8594 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 123, No. 35, 2001
Communications to the Editor
Scheme 3a
a (i) CrCl2, NiCl2 (cat.), DMF, rt, 79%, dr ) 1:1; (ii) PPTS, MeOH, 35 °C, then NaOH, rt, 86%; (iii) 2,4,6-Cl3C6H2COCl, Et3N, THF, rt, then DMAP,
PhMe, ∆, 75%; (iv) TESOTf, 2,6-lutidine, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 95%; (v) O3, CH2Cl2-MeOH (3:1), -78 °C, then Ph3P, -78 °C f rt, 81%; (vi) CHI3, CrCl2,
THF, 0 °C f rt, 76%; (vii) PPTS, MeOH-CH2Cl2 (4:1), rt, 88%; (viii) Dess-Martin periodinane, pyr-CH2Cl2, 0 °C, then HF‚pyr, THF, rt, 88%; (ix)
29, NBS, MeCN, -35 °C f rt, 27%; (x) DDQ, CH2Cl2-H2O (20:1), rt, 70%; (xi) 32, PdCl2(MeCN)2, DMF, rt, 74%.
allylation using (-)-diisopinylcampheylmethoxyborane (Scheme
2),7 and the resulting (S) homoallylic alcohol8 was protected as
its tert-butyldimethylsilyl ether before ozonolysis of the terminal
alkene furnished aldehyde 10. Condensation of 10 with the di-
n-butylboron enolate of (R)-4-benzyl-3-propionyloxazolidin-2-one
(11)9 afforded aldol product 12, a substance that could not be
purified without causing retroaldol fragmentation. Oxazolidinone
12 was therefore transformed directly to its easily purified
Weinreb amide by reaction with trimethylaluminum and N-
methoxymethylamine hydrochloride.10 After protection of the
secondary alcohol of this amide as its triisopropylsilyl ether,
reduction with DIBAL-H yielded aldehyde 13. Condensation of
13 with the Gennari-Still phosphonate 1411 gave the expected
Figure 1. Energy-minimized conformation (Spartan, PM3) of the
prelactonization complex from 22 and DMAP. The model is constrained
cis R,â-unsaturated ester 15, and subsequent removal of both tert-
to mimic a Burgi-Dunitz approach trajectory of the C15 hydroxyl at the
butyldimethylsilyl ethers under acidic conditions produced a diol
which underwent clean cyclization in the presence of methanolic
potassium carbonate to produce tetrahydropyran 16. Oxidation
of primary alcohol 16 to an aldehyde, followed by exposure to
Ohira’s reagent (17),12 furnished alkyne 18 which was reacted
with 9-bromo-9-borabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane (19)13 to give vinyl
bromide 20.
Coupling of aldehyde 8 with bromide 20 was carried out under
Nozaki-Hiyama-Kishi conditions14 and gave allylic alcohol 21
as a 1:1 mixture of epimers (Scheme 3). These were separated
by column chromatography, and the less polar (10S) alcohol was
treated with acidic methanol and then saponified to yield
trihydroxy carboxylic acid 22. Macrolactonization of 22 under
Yamaguchi conditions15 afforded exclusively 23 resulting from
closure at the C15 hydroxyl group, with no trace of lactones
activated acyl group.
derived from the hydroxyl substituents at either C10 or C13. The
structure of 23 was fully confirmed by X-ray crystallographic
analysis. A molecular modeling study of the cationic acyl DMAP
adduct derived from acid 22, a putative intermediate in the
lactonization, revealed that the reactive conformer leading to 23
is >8.5 kcal mol-1 lower in energy than alternative assemblies
leading to possible nine- and twelve-membered lactones (Figure
1). Although analogous theoretical treatment of the epimeric (10R)
acyl DMAP complex indicated a difference in energy between
competing lactonization pathways, the (10R) epimer corresponding
to trihydroxy acid 22 yielded only 46% of the 14-membered
lactone together with 16% of the 12-membered macrocycle
derived from lactonization at the C13 hydroxyl group.
Dihydroxy lactone 23 was protected as its bis-triethylsilyl ether
24 before ozonolysis to furnish keto aldehyde 25. A Takai
reaction16 of 25 with iodoform gave iodoalkene 26 in which the
C10 alcohol was unmasked selectively with acidic methanol.
Oxidation of R-hydroxy ketone 27 to a diketone, followed by
exposure to hydrogen fluoride, resulted in removal of both silyl
groups with concomitant cyclization to hemiketal 28. The latter
was identical in all respects to the substance prepared indepen-
dently by Murai3a and Paquette3b in the course of their syntheses
of 1.17 The C10 epimer of 23 was successfully elaborated to 28
(7) Racherla, U. S.; Brown, H. C. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 401.
(8) Paterson, I; Wallace, D. J.; Gibson, K. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38,
8911.
(9) Gage, J. R.; Evans, D. A. Organic Syntheses; John Wiley & Sons: New
York, 1993; Collect. Vol. 8, p 339.
(10) (a) Levin, J. I.; Turos, E.; Weinreb, S. M. Synth. Commun. 1982, 12,
989. (b) Evans, D. A.; Bender, S. L.; Morris, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110,
2506.
(11) Still, W. C.; Gennari, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 4405.
(12) (a) Ohira, S. Synth. Commun. 1989, 19, 561. (b) Mu¨ller, S.; Liepold,
B.; Roth, G. J.; Bestmann, H. J. Synlett 1996, 521.
(13) Hara, S.; Dojo, H.; Takinami, S.; Suzuki, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983,
24, 731.
(14) (a) Jin, H.; Uenishi, J.; Christ, W. J.; Kishi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1986, 108, 5644. (b) Takai, K.; Tagashira, M.; Kuroda, T.; Oshima, K.;
Uchimoto, K.; Nozaki, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 6048.
(15) Inanaga, J.; Hirata, K.; Saeki, H.; Katsuki, T.; Yamaguchi, M. Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1979, 52, 1989.
(16) Takai, K.; Nitta, K.; Utimoto, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 7408.
(17) Data for 28: [R]22 -35.6 (c 0.09, CHCl3); lit.3a [R]22 -38 (c 0.12,
D
D
CHCl3).