Not surprisingly, porphyrins are the easiest of the mac-
rocyclic tetrapyrroles to prepare, since the ring itself is very
stable and has no stereogenic centers. Successful synthetic
efforts in this area date back over 65 years.4a In contrast,
few general methods are available for synthesizing members
of the hydroporphyrin class of tetrapyrroles. Most efforts in
this area have focused on “semisynthesis”, involving trans-
formations of more readily accessible precursors. These
include reactions occurring at the periphery of porphyrins,4
such as oxidation,4b reduction,4c and various cycloadditions;4d
tautomerization of porphyrinogens and related materials;4e
and modifications of naturally occurring chlorins and
bacteriochlorins.1e,3
and sulfolane as solvent (110 °C), these authors obtained
yields of bonellin derivatives in the range 55-75%, on scales
of 10-20 mg. Finally, Lindsey et al. have recently extended
this methodology to include the synthesis of meso-substituted
chlorins. Zn(II)-complexed chlorins were obtained in up to
a 10% yield, on an ∼20 mg scale.9
A number of challenges remain in chlorin synthesis. For
example, the preparation of monocyclic precursors of type
1-4 is not trivial and often requires separation of mixtures
after lengthy reaction sequences. Second, it would be useful
to have more flexibility in the introduction of meso-
substituents, of potential importance in the design of PDT
agents (vide supra). Third, new methodology should be
adaptable to the synthesis of enantiomerically pure chlorins.
And finally, experimental procedures should be simplified
and be capable of implementation on larger scales.9b
One means of addressing these issues would employ a
variant of the MacDonald porphyrin synthesis (Figure 3).
The vast majority of de novo chlorin syntheses are
modeled after the Battersby methodology (Figure 2), which
Figure 2. Battersby-Montforts synthesis of chlorins.
was elegantly employed in the first rational synthesis of
bonellin.5 In its most general form, this strategy is based
upon either a photochemical or thermally induced ring
closure of a properly substituted bilatriene 5 (X ) OMe,
Br). Bilatrienes 5, in turn, are constructed from monocyclic
building blocks of type 1-4, which are typically joined by
means of either a sulfide contraction6 or a thio-Wittig
reaction7 or a related technique. The thermal cyclization
conditions require copper chelation for activation (X ) Br)
and afford chlorins 6 in 5-10% yield after decomplexation.
The photochemical ring closure is higher yielding (∼20%;
X ) OMe) but requires up to 1 week of irradiation of very
dilute solutions. Both procedures are carried out on milligram
quantities.
Figure 3. “MacDonald-Like” Approach to Chlorins.
The precursors 7 and 8 are in the proper oxidation state for
direct condensation to afford chlorins 9 (-2 H2O), and
macrocycle formation should be facile.10 Surprisingly, how-
ever, this approach to chlorins has not been described, most
likely due to difficulties in preparing A,B-ring dialdehydes
of type 7. In this paper we describe a general synthesis of 7
and the successful incorporation into chlorins of type 9.
Our synthetic plan for 7 took advantage of the ready
availability of alkyne acids 10 and iodopyrroles 11 (Scheme
1).11 Recently we employed these materials to prepare
enantiomerically pure dihydropyrromethenones 13, the first
step of which involved Pd0-initiated coupling-cyclization
to afford enelactones 12.11a Aminolysis of 12 at -33 °C,
followed by keto-amide cyclization, then gave 13 in excellent
overall yield. We hoped to extend this work to the synthesis
A significant improvement to this methodology was
developed by Montforts et al., who employed Zn(II) as a
template and carried out the cyclization of 5 by employing
base catalysis (Figure 2, X ) Br, I).8 With DBU as base,
(4) (a) Rothemund, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1935, 57, 2010. (b) Inhoffen,
H. H.; Nolte, W. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1969, 167. (c) Bonnett, R.; White, R.
D.; Winfield, U.-J.; Berenbaum, M. C. Biochem. J. 1989, 261, 277. (d)
Tome´, A. C.; Lacerda, P. S. S.; Neves, M. G. P. M. S.; Cavaleiro, J. A. S.
Chem. Commun. 1997, 1199. (e) Burns, D. H.; Shi, D. C.; Lash, T. D.
Chem. Commun. 2000, 299. See also refs 1 and 9a.
(5) (a) Battersby, A. R.; Dutton, C. J.; Fookes, C. J. R.; Turner, S. P.
D.; J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1983, 1235. (b) Battersby, A. R.; Dutton,
C. J.; Fookes, C. J. R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1988, 1569.
(6) Eschenmoser, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1988, 27, 5, and
references therein.
(8) (a) Montforts, F.-P.; Schwartz, U. M.; Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1991, 709.
(b) Abels, Y.; Montforts, F.-P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 1745, and
references therein.
(9) (a) Strachan, J.-P.; O’Shea, D. F.; Balasubramanian, T.; Lindsey, J.
S. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 3160. (b) According to one practitioner, “rational
routes to chlorins ... have typically required such synthetic mastery that
implementation has been confined to Elite specialists”.9a
(10) Arsenault, G. P.; Bullock, E.; MacDonald, S. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1960, 82, 4384.
(11) (a) Jacobi, P. A.; Liu, H. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 1778, and
references therein. See also: (b) Schreiber, S. L.; Klimas, M. T.; Sammakia,
T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5749.
(7) Bishop, J. E.; O’Connell, J. F.; Rapoport, H. J. Org. Chem. 1991,
56, 5079.
832
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 6, 2001