Chemistry Letters 2001
899
4). Thus, 3 (R = TBS) was converted to the bromide 16, which
11
was treated with Ni(cod)2 to yield a mixture in moderate
yield, whose NMR spectra obviously showed that the mixture
consisted of 17 and 18 (ca. 1:1). But separation of these iso-
mers was totally unsuccessful. The difficulty in separation was
not improved by deprotecting to the alcohol mixture (1 and 19).
1
The detailed comparison of the H and 13C NMR spectra12 of
to those of natural 1 (Table 1) revealed that only 11 has the
chemical shifts consistent with those of natural product [∆δ <
0.04 ppm (1H); ∆δ < 0.2 ppm (13C)] suggesting that the isomer
11 was the desired compound, although the stereochemistry has
not been established yet. Five of eight possible diastereomers
were formed and the isopropenyl group and the hydroxy group
in the products tend to have cis disposition. But clear explana-
tion of the stereoselectivity of the ene reaction was difficult. To
utilize the diastereomer formed in the hydroboration of 4, 5a
was transformed into the thioether 6b in 96% overall yield
(Scheme 3).
the obtained mixture with those of natural testudinariol A clear-
ly revealed the presence of testudinariol A (1) in the mixture.
We are very grateful to Professor K. Mori, Science
University of Tokyo, for the identification of the key compound
and useful discussion. This work was partially supported by a
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 11672132) from the
Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan.
References and Notes
1
A. Spinera, E. Mollo, E. Trivellone, and G. Cimino, Tetrahedron,
53, 16891 (1997).
For a recent review of marine polyether triterpenes, see J. J.
Fernándes, M. L. Souto, and M. Norte, Nat. Prod. Rep., 17, 235
(2000).
For our previous synthesis using baker’s yeast reduction, see H.
Hioki, H. Ooi, M. Hamano, Y. Mimura, S. Yoshio, M. Kodama, S.
Ohta, M. Yanai, and S. Ikegami, Tetrahedron, 57, 1235 (2001) and
references cited therein.
2
3
4
5
H. Takikawa, M. Yoshida, and K. Mori, Tetrahedron Lett., 42, 1527
(2001).
The results were presented previously. M. Kodama, H. Hioki, S.
Yoshio, M. Matsushita, M. Hamano, C. Kanehara, Y. Ohnishi, Y.
Umemori, M. Kubo, and H. Sakai, 42nd Symposium on the
Chemistry of Natural Products, Okinawa, November, 2000, Abstr.,
No. 40.
6
H. Hioki, H. Ooi, Y. Mimura, S. Yoshio, and M. Kodama, Synlett,
1998, 729.
It was necessary to improve the yield of 11 in the ene reac-
tion of 5b. In preliminary experiments using model compounds,
we found that scandium triflate,10 Sc(OTf)3, is a better catalyst
of the present ene reaction and we obtained the desired 11 in
49% yield together with 37% of the isomer mixture using 0.1
mol equivalent of Sc(OTf)3. Thus, the obtained 11 was con-
verted to the key synthetic intermediate 3 (R = TBS) by simple
modification of the protective groups (Scheme 4).
7
8
9
I. Nagawa and T. Hata, Tetrahedron Lett., 1975, 1409.
B. M. Trost and D. P. Curran, Tetrahedron Lett., 22, 1287 (1981).
For reviews, see: B. B. Snider, in “Comprehensive Organic
Synthesis,” ed. by B. M. Trost and I. Fleming, Pergamon, Oxford
(1991), Vol. 2, pp 527–567 and Vol. 5, pp 1–27.
10 V. K. Aggarwal, G. P. Vennall, P. N. Davey, and C. Newman,
Tetrahedron Lett., 39, 1409 (1998).
11 P. J. M. Reijnders, H. R. Fransen, and H. M. Buck, Recl. Trav.
Chim. Pays-Bas., 98, 511 (1979).
12 Selected NMR chemical shifts of 1; H NMR δ (CDCl3) 1.84 (6H,
1
Although successful synthesis of 3 (R = TBS) constitutes
the formal synthesis of testudinariol A (1) because the alcohol
thus obtained was identical to the compound prepared by Mori
et al.,3 we independently attempted the synthesis of 1 (Scheme
s), 2.40 (2H, ddd, J = 5.8, 5.8, 11.6 Hz), 3.19 (2H, dd, J = 8.7, 8.7
Hz), 3.73 (2H, d, J = 12.9 Hz), 4.18 (2H, m), 4.59 (2H, d, J = 12.9
Hz), 4.82 (2H, s), 4.97 (2H, s), 5.17 (2H, t-like, J = 6.3 Hz); 13C
NMR δ (CDCl3) 23.3, 26.7, 27.2, 27.3, 32.0, 33.0, 52.0, 53.1, 66.7,
74.8, 80.7, 112.2, 123.4, 134.3, 144.4.