alcohol 7a in almost quantitative yield. The relative stereo-
chemistry of these newly generated stereocenters was
confirmed by inspection of the NMR (NOE, NOESY) spectra
of 6 and 7b. The NOE relationship between H14 and both
H19 and the neighboring allyl protons in compound 6
(Scheme 1) reflects the axial (R) orientation of the enolate
alkylation, while the significant interaction between Me18
and the OMe group in the NOESY spectrum of 7b confirmed
their cis relationship.
Table 1. RCM Studies for Formation of Eight-Membered Ring
Unfortunately, when 7a or the methyl ether 7b were
submitted to RCM conditions using Grubbs’ catalyst (8a),
they were recovered unaltered; while treatment with the more
reactive ruthenium catalyst 8b14 furnished compounds 9a and
9b in very high yield, i.e., formation of the six-membered
ring prevailed over formation of the eight-membered ring,
even though it involved reaction with the more substituted
olefin. This result was not completely unexpected, because
the formation of eight-membered rings is especially difficult.
In particular, it has become increasingly apparent that the
formation of cyclooctene by metathesis requires a confor-
mationally predisposed diene or an adequately oriented polar
functional group acting as an internal ligand.10c,15 Further-
more, our cyclization precursor is a 1,2-cis disubstituted
cyclohexane, and previous studies have shown that substrates
of this kind undergo RCM to [6.4.0] systems less easily than
the corresponding trans systems.16 In our case, and to further
check if cyclooctene formation by RCM was indeed a viable
alternative for our synthetic purposes, we prepared com-
pounds 10a-f (Table 1), for which the otherwise preferred
cyclohexene pathway is not possible because they have no
internal double bond. Additional issues of interest were to
unveil how substitutents on the olefin and the presence of a
cyclohexyl precursor of ring A of I would affect the course
of the RCM reaction.
entry substrate
P
R2 R3
m
n
catalyst yield %a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
10a
10b
10c
10d
10d
10e
10f
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
8a
86
8a /8b
8a /8b
8a
ndb
ndb
ndb
92
Me
Me Me
Me Me
H
Me
8b
Me
8b
8b
89
ndb
(CH2)4
a Isolated yields of 11. b nd ) not detected in reaction crude by 1H NMR
(a variety of solvents were used).
membered ring by RCM is possible, but they also suggest
that the constrains introduced by the cyclohexane ring do
not allow adoption of the conformation necessary for the
annulation.
In view of the above results we planned a new approach
in which initial formation of the ring B by RCM was to be
followed by a second cyclization to generate ring A (Figure
3). Specifically, we hoped for tandem RCM of dienyne 12a.17
The results of this study are listed in Table 1. Substrates
10a, 10d, and 10e afforded the desired eight-membered ring
(entries 1, 5, and 6). Entries 2 and 3 show that a methylene
group (n ) 1) between the olefin and the bicyclic system is
required: substrates 10b and 10c failed to cyclize regardless
of changes of solvent and catalyst and protection of the
hydroxyl group. For the gem-disubstituted terminal olefins
10d and 10e, catalyst 8b was required for RCM (entries
4-6). The attempted ring closure of the cyclohexyl derivative
10f [R2-R3) (CH2)4, entry 7] failed completely, lengthy
reaction in refluxing benzene bringing about metathetic
dimerization. These results show that formation of the eight-
Figure 3. The proposed tandem metathesis approach.
Although there was no precedent for the formation of a
[6.4.0] bicycle by RCM of dienynes,18 the observed readiness
of 10a, 10d, and 10e to form the eight-membered ring led
us to expect that intramolecular enyne metathesis of carbene
12b would give the first ring plus the regenerated carbene
(13) Bromide 5 was prepared in 81% yield by treatment of alcohol 4
with triphenylphosphine and carbon tetrabromide in dichloromethane.
(14) Scholl, M.; Ding, S.; Lee, C. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett. 1999, 1,
953-956.
(15) (a) Fu¨rstner, A.; Langemann, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
9130-9136. (b) Crimmins, M. T.; Choy, A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 5653-5660. (c) Paquette, L. A.; Tae, J.; Arrington, M. P.; Sadoun, A.
H. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2000, 122, 2742-2748.
(16) (a) Miller, S. J.; Kim, S.-H.; Chen, Z.-R.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 2108-2109. (b) For an example of tricyclic system
formation using a cis-diene, see: Holt, D. J.; Barker, W. D.; Jenkins, P.
R.; Davies, D. L.; Garrat, S.; Fawcet, J.; Russell, D. R.; Ghosh, S. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 3298-3300. (c) 1, 2-cis disubstituted cyclopentane
derivatives were also worse substrates than the trans dienes: Paquete, L.
A.; Mendez-Andino, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4301-4304. (d) Fu¨rstner,
A.; Langemann, K. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 8746-9749.
(17) (a) Kim, S.-H.; Bowden, N.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 10801-10802. (b) Kim, S.-H.; Zuercher, W. J.; Bowden, N. B.;
Grubbs, R. H. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 1073-1081. (c) Zuercher, W. J.;
Scholl, M.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 4291-4298. (d) Fu¨rstner,
A.; Liebl, M.; Hill, A. F.; Wilton-Ely, J. D. E. T. Chem. Commun. 1999,
601-602.
(18) For recent eight-membered heterocycle ring formation using enyne
metathesis, see: Mori, M.; Kitamura, T.; Sakakibara, N.; Sato, Y. Org.
Lett. 2000, 2, 543-545.
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 10, 2001
1485