E. Korin et al. / Tetrahedron 68 (2012) 7450e7455
7455
4.2.1.3. (Z)-3-(2-Oxo-2-phenylethylidene)-6-chloro-3,4-dihydro-
quinoxalin-2-one and (Z)-3-(2-oxo-2-phenylethylidene)-7-chloro-
3,4-dihydroquinoxalin-2-one (3b). Yield: 69%; mp: 281e285 ꢃC; 1H
samples were prepared by adding 80
m
L of one of the mentioned
metal stock to 4 mL of a host stock solution. For the competition
experiment test solutions were prepared by adding 80 L of the
competing cations and 80
L of Cu2þ to 4 mL of the 2 stock solution.
m
NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6):
7.12e7.99 (m, 8H, AreH), 12.07 (s, 1H, NeH), 13.38 and 13.53 (s, 1H,
NH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d
¼6.83 and 6.85 (s, 1H, CH]C),
m
d
¼90.1, 90.5, 115.1, 116.7, 117.1,
4.4. Evaluation of the effect of EDTA/acid ratio on the
reversibility of the spectral response of 2 and its complexes
118.6, 123.7, 123.8, 123.9, 125.9, 126.1, 127.5, 127.6, 127.8, 127.9,
128.4, 129.2, 132.5, 132.6, 138.9, 145.4, 145.5, 156.1, 156.2, 188.9,
¼3436, 1690, 1620, 1540, 1462, 1400, 1368 cmꢁ1
;
Stock solutions of 2.4ꢀ10ꢁ5 M of 2 in ethanol and 1.2ꢀ10ꢁ1 M of
189.2; IR (KBr):
n
ESI-MS: m/z, 296.6 (Mþꢁ1). HRMS for C16H11ClN2O2: found
EDTA in tri-distilled water were prepared. To test the effect of EDTA
(MþH)þ¼299.05801
(calcd
299.05818);
found
on copper/nickel/zinc complexes with 2, 80 mL of EDTA was added
(MþNa)þ¼321.03964 (calcd 321.04013).
to 4 mL of 2 and 80
To test the acidity effect on these complexes 80 mL of 70% HClO4 was
m
L of one of these metallic cations (1.2ꢀ10ꢁ1 M).
4.2.1.4. (Z)-3-(2-Oxo-2-phenylethylidene)-6-(trifluoromethyl)-
3,4-dihydroquinoxalin-2-one and (Z)-3-(2-oxo-2-phenylethylidene)-
7-(trifluoromethyl)-3,4-dihydroquinoxalin-2-one (3c). Yield: 73%;
added to a solution that contain 4 mL of 2 and 80 mL of one of these
metallic cation (1.2ꢀ10ꢁ1 M) (Caution: HClO4 is a strong oxidant).
mp: 285e287 ꢃC; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d
¼6.88 and 6.90
(s, 1H, CH]C), 7.26e8.10 (m, 8H, AreH), 12.14 and 12.24 (s, 1H,
NeH), 13.39 (s, 1H, NH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6):
¼90.7,
91.2, 112.4, 116.3, 117.6, 120.7, 127.3, 127.6, 127.7, 127.9, 129.3, 132.8,
Acknowledgements
d
C.-C.Z. thanks the National Basic Research Program of China (No.
2009CB930200), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No. 7112008)
and Beijing City Education Committee (KM201010005009). The
authors are thankful to Mrs. E. Solomon for technical assistance.
J.Y.B. is grateful to Mrs. Irene Evens for supporting this research.
138.9, 145.2, 156.3, 156.6, 189.3, 189.9; IR (KBr):
n
¼3438, 1627, 1465,
1350, 1328, 1233 cmꢁ1; ESI-MS: m/z, 330.6 (Mþꢁ1). HRMS for
C17H11F3N2O2: found (MþH)þ¼333.08453 (calcd 333.08454);
found (MþNa)þ¼355.06647 (calcd 355.06648).
Supplementary data
4.2.1.5. (Z)-3-[2-Oxo-2-(4-methoxyphenylethylidene)]-3,4-dihydro-
quinoxalin-2-one (4a). Yield: 70%; mp: 238e240 ꢃC; 1H NMR
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in
These data include MOL files and InChiKeys of the most important
compounds described in this article.
(400 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d
¼3.85 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.79 (s, 1H, CH]C), 7.06
(d, 2H, J¼8.8 Hz, AreH), 7.11e7.14 (m, 3H, ArquinoxaloneeH), 7.46e7.48
(m, 1H, ArquinoxaloneeH), 7.97 (d, 2H, J¼8.8 Hz, AreH), 11.98 (s, 1H,
NeH), 13.59 (s, 1H, NH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d¼55.9, 89.4,
114.5, 115.8, 116.7, 124.1, 124.7, 127.0, 129.6, 131.8, 145.5, 156.3, 162.8,
References and notes
188.2; IR (KBr):
n
¼3437, 1626, 1416, 1368, 1260 cmꢁ1; ESI-MS: m/z,
292.6 (Mþꢁ1). HRMS (EI-TOF) for C17H14N2O3: found (M)¼294.1009
1. Hancock, R. D.; Martell, A. E. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 1875e1914.
2. Flora, S. J. S.; Pachauri, V. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7, 2745e2788.
3. Andersen, O. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2683e2710.
(calcd 294.1004).
4. Ngeontae, W.; Aeungmaitrepirom, W.; Tuntulani, T.; Imyim, A. Talanta 2009, 78,
1004e1010.
