2456
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2456-2457
Selective Anion Binding by a Macrocycle with
Convergent Hydrogen Bonding Functionality
Kihang Choi and Andrew D. Hamilton*
Department of Chemistry, Yale UniVersity
New HaVen, Connecticut 06520
ReceiVed NoVember 8, 2000
A key problem in supramolecular chemistry is the design of
synthetic receptors with convergent binding groups that are
arranged to match the functionality of the guest molecule.1 Such
receptors should have not only high affinity but also the improved
selectivity that is important for sensing applications. In particular,
many anions have diverse geometries that offer a possible route
to the development of shape-selective anion receptors.2 Although
we and others3 have made extensive use of hydrogen bonding to
recognize anions, rarely have the binding groups been arranged
in a convergent and rigid manner. Notable exceptions include
the bicylic cyclophane4 of Anslyn that binds planar anions and
the calix[4]pyrrole5 of Sessler that exploits four hydrogen bond
donors to bind the spherical fluoride anion. To expand the type
of anions that can be targeted by this strategy we have prepared
a novel macrocyclic anion receptor with C3 symmetry that binds
tetrahedral anions such as sulfate and phosphate with high affinity.
Although several artificial receptors for these important2a anions
have been reported,6,7 few have the combined features of rigid,
convergent, and geometrically optimal binding groups.
Figure 1. The calculated structure of the 1:1 complex between 1 and
p-tosylate anion: (a) a side view and (b) a bottom view with CPK
representation. The lowest energy conformation of the macrocycle was
used as an initial structure for the calculation with the MM2 force field.
R groups are omitted for clarity.
Macrocycle 1 was synthesized starting from 5-substitutied-3′-
nitro-3-biphenylcarboxylic acid, which in turn was prepared from
the coupling reaction between 3-nitrophenylboronic acid and the
corresponding 3-iodobenzoic acid. Functional group manipulation
and stepwise coupling of the monomeric unit gave the linear
trimer that was cyclized to the corresponding macrocycle 1.8 This
design projects into the center of the cavity three amide groups
that serve as hydrogen bonding donors for anion binding. A Monte
Carlo conformational search9 showed that the lowest energy
conformer has a central hole ≈5 Å in diameter, lined only with
hydrogen atoms, three from the amides and six from the aryl
groups. The size of the hole and skewed arrangement of three
amide protons are nicely matched to the size and shape of
tetrahedral oxyanions, such as p-tosylate (Figure 1).
To determine the anion binding properties of the macrocycle,
NMR titration experiments10 were performed in 2% DMSO-d6/
CDCl3 and the chemical shift data were analyzed by EQNMR, a
nonlinear regression curve fitting program.11 Titration of 1 with
tosylate anion as its tetrabutylammonium salt gave 1:1 binding
isotherms for the amide and aryl protons of 1 (Figure 2). The
aryl protons of the anion showed ≈0.3 ppm upfield shifts upon
binding due presumably to the ring current effect of the macro-
cycle. The 1:1 binding ratio was confirmed by a Job’s plot.10 The
complexation induced chemical shift changes (∆δ) of the mac-
rocycle protons projecting into the central cavity (C2H, C2′H)
are much larger than those of the externally directed protons. 1a
and 1b showed similar binding affinities indicating the overall
anion binding properties are not affected significantly by the
functional groups outside the central cavity.
(1) (a) Lehn, J. M. Supramolecular Chemistry; VCH: Weinheim, 1995.
(b) Schneider, H. J.; Yatsimirski, A. Principles and Methods in Supramolecular
Chemistry; Wiley: Somerset, 2000. (c) Rojas, C. M.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5120-5121.
The other anions tested showed more complex binding
behavior, which was characterized by initial upfield shifts
(2) For recent reviews, see: (a) Supramolecular Chemistry of Anions;
Bianchi, A., Bowman-James, K., Garcia-Espana, E., Eds.; VCH: Weinheim,
1997. (b) Gale, P. A. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2000, 199, 181-233. (c) Antonisse,
M. M. G.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Chem. Commun. 1998, 443-448. (d) Schmidtch-
en, F. P.; Berger, M. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97, 1609-1646.
(3) (a) Fan, E.; Van Arman, S. A.; Kincaid, S.; Hamilton, A. D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 369-370. (b) Linton, B. R.; Goodman, M. S.; Hamilton,
A. D. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 2449-2455. (c) Kavallieratos, K.; De Gala, S.
R.; Austin, D. A.; Crabtree, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2325-2326.
(d) Davis, A. P.; Perry, J. J.; Williams, R. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
1793-1794. (e) Bu¨hlmann, P.; Nishizawa, S.; Xiao, K. P.; Umezawa, Y.
Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 1647-1654. (f) Andrievsky, A.; Ahuis, F.; Sessler, J.
L.; Vo¨gtle, F.; Gudat, D.; Moini, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9712-
9713. (g) Black, C. B.; Andrioletti, B.; Try, A. C.; Ruiperez, C.; Sessler, J. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10438-10439. (h) Sasaki, S.; Mizuno, M.;
Naemura, K.; Tobe, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 275-283.
(4) (a) Bisson, A. P.; Lynch, V. M.; Monahan, M. C.; Anslyn, E. V. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2340-2342. (b) Snowden, T. S.; Bisson, A.
P.; Anslyn, E. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 6324-6325.
(5) (a) Gale, P. A.; Sessler, J. L.; Kra´l, V.; Lynch, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 5140-5141. (b) Gale, P. A.; Sessler, J. L.; Kra´l, V. Chem. Commun.
1998, 1-8. (c) Anzenbacher, P., Jr.; Jurs´ıkova´, K.; Lynch, V. M.; Gale, P.
A.; Sessler, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11020-11021.
(6) (a) Bazzicalupi, C.; Bencini, A.; Bianchi, A.; Cecchi, M.; Escuder, B.;
Fusi, V.; Garcia-Espan˜a, E.; Giorgi, C.; Luis, S. V.; Maccagni, G.; Marcelino,
V.; Paoletti, P.; Valtancoli, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 6807-6815 and
references therein. (b) Kra´l, V.; Furuta, H.; Shreder, K.; Lynch, V.; Sessler,
J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1595-1607 and references therein.
(7) For neutral phosphate receptors with C3 symmetry, see: (a) Valiyaveet-
til, S.; Engbersen, J. F.; Verboom, W.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 900-901. (b) Beer, P. D.; Chen, Z.; Goulden, A. J.;
Graydon, A.; Stokes, S. E.; Wear, T. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993,
1834-1836. (c) Raposo, C.; Pe´rez, N.; Almaraz, M.; Mussons, L.; Caballero,
M. C.; Mora´n, J. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3255-3258. (d) Ishida, H.;
Suga, M.; Donowaki, K.; Ohkubo, K. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 5374-5375.
(e) Xie, H.; Yi, S.; Wu, S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1999, 2751-2754.
(8) The synthesis and characterization of the macrocycles are described in
the Supporting Information.
(9) (a) MacroModel9b version 6.5 was used. 2000 separate search steps
were followed by energy minimization using the MM2* force field and CHCl3
solvation parameters. (b) Mohamadi, F.; Richards, N. G.; Guida, W. C.;
Liskamp, R.; Lipton, M.; Caufield, C.; Chang, G.; Hendrickson, T.; Still, W.
C. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 440-467.
(10) Connors, K. A. Binding Constants; John Wiley: New York, 1987.
(11) Hynes, M. J. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1993, 311-312.
10.1021/ja005772+ CCC: $20.00 © 2001 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 02/20/2001