328
B. Dymock et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 325–328
References and notes
1.Pearl, L.H;.Prodromou, C.
10, 46.
Curr. Opin. Struc. Biol. 2000,
2. Young, J. C.; Moarefi, I.; Hartl, F. U. J. Cell. Biol. 2001,
154, 267.
3. Roe, S. M.; Prodromou, C.; O’Brien, R.; Ladbury, J. E.;
Piper, P.W;. Pearl, L.H. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 260.
4. Chiosis, C.; Huezo, H.; Rosen, N.; Mimnaugh, E.;
Whitesell, L.; Neckers, L. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2003, 2,
123.
5. Egorin, M. J.; Zuhowski, E. G.; Rosen, D. M.; Sentz,
D. L.; Covey, J. M.; Eiseman, J. L. Cancer Chemother.
Pharmacol. 2001, 47, 291.
6. Egorin, M.; Lagattuta, T.; Hamburger, D.; Covey, J.;
White, K.; Musser, S.; Eiseman, J. Cancer Chemother.
Pharmacol. 2002, 49, 7.
7. Soga, S.; Sharma, S.; Shiotsu, Y. S.; Makiko, T.;
Harunobu, Y.; Kazuo, I.; Yoji, M.; Chikara, T.;
Tatsuya, K.; Junichi, S.; Theodor, W.; Neckers, L. M.;
Akinaga, S. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2001, 48,
435.
Figure 5. Western blots analysis showing an increase in Hsp70 and a
decrease in c-Raf following exposure of HCT116 cells to 1- and 2-fold
GI50 concentrations of compounds 8, 10, 11 and 17AAG (control).
8. Banerji, U. O. D. A.; Scurr, M.; Benson, C.; Hanwell, J.;
Clark, S.; Raynaud, F.; Turner, A.; Walton, M.; Work-
man, P.; Judson, I. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2001, 20,
82a.
9. Munster, P. T. L.; Schwartz, L.; Larson, S.; Kenneson,
K.; De La Cruz, A.; Rosen, N.; Scher, H. Proc. Am. Soc.
Clin. Oncol. 2001, 20, 83a.
10. Wilson, R. H.; Takimoto, C. H.; Adnew, E. B.; Morrison,
G.; Grollman, F.; Thomas, R. R.; Saif, M. W.; Hopkins,
J.; Allegra, C.; Grochow, L.; Szabo, E.; Hamilton, J. M.;
4. Biology
The cellular activity of three of the most active ATPase
inhibitors was measured using a Sulforhodamine B (SRB)
growth inhibition assay on the human colon tumour cell
line, HCT116.All three compounds ( 8, 10, 11) exhibited
similar GI50 values (3.9, 3.4 and 3.3 mM, respectively).
This compares well with the GI50 described by Chiosis et
al.for 8 in MCF-7 cells.14 In order to distinguish between
generalised and HSP90 inhibitor-specific cell growth
inhibition, the upregulation of the co-chaperone HSP70
and down-regulation of the HSP90 client protein Raf-1
was measured at the cell growth inhibition GI50 value.It
has been shown previously that this change in protein
expression profile is due to specific HSP90 inhibi-
tion.18,19 When exposed to these compounds the
HCT116 cells demonstrated an increase in the levels of
HSP70 and decrease in the levels of Raf-1 (Fig.5 ).11
This indicates that cell growth inhibition is occurring by
a mechanism dependent on HSP90 inhibition.
Monahan, B.P;. Neckers, L.G;. Rem, J.L.
Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2001, 20, 82a.
Proc. Am.
11. Jez, J.; Chen, J.-H.; Rastelli, G.; Stroud, R.; Santi, D.
Chem. Biol. 2003, 10, 361.
12. Chiosis, G.; Timaul, M. N.; Lucas, B.; Munster, P. N.;
Zheng, F. F.; Sepp-Lorenzino, L.; Rosen, N. Chem. Biol.
2001, 8, 289.
13.Chiosis, G.and Rosen, N.PCT WO 02/36075, 2002;
Chem. Abstr. 2002, 136, 374828.
14. Chiosis, G.; Lucas, B.; Shtil, A.; Huezo, H.; Rosen, N.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2002, 10, 3555.
15. Kasibhatla, S. R.; Hong, K.; Zhang, L.; Biamonte, M. A.;
Boehm, M. F.; Shi, J.; Fan, J. PCT WO 03/037860, 2003,
Chem. Abstr. 2003, 356414.
16. Lucas, B.; Rosen, N.; Chiosis, G. J. Comb. Chem. 2001, 3,
518.
17.Data for 12: Purified by flash chromatography eluting
with CH2Cl2–2%MeOH/CH2Cl2. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 7.26)
d 0.98 (t, 3H, J=7.5 Hz), 1.39 (m, 2H), 1.68 (m, 2H), 4.05
(t, 2H, J=7.5 Hz), 4.23 (s, 2H), 5.99 (s, 2H), 6.04 (s, 2H),
6.76 (dd, 1H, J=1.5, 8.0 Hz), 6.80 (d, 1H, J=1.5 Hz),
6.86 (d, 1H, J=8.0 Hz). LC–MS retention time=2.31
min, m/z (EI): 344 (M++1).Anal.calcd for
C17H18FN5O2: C, 59.41; H, 5.24; N, 20.39. Found: C,
59.57; H, 5.34; N, 20.01.
5. Conclusion
Structure–activity relationships for a series of purine
inhibitors of the Hsp90 chaperone have been explained
by multiple X-ray structures of the ligands bound to the
target.Elucidation of the key hydrogen bonds and
hydrophobic interactions should enable more potent
inhibitors to be developed.
18. Aherne, G.; Maloney, A.; Prodromou, C.; Rowlands, M.;
Hardcastle, A.; Boxall, K.; Clarke, P.; Walton, M.; Pearl,
L.; Workman, P. Assays for HSP90 and Inhibitors. In
Methods in Molecular Medicine: Novel Anticancer Drug
Protocols; Adjei, A., Buolamwini, J., Eds.; Humana: NJ,
2003; p 149.
Acknowledgements
The authors are indebted to Joanne Wayne and Kate
Grant for enzyme assays and Adam Hold and Heather
Simmonite for analytical support.
19.Workman, P. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2003, 2, 131.