 (d, 3JCP ) 10.9 Hz),
125.43 (d, 2JCP ) 6.07 Hz), 141.34 (d, 3JCP ) 12.1 Hz), 154.21, 160.15 (d,
2JCP ) 7.28 Hz); 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, [D6]DMSO) δ ) 13.85 ppm;
FAB-MS m/z ) 537 (100%, M+); IR (cm-1) 2956, 2903, 1508, 1474, 1418,
1363, 1184, 1125, 1041, 946, 780. To get an analytically pure sample the
lithium salt was protonated with HCl and filtered and the resulting
bisphosphonic acid dried under reduced pressure; calcd C 57.21, H 6.53;
found C 57.90, H 7.00. Dilithium bis(5,5′-ethylphosphonato)-6,6′-(2,4,5-
trimethyl-1,3-benzyloxy)-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethyl-1,1′-spiro-bisindane 2: To
a solution of 2 (0.3 mmol) in dry acetonitrile (15 mL) was added lithium
bromide (0.6 mmol), and the mixture was heated to reflux for 100 h. The
white precipitate was filtered, suspended in diethyl ether, and sonicated for
0.5 h. The solid was filtered again and dried under reduced pressure at 130
°C over phosphorus pentoxide: yield 90%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, [D4]-
methanol) δ ) 1.20 (s, 3H), 1.32 (t, 3H, 3JHH ) 14.5 Hz), 1.35 (t, 3H, 3JHH
2
) 14.5 Hz), 1.36 (s, 6H), 1.37 (s, 3H), 1.63 (s, 3H), 1.81 (d, 1H, JHH
)
12.6 Hz), 1.92 (d, 1H, 2JHH ) 12.7 Hz), 2.30 (d, 1H, 2JHH ) 12.6 Hz), 2.40
(d, 1H, 2JHH ) 12.0 Hz), 2.41 (s, 3H), 2.57 (s, 3H), 3.84 (m, 1H), 3.93 (m,
2
2
1H), 3.98 (m, 2H), 5.28 (dd, 2H, JHH ) 95.2 Hz), 5.29 (d, 2H, JHH
)
22.05 Hz), 5.53 (d, 1Harom
Hz), 6.83 (s, 1Harom); 7.54 (d, 1Harom
,
4JHP ) 5.1 Hz), 6.04 (d, 1Harom
,
4JHP ) 5.1
,
3JHP ) 13.9 Hz), 7.78 (d, 1Harom
,
3JHP ) 13.3 Hz); 13C NMR (126 MHz, [D4]methanol) δ ) 14.88, 17.11
(m), 19.84, 21.80, 31.02, 31.39, 31.70, 43.93, 44.00, 58.91, 59.12, 59.71,
61.08 (d, 2JCP ) 6.06 Hz), 61.26 (d, 2JCP ) 6.06 Hz), 65.35, 72.24, 109.46
(d, 3JCP ) 9.72 Hz), 121.64 (d, 3JCP ) 10.9 Hz), 123.63 (d, 1JCP ) 175.93
Hz), 129.38 (d, 2JCP ) 6.07 Hz), 129.61 (d, 2JCP ) 6.07 Hz), 130.31, 132.23,
132.32, 132.35, 138.01, 139.63, 141.07, 143.61 (d, 3JCP ) 13.3 Hz), 149.70
Figure 6. Energy-minimized structure of the proposed complex
geometry for Lys-2. Note the additional H-bond to the only
accessible ether oxygen on the left, which determines the relational
orientation of both partners.
3
4
2
(d, JCP ) 13.36 Hz), 153.77 (d, JCP ) 2.43 Hz), 154.49, 158.76 (d, JCP
) 2.42 Hz), 160.90 (d, JCP ) 2.42 Hz); 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, [D4]-
2
methanol) δ ) 12.90/14.09; FAB-MS m/z ) 681 (0.6%, M+); IR (cm-1
)
2956, 2870, 2900, 1508, 1474, 1396, 1362, 1200, 1185, 1125, 1046, 700,
781; (2 + H2O) calcd C 61.53, H 6.93; found C 61.94, H 6.73.
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 5, 2000
607