R. Delatouche et al. / European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics xxx (2013) xxx–xxx
3
azide group or to add detectable properties for in vivo imaging
[25]. The conversion of the alcohols 8 to ethers 3 is expected to in-
crease the hydrophobic character of the molecules, but on the
other hand, this strategy also avoids the protection/deprotection
of the terminal primary hydroxy group prior to drug insertion that
could make the approach more complex. Blocking this primary hy-
droxyl group for drug insertion is necessary as we demonstrated
previously that primary alcohols can be used as drugs with our sys-
tem [23c]. Thus, preparing prodrugs from alcohols 8a–c could give
intermolecular attack of these alcohols to yield undesired polymers
instead of the expected alkyne-free prodrugs. A spacer R2, selected
to be biologically inert and to potentially improve the water solu-
bility, was inserted between the two click sites to account for the
bulkiness of the pH responsive part. Spacers are usually necessary
to make the reactive site of prodrugs easily accessible especially
when enzymes are involved in the releasing mechanism.
We report in this work our synthetic findings to obtain a differ-
entiated double azide–alkyne click chemistry on the same struc-
ture, its application to the preparation of new clickable pH
responsive HDACi prodrugs and their biological evaluations
(Scheme 1, drug = HDAC inhibitor (HDACi)). Three versions were
prepared (various R1 groups) for each HDACi and were evaluated
in cancer cells for their ability to release the inhibitors with resto-
ration of HDAC inhibition measured by a BRET assay. The final im-
pact on cancer cell viability was also measured.
(0.052 g, 0.073 mmol, 17%). The unreacted alcohol 3a is also recov-
ered. Method B: To a solution of 3a (0.11 g, 0.25 mmol, 1 eq.) in dry
toluene under nitrogen atmosphere was added AcCl (0.09 mL,
1.25 mmol, 5 eq.). After 2 h reflux, the solution was evaporated to
give the crude chloride 10a as oil. The addition of SAHA, work-
up, and purification was performed as for method A. Compound
4a was obtained in better yields with method
B (0.075 g,
0.107 mmol, 42%). The unreacted alcohol 3a (0.010 g, 10%) and
SAHA (0.124 g, 36%)) were also recovered.
TLC MeOH/CH2Cl2/Et3N 5:94:1 Rf = 0.33; 1H NMR (400 MHz,
Acetone-D6): d = 9.75 (s, 1H), 9.08 (s, 1H), 7.69–7.65 (m, 3H),
7.46–7.41 (m, 4H), 7.34–7.25 (m, 8H), 7.04–7.00 (m, 1H), 4.57 (t,
2H, J = 5.1 Hz), 4.16 (d, 2H, J = 2.4 Hz), 3.88 (t, 2H, J = 5.2 Hz),
3.62–3.55 (m, 6H), 3.53–3.49 (m, 6H), 2.93 (t, 2H, J = 2.4 Hz), 2.31
(t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 1.93 (t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.60 (m, 2H), 1.39 (m,
2H), 1.25 (m, 2H), 1.12 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, Acetone-
D6): d = 26.0, 33.7, 37.7., 50.8, 58.6, 69.8, 70.1, 70.9, 71.1, 71.16,
71.2, 71.22, 75.8, 80.9, 115.7, 119.9, 123.8, 126.7, 128.5, 128.6,
129.2, 129.4, 133.6, 140.8, 161,0, 172,0; HRESI-MS: calcd. for
[M+Na]+ (C40H49N5O7Na): 734.35242, found: 734.3524.
2.2.2. Typical synthesis of compound 5
N-(2-((1-(3,6,9,12-tetraoxapentadec-14-ynyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-
4-yl) diphenylmethyl amino) phenyl)-4-acetamidobenzamide 5a.
