F. C J. M. van Veggel, D. N. Reinhoudt et al.
FULL PAPER
δ ϭ 1.29 [s, 36 H, C(CH3)3], 4.04 (s, 8 H, CH2S), 6.92 (s, 2 H, Ar
H), 7.19 (d, J ϭ 8.6 Hz, 8 H, SAr), 7.27 (d, J ϭ 8.6 Hz, 8 H, SAr).
Acknowledgments
Financial support of this research by the Council for the Chemical
Sciences of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
(CW-NWO) is gratefully acknowledged.
Ϫ
13C NMR: δ ϭ 31.3, 34.5, 36.7, 130.8, 132.4, 132.8, 134.9, 150.1.
Ϫ
FAB-MS; m/z: 625.2 [M
Ϫ Ϫ
SAr]ϩ, calcd. 625.3.
C50H62S4·0.5H2O: calcd. C 75.04, H 7.93, S 16.03; found C 75.01,
H 7.86, S 15.90.
[1]
These tridentate ligands are usually abbreviated as NCN, PCP
Bis(acetonitrile) Complex of Pd Dipincer 3: Dipincer ligand 6 (213
mg, 0.3 mmol) was dissolved in CH3CN (40 mL) and the solution
was placed under argon. Pd[MeCN]4(BF4)2 (240 mg, 0.6 mmol)
was added in one portion, and the mixture was heated at reflux
overnight. After evaporation of the solvent, the crude product was
taken up in CH3CN (5 mL) and precipitated by dropwise addition
of Et2O. Yield: 203 mg (60%). Ϫ M.p. Ͼ 280 °C (dec.). Ϫ 1H NMR
(CD3CN): δ ϭ 1.33 [s, 36 H, C(CH3)3], 4.61 (br s, 8 H, CH2S), 7.56
(d, J ϭ 8.8 Hz, 8 H, SAr H), 7.74 (d, J ϭ 8.8 Hz, 8 H, SAr H). Ϫ
13C NMR (CD3CN): δ ϭ 30.8, 35.2, 50.0, 127.8, 127.9, 132.0,
and SCS ligands.
[2] [2a]
A. Weisman, M. Gozin, H.-B. Kraatz, D. Milstein, Inorg.
[2b]
Chem. 1996, 35, 1792, and references cited therein. Ϫ
P.
Steenwinkel, R. A. Gossage, G. van Koten, Chem. Eur. J. 1998,
4, 759, and references cited therein.
Only one PtII SCS pincer complex has been reported: G. S.
Hanan, J. E. Kickham, S. J. Loeb, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Com-
mun. 1991, 893.
[3]
[4]
[5]
[4a] J. E. Kickham, S. J. Loeb, S. L. Murphy, Chem. Eur. J. 1997,
[4b]
3, 1203 Ϫ
J. R. Hall, S. J. Loeb, G. K. H. Shimizu, G. P.
A. Yap, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 121.
[5a]
Recent reviews on metallodendrimers:
G. R. Newkome, E.
145.8, 155.2. Ϫ FAB-MS; m/z: 1001.1 [M Ϫ 2MeCN Ϫ 2BF4
ϩ
[5b]
He, C. N. Moorefield, Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 1689 Ϫ
M. A.
H]ϩ, calcd. 1001.2. Ϫ C52H65B2F8NOPd2S4·2H2O: calcd. C 49.15,
H 5.47, N 1.10 S 10.09; found C 48.86, H 5.14, N 1.25, S 10.00
(the found values for the elemental composition correspond to the
substitution of one acetonitrile ligand by water, which probably
occurs upon prolonged standing).
Hearshaw, J. R. Moss, Chem. Commun. 1999, 1. Ϫ [5c]C. Gor-
man, Adv. Mater. 1998, 10, 295.
[6]
W. T. S. Huck, F. C. J. M. van Veggel, D. N. Reinhoudt, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1213.
[7] [7a]
W. T. S. Huck, F. C. J. M. van Veggel, B. L. Kropman, D.
H. A. Blank, E. G. Keim, M. M. A. Smithers, D. N. Reinhoudt,
[7b]
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8293. Ϫ
W. T. S. Huck, F.
Crystal Structure Determinations of 1 and 3·(PPh3)2: Crystals suit-
able for X-ray structure determination were mounted on a Lindem-
ann-glass capillary and transferred into the cold nitrogen stream of
the diffractometer. Data were collected with a Nonius Kappa CCD
diffractometer on rotating anode (Mo-Kα radiation, graphite mon-
C. J. M. van Veggel, D. N. Reinhoudt, J. Mater. Chem. 1997,
7, 1213.
