Communication
works, we report a facile approach for the synthesis of benzo[b]
azepine derivatives from butenyl anilines through I2-promoted
intramolecular cross-coupling of two C(sp2)À H bonds.
entry 19). So the optimized reaction conditions were estab-
lished as Table 1, entry 14.
Based on the optimal reaction conditions, we investigated
the substituent scope of this protocol by the synthesis of a
variety of benzo[b]azepines. As shown in Scheme 2, substrates
1 with electron-donating or electron-withdrawing groups on
aniline moiety performed smoothly and gave the desired
products in moderate yields. These results illustrate that the
electronic effect of substituents on the aniline moiety have a
slight influence on the reaction. For example, substrate 1h
bearing strong electron-withdrawing group CF3 gave the
product 2h in 46% yield. Furthermore, substrates 1i–1q derived
from meta- and ortho-substituted anilines produced the corre-
sponding products 2i–2q in 52–62% yields, indicating that the
steric effect was negligible. Notably, disubstituted substrates
1r–1s were also tolerated to afford 2r–2s in moderate yields.
Encouraged by the above results, we next investigated the
scope of R2 moieties of substrates 1, and the results are shown
in Scheme 3. Under the optimized reaction conditions, sub-
strates 1t–1z with different groups on the para-position of the
benzene ring of R2 moieties were compatible with this trans-
formation and generated the desired products 2t–2z in
moderate yields. Among them, the yields of R2 moieties with
electron-withdrawing groups were slightly higher than those
with electron-donating groups. Moreover, the substrates 1aa–
1af with groups on both aniline moieties and R2 moieties were
also suitable for this transformation, generating desired prod-
ucts in 49–75% yields. Unfortunately, this method was not
compatible with naphthyl substrate 1ag and only a trace
amount of 2ag was detected.
Initially, we attempted to optimize the reaction conditions
for this I2-promoted intramolecular cross-coupling/cyclization of
N-(3-phenylbut-3-en-1-yl)aniline 1a. As shown in Table 1, the
reaction was conducted in the presence of I2 (1.0 equiv) in DCE
°
at 100 C for 12 h under argon atmosphere. Pleasingly, the
reaction proceeded smoothly to afford the desired product 2a
in 35% yield (Table 1, entry 1). The structure of 2a was
determined by X-ray diffraction analysis (see the Supporting
Information for details). Next, the product 2a was obtained in
30–48% in THF, HFIP, and CH3CN, but no product was formed in
DMF (Table 1, entries 2–5). Furthermore, some mixture solvents
were screened, and the yield was increased to 60% using the
mixture of HFIP/tBuOH (2:1) as the solvent (Table 1, entries 6–
9). Either decreasing or increasing the temperature failed to
improve the yield of 2a (Table 1, entries 10–11). The reaction
was unable to occur in the absence of I2 (Table 1, entry 12),
indicating that molecular iodine was essential for this reaction.
Subsequently, we investigated the effect of the amount of
iodine and found that when the dosage of I2 was increased to
2.0 equiv, the yield of product 2a was increased to 71%
(Table 1, entries 13–14). However, further increase in the
amount of I2 did not lead to significant difference in the yield
(Table 1, entry 15). A series of acids were screened as additives,
but none of them gave a better result (Table 1, entries 16–18).
Finally, the reaction was also carried out with 2.0 equiv. of I2 in
HFIP, and the product 2a was isolated in 53% yield (Table 1,
Table 1. Optimization of the reaction conditions.[a]
°
Entry
I2 [eq.]
Additive
Solvent
Temp. [ C]
Yield[b] [%]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
–
1.5
2.0
2.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
DCE
THF
DMF
HFIP
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
80
120
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
35
30
0
48
32
47
44
55
60
54
40
0
66
71
69
43
63
61
53
CH3CN
HFIP/DCE (1:1)
HFIP/THF (1:1)
HFIP/tBuOH (1:1)
HFIP/tBuOH (2:1)
HFIP/tBuOH (2:1)
HFIP/tBuOH (2:1)
HFIP/tBuOH (2:1)
HFIP/tBuOH (2:1)
HFIP/tBuOH (2:1)
HFIP/tBuOH (2:1)
HFIP/tBuOH (2:1)
HFIP/tBuOH (2:1)
HFIP/tBuOH (2:1)
HFIP
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
–
–
–
CF3COOH
BF3 ·OEt2
FeCl3
–
[a] Reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), I2, and solvent (3 mL) for 12 h under argon. [b] Isolated yield. Entry in bold highlights optimized reaction conditions,
and the reaction time was monitored by TLC.
Chem Asian J. 2021, 16, 1–5
2
© 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH
��
These are not the final page numbers!