4.2.1.6. (Z)-3-[2-Oxo-2-(4-chlorophenylethylidene)]-3,4-dihydro-
quinoxalin-2-one (4b). Yield: 80%; mp: 274e276 ꢃC; 1H NMR
5. Domaille, D. W.; Que, E. L.; Chang, C. J. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2008, 4, 168e175.
6. Valeur, B.; Leray, I. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 205, 3e40.
7. Prodi, L.;Bolletta, F.;Montalti, M.; Zaccheroni, N. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 205, 59e83.
8. Keefe, M. H.; Benkstein, K. D.; Hupp, J. T. Chem. Rev. 2000, 205, 201e228.
9. Xu, Z.; Yoon, J.; Spring, D. R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 1996e2006.
10. Liu, Z. C.; Wang, B.-D.; Yang, Z.-Y.; Li, T.-R.; Li, Y. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2010, 13,
606e608.
11. Li, H.-Y.; Gao, S.; Xi, Z. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2009, 12, 300e303.
12. Wang, M. X.; Meng, X. M.; Zhu, M. Z.; Guo, Q. X. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2007, 18,
1403e1406.
(400 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d
¼6.80 (s, 1H, CH]C), 7.16 (s, 3H,
ArquinoxaloneeH), 7.55e7.71 (m, 1H, ArquinoxaloneeH), 7.58 (d, 1H,
J¼8.4 Hz, AreH), 8.01 (d, 2H, J¼8.4 Hz, AreH), 12.09 (s, 1H, NeH),
13.65 (s, 1H, NH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d
¼89.4, 115.9,
117.2, 124.2, 124.7, 127.3, 129.1, 129.3, 132.0, 137.2, 137.8, 146.4, 156.1,
167.4, 187.4; IR (KBr):
n
¼3433, 1630, 1413 cmꢁ1; ESI-MS: m/z, 297.2
(Mþꢁ1). HRMS (EI-TOF) for C16H11N2O2Cl: found (M)¼298.0513
13. Helal, A.; Rashid, M. H.; Choi, C.-H.; Kim, H.-S. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 2794e2802.
14. Zhang, J.; Yu, C.; Qian, S.; Lu, G.; Chen, J. Dyes Pigments 2012, 92, 1370e1375.
(calcd 298.0509).
ꢀ
15. Catia, I. C.; Esteves, M.; Raposo, M. M.; Susana, P. G. Tetrahedron 2010, 66,
7479e7486.
4.2.1.7. (Z)-3-[2-Oxo-2-(4-nitrophenylethylidene)]-3,4-
16. Kumar, M.; Bhalla, V.; Dhir, A.; Babu, J. N. A. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 10116e10121.
17. Dodani, S. C.; He, Q.; Chang, C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 18020e18021.
18. Abebe, F. A.; Eribal, C. S.; Ramakrishna, G.; Sinn, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52,
5554e5558.
19. Maity, D.; Govindaraju, T. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 11282e11284.
20. Budimir, A. Acta Pharm. 2011, 61, 1e14.
dihydroquinoxalin-2-one (4c). Yield: 74%; mp: 312e313 ꢃC; 1H NMR
(400 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d
¼6.86 (s, 1H, CH]C), 7.17e7.18 (m, 3H,
ArquinoxaloneeH), 7.58 (d, 1H, J¼7.6 Hz, AreH), 8.21 (d, 2H, J¼8.4 Hz,
AreH), 8.34 (d, 2H, J¼8.4 Hz, AreH), 12.16 (s, 1H, NeH), 13.81 (s, 1H,
NH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d
¼89.4, 115.9, 117.6, 124.2,
ꢁ
21. Budimir, A.; Humbert, N.; Elhabiri, M.; Osinska, I.; Birus, M.; Albrecht-Gary, A.
M. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2011, 105, 490e496.
124.4, 125.2, 127.6, 128.8, 144.2, 144.4, 147.2, 149.6, 155.8, 186.1; IR
ꢀ
ꢀ
22. Mates, J. M.; Segura, J. A.; Alonso, F. J.; Marquez, J. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2010,
(KBr):
n
¼3430, 1624, 1413 cmꢁ1; ESI-MS: m/z, 308.1 (Mþꢁ1). HRMS
49, 1328e1341.
(EI-TOF) for C16H11N3O4: found (M)¼309.0753 (calcd 309.0750).
23. Valko, M.; Rhodes, C. J.; Moncola, J.; Izakovic, M.; Mazur, M. Chem.-Biol. Interact.
2006, 160, 1e40.
24. Williams, D. R. Chem. Rev. 1972, 72, 203e213.
4.3. Preparation of sample solutions for the evaluation of the
photophysical properties of the ligands and their response to
metallic cations
25. Jomovaa, K.; Valkob, M. Toxicology 2011, 283, 65e87.
26. Desai, V.; Kaler, S. G. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 88, 855Se858S.
27. Korin, E.; Cohen, B.; Xu, Y.-S.; Zeng, C.-C.; Becker, J. Y. Tetrahedron 2011, 67,
6252e6258.
28. Iwanami, Y.; Seki, T.; Inagaki, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1971, 44, 1316e1321.
29. Rurack, K. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 2001, 57, 2161e2195.
30. Descalzo, A. B.; Zhu, S.; Fischer, T.; Rurack, K. Advanced Fluorescence Reporters In
Chemistry And Biology II: Molecular Constructions, Polymers And Nanoparticles;
Springer: New York, 2010.
Stock solutions of ligands 2, 3a, 3b, 3c, 4a, 4b, and 4c
(2.4ꢀ10ꢁ5 M) in ethanol were prepared. Their UVevis and fluo-
rescence spectra were collected. To evaluate selectivity to specific
metallic cation stock solutions of 1.2ꢀ10ꢁ1 M of Cu2þ, Zn2þ, Mg2þ
,
31. Valeur, B. Molecular Fluorescence, Principles and Applications; Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, 2001.
Co2þ, Ni2þ, Mn2þ, Ca2þ or Agþ were prepared in ethanol. Test