Scheme 1 Proposed reaction mechanism.
RDS, and the structure of the hydroboration intermediate
clearly indicated that HB transfer occurs before the HN
transfer. Thus, this double-H transfer can be defined as
stepwise and in a polar terminology with hydride before
proton transfer.
Fig. 2 Selected 13C NMR spectra (range of 24 to 45 ppm) in
THF-D8: (a) pure 1a, labeled with circles K; (b) pure 2a, labeled with
triangles .; (c) in situ spectrum for the reaction of 1a with AB
(2 to 1 molar ratio) at ꢀ40 1C: five new resonances from 3a appeared
(labeled with squares ’)—including a broad signal; (d) in situ spectrum
for the reaction of 1a with AB(D) at ꢀ40 1C: two triplets belonging to CD
(1JDC = 20 Hz) appeared as labeled with arrows k, and the broad
resonance became sharper; (e) in situ spectrum for the reaction of 1a with
A(D)B at ꢀ40 1C: only one triplet of 2a appeared.
We gratefully thank the Swiss National Science Foundation
and the University of Zurich for financial support.
Notes and references
1 D. Klomp, U. Hanefeld and J. A. Peeters, in Handbook of
Homogeneous Hydrogenation, ed. J. G. De Vries and
C. J. Elsevier, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2007; S. Gladiali
and E. Alberico, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2006, 35, 226–236;
J. S. M. Samec, J.-E. Bakvall, P. G. Andersson and P. Brandt,
¨
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2006, 35, 237–248.
started to grow in. The same experiment was also carried out
in acetonitrile leading to similar observations but at lower rate.
From the related reactions of 1a with AB(D) and A(D)B at
ꢀ40 1C, 1H, 13C and 11B NMR spectra were taken. Comparing
the 13C NMR spectra with that of the reaction of 1a with AB,
it can clearly be seen that the HB (or DB) atom was in the
intermediate already transferred, while the HN (or DN) atom
was not, since a triplet due to C–D coupling (1JDC = 20 Hz)
was exclusively observed for the intermediate only when
AB(D) was used (Fig. 2, spectrum d).
2 H. Berke, ChemPhysChem, 2010, 11, 1837–1849; A. Comas-Vives,
G. Ujaque and A. Lledos, THEOCHEM, 2009, 903, 123–132.
´
3 H. Meerwein and R. Schmidt, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem., 1925, 444,
221–228; W. Ponndorf, Angew. Chem., 1926, 39, 138–143; Verley,
Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., 1925, 37, 871–874.
4 R. Noyori, T. Okhuma, M. Kitamura, H. Takaya, N. Sayo,
H. Kumobayashi and S. Akuragawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987,
109, 5856–5858; R. Noyori, in Asymmetric Catalysis In Organic
Synthesis, Wiley-Interscience, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1994,
pp. 16–94; Y. Blum, D. Czarkie, Y. Rahamim and Y. Shvo,
Organometallics, 1985, 4, 1459–1461; Y. Shvo, D. Czarkie,
Y. Rahamim and D. F. Chodosh, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1986, 108,
7400–7402 and references cited therein.
Based on all these mechanistic facts, a two-step hydrogen
transfer mechanism is proposed with fast initial hydroboration
forming intermediate 3 (Scheme 1).9 There are two possible
routes to 3, the ionic pathway A and the concerted pathway B.
Considering the solvent effect and comparing THF with
acetonitrile, the ionic pathway A is expected to work better in
the more polar solvent acetonitrile, while the concerted route B
seems to be in operation in the less polar solvent THF. Since the
reaction proceeds much faster in THF than in acetonitrile,
route B seems more reasonable. The RDS is the transfer
of the HN atom of AB, which could be transferred via an
intra-molecular mode as shown in 4 of Scheme 1, followed by
the elimination of the very reactive [BH2NH2], which will be
rapidly further dehydrogenated to BZ presumably in a similar
manner as the reaction of 1 with AB.
5 A review on uncatalyzed transfer hydrogenation reactions:
C. Ruchardt, M. Gerst and J. Ebenhoch, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
¨
Engl., 1997, 36, 1406–1430.
6 X. Yang, L. Zhao, T. Fox, Z.-X. Wang and H. Berke, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 2058–2062.
7 For reactions on amine-borane adducts see: A. Staubitz,
A. P. M. Robertson and I. Manners, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110,
4079–4124; A. Staubitz, A. P. M. Robertson, M. E. Sloan and
I. Manners, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 4023–4078 and references cited
therein.
8 J. H. Espenson, in Chemical kinetics and reaction mechanisms,
McGRAW-HILL, Inc., 2nd edn, 1995, pp. 214–228;
H. H. Limbach, in Hydrogen Transfer Reactions, ed. J. T. Hynes,
J. Klinman, H. H. Limbach and R. L. Schowen, Wiley-VCH,
Weinheim, Germany, 2007, vols. 1 & 2, ch. 6 and references cited
therein.
9 For mechanistic studies on dehydrocoupling of AB also see:
P. M. Zimmerman, A. Paul, Z. Zhang and C. B. Musgrave, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 2201–2205; W. J. Shaw, J. C. Linehan,
N. K. Szymczak, D. J. Heldebrant, C. Yonker, D. M. Camaioni,
R. T. Baker and T. Autrey, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47,
7493–7496; X. Yang and M. B. Hall, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130,
1798–1799; V. Pons, R. T. Baker, N. K. Szymczak,
D. J. Heldebrant, J. C. Linehan, M. H. Matus, D. J. Grant and
D. A. Dixon, Chem. Commun., 2008, 6597–6599 and references cited
therein.
In summary, we have demonstrated a very efficient metal
free transfer hydrogenation of polarized olefins substituted
with EWD groups on one side of the double bond with AB at
room temperature. Deuterium labelling studies confirmed
the regiospecificity in the H transfer processes. The DKIE
demonstrated that only the HN transfers get involved in the
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 2053–2055 2055