Chemistry Letters 2000
1395
In a similar way, we also examined the dianion rearrange-
ment of benzyl propargyl ether where the conjugation with the
allenic form would be inhibited (Scheme 2, Table 2). As expect-
ed, when the rearrangement of 1c was performed in ether the
ortho-[2,3]-shift competed considerably with the [1,2]-shift
(entry 1).10 Rather surprisingly, however, when the rearrange-
ment was conducted in THF the α'-[1,2]-Wittig product 6c aris-
ing from lithiation at the benzyl position (α') was formed as the
major product (entry 2). That means that the second lithiation
involved occurs predominantly at the propargylic position in
ether and at the benzylic position in THF. At present, the exact
reason for the regiochemical changeover is unclear. We also car-
ried out the rearrangement of the α-methylbenzyl analog (1d)
where the lithiation at the benzylic position might be consider-
ably suppressed. Indeed, the rearrangement in ether gave the α-
lithiation-derived ortho-[2,3]- (3d) and [1,2]-product (4d) in 22%
and 51% yield, respectively (entry 3).11 In THF, nearly the same
ratio for [2,3]- vs [1,2]-product was observed, accompanied by
the formation of the α'-[1,2]-product 6d (entry 4). Furthermore,
the rearrangement of the α-methylpropargyl analog (1e) in ether
was found to result in the exclusive formation of the α-[1,2]- (4e)
and α'-[1,2]-product (6e) without any detectable formation of the
ortho-[2,3]-product.12 This observation indicates that the dilithio
species generated from the α-methylpropargyl moiety can no
longer act as a migrating terminus for the ortho-[2,3]-Wittig shift.
The overall spectrum of the periselectivity observed herein
reveals that a key structural factor for effecting the ortho-[2,3]-
Wittig rearrangement is not the HOMO level of the carbanion
terminus involved, but its kinetic stability toward the radical
cleavage leading to the competing [1,2]-Wittig shift. In other
words, the more the [1,2]-Wittig shift is suppressed, the more
the ortho-[2,3]-Wittig produst is formed. The same argument
could be extended to explain why α-benzylthio carbanions and
S- and N-benzyl ylides can easily undergo the ortho-[2,3]-shift.
In summary, we have shown that benzyl γ-(trimethylsilyl)-
propargyl ether (1a), when treated with n-BuLi, undergoes the
rarely precedent ortho-[2,3]-Wittig rearrangement in remark-
ably large preference to the competing [1,2]- and [1,4]-shifts.
Furthermore, we have pointed out the importance of the kinetic
stability of the carbanion terminus toward the radical cleavage
as a key factor directing the rearrangement to the ortho-[2,3]-
Wittig shift.
References and Notes
1
2
Reviews: a) T. Nakai and K. Mikami, Chem. Rev., 86, 885
(1986). b) T. Nakai and K. Mikami, Org. React., 46, 105
(1994).
a) G. Wittig and L. Lmann, Liebigs Ann. Chem., 550, 260
(1942). b) H. Felkin and C. Frajerman, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1977, 3485. c) K. Tomooka, K.Yamamoto, and T. Nakai,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 38, 3741 (1999).
3
4
a) K. Tomooka, T. Igarashi, and T. Nakai, Tetrahedron, 50,
5927 (1994). b) K. Tomooka, H. Yamamoto, and T.Nakai,
Liebigs Ann./Recueil, 1997, 1275.
U. Schölkopf, K. Fellenberger, and M. Rizk, Liebigs Ann.
Chem., 734, 106 (1970). In this paper, any mechanistic
reason for the exceptional periselectivity has not been
given. Note that a similar [2,3]-Wittig shift has been
reported in the carbanion rearrangement of several 3-furyl-
methyl ethers: B. Cazes and S. Julia, Synth. Commun.,
1977, 113; M. Tsubuki, H. Okita, and T. Honda, J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995, 2135 .
5
6
K. Brickmann and R. Brkner, Chem. Ber., 126, 1227
(1993).
Review: I. Markó, “Comprehensive Organic Synthesis,”ed.
by G. Pattenden, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1991), Vol. 3,
p. 913.
7
Note that the ortho-[2,3]-Wittig shift requires benzylic
ethers as substrates which could be lithiated on the benzyl-
oxy-bearing carbon preferentially over the benzylic carbon.
In this regard, allyl benzyl ether, e.g., is not qualified as an
substrate, since its lithiation occurs exclusively on the ben-
zylic carbon.
1
8
9
The three products are distinguishable by H NMR spectra
(CDCl3): 3a, δ 2.44 (s, o-Me) and δ 5.60 (d, CH–OH); 4a,
δ 2.95–3.06 (m, CH2Ph) and δ 4.53–4.59 (m, CH–OH); 5a,
δ 10.01 (d, CHO), and δ 6.32 (dt, =CHCHO).
1
The H NMR spectra of products 3b, 4b, and 5b are in
accord with the assigned structures.
10 The three products are distinguishable by 1H NMR spectra:
3c, δ 2.45 (s, o-Me), δ 5.63 (d, CH–OH), and δ 2.65 (d,
HC≡ ); 4c, δ 2.97–3.09 (m, CH2Ph), δ 4.59 (ddd,
CH–OH), and δ 2.50 (d, HC≡ ); 6c, δ 4.88 (t, CH–OH), δ
2.65 (ddd, CH2C≡ ), and δ 2.08 (t, HC≡ ).
1
11 The H NMR spectra of products 3d, 4d, and 6d are in
accord with the assigned structures.
12 1H NMR (CDCl3): 4e, δ 2.94, 3.00 (dd, CH2Ph) and δ
1.56 (s, Me–C–OH); 6e, δ 4.52 (d, CH–OH) and δ 1.11
(d, Me–CH).