[8]
W. T. S. Huck, L. J. Prins, R. H. Fokkens, N. M. M. Nibbering,
F. C. J. M. van Veggel, D. N. Reinhoudt, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1998, 120, 6240.
J. E. Kickham, S. J. Loeb, Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 4351.
For example, see: M. Fujita, F. Ibukuro, H. Hagihara, K. Og-
ura, Nature 1994, 367, 720.
M. L. Tobe, J. Burgess, Inorganic Reaction Mechanisms, Long-
man, Essex, 1999.
M. Oki, ‘‘Applications of Dynamic NMR Spectroscopy to Or-
ganic Chemistry’’, Methods in Stereochemical Analysis, vol. 4,
VCH, Weinheim, 1985.
H. C. Brown, Y. Okamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 4979.
M. Gozin, A. Weisman, Y. Ben-David, D. Milstein, Nature
[9]
˚
ochromator, λ ϭ 0.71073 A, T ϭ 150 K, ϕ and ω scans). Pertinent
[10]
data for the structure determinations are collected in Table 4.
Structures were solved with automated Patterson and subsequent
difference Fourier methods for structure 1 and direct methods for
structure 3·(PPh3)2, using SHELXS86[20] for both structures. Full-
matrix refinement on F2 was performed with SHELXL-97Ϫ2.[21]
The hydrogen atoms of structure 1 were located on a difference
Fourier map and their coordinates were included as parameters in
the refinement; the hydrogen atoms of 3·(PPh3)2 were included in
the refinement on calculated positions riding on their carrier atoms.
The nonhydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displace-
ment parameters. The hydrogen atoms were refined with a fixed
isotropic displacement parameter related to the value of the equiva-
lent isotropic displacement parameter of their carrier atoms. The
tBu groups of 3·(PPh3)2 were refined with a disorder model invol-
ving two sites. The BF4Ϫ counteranions and the chloroform solvent
molecules of this compound were also disordered. Since no satis-
factory disorder model could be obtained the contribution of the
disordered region to the structure factors was taken into account
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
1993, 364, 699.
[15]
´
R. A. T. M. Abbenhuis, I. Del Rıo, M. M. Bergshoef, J.
Boersma, N. Veldman, A. L. Spek, G. van Koten, Inorg. Chem.
1998, 37, 1749.
[16]
[17]
J. Errington, W. S. McDonald, B. L. Shaw, J. Chem. Soc., Dal-
ton Trans. 1980, 2312.
S. J. Loeb, G. K. H. Shimizu, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1993, 1395.
[18]
[19]
C. A. Tolman, Chem. Rev. 1977, 77, 313.
Isothiocyanates were found to be too weak to displace the ace-
1
tonitrile from complex 1. In the H NMR spectrum (CDCl3),
the diagnostic signal shift from δ ϭ 2.08 (coordinated CH3CN)
to δ ϭ 1.99 (uncoordinated CH3CN) was not observed upon
addition of butyl isothiocyanate to the acetonitrile complex 1.
FT-IR spectroscopy also failed to demonstrate the coordina-
tion of isothiocyanate to PdII.
using the SQUEEZE procedure as incorporated in PLATON.[22]
A
total of 219 eϪ were found in a cavity of 537 A , located at the
inversion center on (0,0,0). Neutral atom scattering factors and an-
omalous dispersion corrections were taken from the International
Tables for Crystallography.[23] Geometrical calculations were per-
formed with PLATON.[22] Crystallographic data (excluding struc-
ture factors) for the structures reported in this paper have been
deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as
supplementary publication nos. CCDC-141832 [for 3 · (PPh3)2]
and -141833 (for 1). Copies of the data can be obtained free
of charge on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge
3
˚
[20]
[21]
[22]
G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXS86 Program for crystal structure de-
termination, University of Göttingen, Germany, 1986.
G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXL-97Ϫ2 Program for crystal structure
refinement, University of Göttingen, Germany, 1997.
A. L. Spek, PLATON, A multi-purpose crystallographic tool,
Utrecht University, The Netherlands, 2000; Internet: http://
www.cryst.chem.uu.nl/platon/
[23]
A. J. C. Wilson (Ed.), International Tables for Crystallography,
vol. C, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The
Netherlands, 1992.
CB2 1EZ, UK [Fax: (internat.)
deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk].
ϩ 44-1223/336-033; E-mail:
Received March 21, 2000
[I00103]
2540
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 2533Ϫ2540