adopted. Homologation of unpurified 10 using Ohira’s
reagent 128 yielded alkyne 11 in 94% yield. The one-pot
hydroboration/chlorination sequence developed by Masuda9
was then employed to afford vinyl chloride (+)-8 in 70%
yield as a single olefin isomer (>20:1).
Scheme 1
Vinyl chloride (+)-8 proved resistant to Simmons-Smith
cyclopropanation. Less than 15% conversion was observed
using either the Furukawa10 or Denmark11 reaction variants.
These failures prompted investigation of the highly activated
conditions developed by Shi, in which Et2Zn is premixed
with 1 equiv of trifluoroacetic acid prior to the addition of
1 equiv of CH2I2.12 This dramatically enhanced carbenoid
delivered chlorocyclopropane 13 as a single diastereomer
(>50:1)13 in 82% yield (Scheme 3). This result illustrates
Scheme 3
would arise from a diastereoselective cyclopropanation of
vinyl chloride 8.
While the Takai reaction6 of glyceraldehyde cyclohexyl-
idene ketal 107 was initially investigated to afford vinyl
chloride (+)-8, the reaction exhibited modest selectivity (87:
13) and yields (Scheme 2). Significantly, the olefin isomers
Reaction conditions: (a) Et2Zn, CF3COOH, CH2I2, CH2Cl2, rt;
(b) Dowex resin, MeOH, rt; (c) Pb(OAc)4, K2CO3, CH2Cl2, rt; (d)
PPh3, CBr4, CH2Cl2, rt.
Scheme 2
that the Shi conditions can be used for directed cyclopro-
panations of electron-deficient olefins.
Removal of the cyclohexylidene protecting group initially
proved difficult due to reketalization during in vacuo
concentration. However, washing the methanolic reaction
solution with hexanes prior to concentration removed the
cyclohexanone dimethyl ketal and allowed the isolation of
diol 14 in 84% yield (Scheme 3). Diol 14 was converted to
the desired dibromide (-)-5 in two steps (Scheme 3). Diol
cleavage with potassium carbonate-buffered lead tetraacetate
afforded the volatile aldehyde 16 which was treated with 5
equiv of the Corey-Fuchs reagent14 without purification to
Reaction conditions: (a) KIO4, KHCO3, THF/H2O, rt; (b) CrCl2,
CHCl3, THF, 70 °C; (c) 12, K2CO3, MeOH, rt; (d) (i) Thexyl2BH,
-15 to 0 °C, THF, (ii) CuCl2, H2O, HMPA, THF, 0 to 70 °C.
(6) Takai, K.; Nitta, K.; Utimoto, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 7408-
7410.
(7) Aldehyde 10 was prepared by the method of: Schmid, C.; Bradley,
D. A. Synthesis 1992, 587-590.
(8) (a) Ohira, S. Synth. Commun. 1989, 19, 561-564. (b) Mu¨ller, S.;
Liepold, B.; Roth, G. J.; Bestmann, H. J. Synlett 1996, 521-522.
(9) Masuda, Y.; Hoshi, M.; Arase, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1992, 2725-2726.
(10) Furukawa, J.; Kawabata, N.; Nishimura. J. Tetrahedron 1968, 24,
53-58.
(11) Denmark, S.; O′Connor, S. P. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 3390-3401.
(12) Yang, Z.; Lorenz, J. C.; Shi, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 8621-
8624.
(13) The diastereoselectivity was verified by independent synthesis of a
mixture of cyclopropane diastereomers, which were distinguishable by gas
chromatography (see Supporting Information).
were not readily separated by chromatography. As an
alternative, an improved two-step stereospecific route was
(3) (a) Nicolaou, K. C.; Zipkin, R. E.; Dolle, R. E.; Harris, B. D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 3548-3551. (b) Nicolaou, K. C.; Chung, Y. S.;
Hernandez, P. E.; Taffer, I. M.; Zipkin, R. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27,
1881-1882. (c) Nicolaou K. C.; Webber, S. E. Chem. Commun. 1986,
1816-1817.
(4) Shen, W.; Wang, L. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 8873-8879.
(5) (a) Roush, W. R.; Moriarty, K. J.; Brown, B. B. Tetrahedron Lett.
1990, 31, 6509-6512. (b) Frank, S. A.; Chen, H.; Kunz, R. K.; Schnad-
erbeck, M. J.; Roush, W. R. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2691-2694.
(14) Corey, E. J.; Fuchs, P. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1972, 23, 3769-3772.
504
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 4, 2001