Chloride 10a was prepared as above and dissolved in minimum
ACN (2–3 mL), and the resulting solution was added to a solution
of CI-994 (0.231 g, 0.90 mmol) in ACN (5 mL) containing Et3N
(0.24 mL, 1.72 mmol). The solution was stirred 12 h at ambient
temperature and concentrated, and the crude material was dis-
solved in acetone from which the unreacted CI-994 was precipi-
tated and filtered off for recycling. The filtrate was purified
(Combi Flash DCM/MeOH/Et3N 97:2:1) to give 5a as an oil
(0.142 mg, 0.17 mmol, 39%). The unreacted alcohol 3a was also
recovered. 1H NMR (400 MHz, Acetone-D6): d = 9.44 (bs, 2H),
8.02 (d, 2H, J = 8.6 Hz), 7.82 (s, 1H), 7.77 (d, 2H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.65
(m, 4H), 7.24 (m, 5H), 7.18 (m, 2H), 6.70 (dt, 1H, J = 1.6 Hz,
J = 8.1 Hz), 6.61 (dt, 1H, J = 1.3 Hz, J = 7.5 Hz), 6.17 (dd, 1H,
J = 1.1 Hz, J = 8.2 Hz), 6.12 (s, 1H), 4.50 (t, 2H, J = 5.2 Hz), 4.14 (d,
2H, J = 2.4 Hz), 3.79 (t, 2H, J = 4.9 Hz), 3.59 (m, 2H), 3.55 (m, 2H),
3.48 (m, 4H), 3.43 (m, 4H), 2.92 (t, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz), 2.12 (s, 3H);
13C NMR (100 MHz, Acetone-D6): d = 169.3, 152.9, 146.5, 143.5,
141.9, 129.9, 129.5, 128.9, 128.8, 127.7, 127.5, 126.8, 126.5,
125.9, 119.2, 118.6, 118.1, 81.0, 75.8, 71.21, 71.17, 71.0, 70.2,
69.8, 65.7, 58.6, 50.9, 24.4, 22.9, 15.2; HRESI-MS: calcd. for
[M+Na]+ (C41H44N6O6Na): 739.32145, found: 739.3215.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Materials
All solvents were dried before use when required with classical
methods. Distilled water was used for cycloaddition under Sharp-
less conditions. 250 lm silica gel plates were used for TLC analysis.
All reactions were conducted under nitrogen, and concentrations
were performed under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator.
Extracted organic layers were dried with MgSO4 and the solvents
removed under reduced pressure. Purifications were made by col-
umn chromatography with silica gel (35–70 lm silica) or using
Combi Flash apparatus for compound 4 and 5. DCM = CH2Cl2,
THF = tetrahydrofuran, EA = ethyl acetate, PE = petroleum ether
35–60°, ACN = acetonitrile. 1H (400 MHz) and 13C (100 MHz)
NMR spectra are given in ppm as referenced to TMS (tetramethyl-
silane) as internal standard. 1H NMR coupling constants are re-
ported in Hertz and refer to apparent multiplicities and not true
coupling constants. Data are reported as follows: chemical shift,
multiplicity (s = singlet, br s = broad singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet,
q = quartet, m = multiplet, dd = doublets of doublets, etc.), integra-
tion, and coupling constant. HRMS were performed in the Centre
Régional de Mesures Physiques de l’Ouest, Université de Rennes
1, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes, France.
2.2.3. Determination of hydrolysis rates of prodrugs in mildly acidic pH
The compounds 4a–c and 5a–c were submitted to acidic hydro-
lyzes with buffered solutions. 0.4 mL of a 0.5 mg/mL solution of the
compounds in ACN was added to 1.6 mL of buffer under vigorous
stirring. At this concentration, no precipitation of the starting com-
pound was observed for any of the derivatives analyzed. HPLC of the
starting prodrugs and buffers alone in the mixture of ACN/H2O used
for hydrolysis conditions were used to validate the drug release and
reformation of alcohols 3. No unknown products were formed in
these conditions. The acidity is being probably not strong enough
for Ritter reaction with ACN [26]. The final solutions tested were
thus composed of 20:80 ratio of acetonitrile/buffer with pH values
in the range 4.3, 5.0, 6.0, and 7.3. The clear solution was then in-
jected at different times directly with an automated High Pressure
Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) apparatus equipped with a DAD
Hitachi L-2455 (detection range: 200–400 nm), an autosampler
Hitachi L-2200, a pump Hitachi L-2130, and a reversed phase HPLC
column Lichrocart 150-4,6 purospher STAR (Supplementary infor-
mation for eluting systems). The peaks corresponding to the start-
ing material and the released alcohols were integrated and
2.2. Methods
2.2.1. Typical synthesis of compound 4
N-phenyl-N0-[[1-[2-[2-[2-(2-prop-2-ynoxyethoxy) ethoxy] eth-
oxy] ethyl] triazol-4-yl]-bis(phenyl) methoxy] octanediamide 4a.
Method A: To a solution of 3a (0.20 g, 0.43 mmol) in DCM (5 mL)
was added HCl (2 M in Et2O, 0.3 mL, 0.86 mmol). After 2 h reflux,
the solution was co-evaporated with toluene to give the crude
chloride 10a as oil. To a solution of SAHA (0.340 g, 0.129 mmol)
and dry NEt3 (0.24 mL, 1.72 mmol) in ACN (5 mL) was added the
crude chloride 10a dissolved in a minimum of ACN at ambient
temperature. The resulting solution was stirred overnight at room
temperature, then filtered, and washed with ACN to recover unre-
acted SAHA as a solid. The concentrated filtrate was purified by
Combi Flash (DCM/EtOH/Et3N 94:5:1) to give 4a as a colorless oil
Please cite this article in press as: R. Delatouche et al., Design of pH responsive clickable prodrugs applied to histone deacetylase inhibitors: A new strategy