2708
S. Adelt et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 11 (2001) 2705–2708
Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 (35%). We also observed rapid phos-
phorylation of Ins(1,2,4)P3 (8a), but with a remarkable
difference in regiospecificity [7% Ins(1,2,4,6)P4 and 93%
Ins(1,2,4,5)P4; see Figure 2C]. Consistent with the
experiment presented above, Ins(2,3,6)P3 (8b) is not a
substrate. Inspection of the molecular models and first
calculations confirm a structural relationship between
Ins(1,3,4)P3 and Ins(1,2,4)P3 (8a). According to mole-
cular modeling analysis the axial phosphate group in 2-
position of Ins(1,2,4)P3 (8a) can be nearly superimposed
on the equatorially orientated 3-phosphate group of
Ins(1,3,4)P3 by rotating the corresponding phosphate
groups around the C–O bonds. The structural resem-
blance may explain why both compounds are converted
with nearly equal rates [specific activities at substrate
saturation: 36.9 mU/mg for Ins(1,3,4)P3 and 39.8 mU/
mg for Ins(1,2,4)P3 (8a)]. Further progress in under-
standing substrate recognition and varying specificities
of the kinase for different substrates will be best addres-
sed by determination of the structure of the active site.
5. Yang, X.; Shears, S. B. Biochem. J. 2000, 351, 551.
6. Schultz, C.; Roemer, S.; Stadler, C.; Rudolf, M. T.; Wolf-
son, E.; Traynor-Kaplan, A. E.. Gastroenterology 1997, 112,
A401.
7. Adelt, S.; Plettenburg, O.; Stricker, R.; Reiser, G.; Alten-
bach, H.-J.; Vogel, G. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 1262.
8. 1H NMR data for compound 5 [D2O, 400 MHz, pH adjus-
ted to 6.0 (ND4OD)]: d ppm 3.56 (dd, J=2, 10.2 Hz, H-C3);
3.78 (ꢀt, Jꢁ9.6 Hz, H-C6); 3.86 (ꢀq, Jꢁ8.7 Hz, H-C5); 3.92
(dꢀt, J=2, 7.4 Hz, H-C1); 4.15 (ꢀq, Jꢁ9.2 Hz, H-C4); 4.68
(H-C2, partially under HDO-signal); 13C NMR (101 MHz): d
ppm 70.61 (s, C3); 71.77 (dd, C6); 74.39 (dd, C1); 74.86 (d,
20
C4); 77.01 (dd, C2); 78.04 (m, C5); ½ꢀꢂD ꢃ26.3 ꢄ (c=0.7, H2O,
free acid). This agrees with published data: Mills, St. J.; Potter,
B. V. L. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1997, 1279.
9. Plettenburg, O.; Adelt, S.; Vogel, G.; Altenbach, H.-J. Tet-
rahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 1057.
10. Watts, D. J.; Ashworth, J. M. Biochem. J. 1970, 119, 171.
11. The cytosolic 5-phosphatase was enriched by chromato-
graphy on heparin agarose (type II, Sigma) and DEAE-
Sepharose ff (Amersham-Pharmacia). The fraction with high-
est activity was concentrated by ultrafiltration (Centriprep-10,
Millipore).
12. Membrane-associated phytase was solubilized with 1%
hydrogenated Triton X-100 (Calbiochem). The enzyme was
partially purified by sequential biochromatography (Q-
Sepharose ff and Source 15Q, both from Amersham-Pharma-
cia).
Concluding Remarks
In vitro Ins(1,2,4)P3 (8a) delays the off-switch reaction
of the signaling molecule Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 catalyzed by
Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 1-kinase/Ins(1,3,4)P3 5/6-kinase. Unex-
pectedly, the non-physiological trisphosphate 8a func-
tions as a substrate and not as an inhibitor of the
enzyme. Phosphorylation of 8a leads predominantly to
Ins(1,2,4,5)P4, a compound with potential to act as an
Ins(1,4,5)P3-receptor agonist.16 In vivo Ins(1,2,4,5)P4 is
most likely dephosphorylated by a member of the 5-
phosphatase family, thereby regenerating Ins(1,2,4)P3.
The synthesis of a cell-permeant, bioactivatable analo-
gue of Ins(1,2,4)P3 (8a) for studies with intact cells could
be a promising new starting point for the development
of drugs that might intervene in the signal transduction
pathways with therapeutic benefit.4
13. The conversion of Ins(1,2,4,5)P4 (5) catalyzed by the 5-
phosphatase was carried out at room temperature in a volume
of 12 mL [40 mM Bis-Tris (pH 7.0), 200 mM sucrose, 5 mM
MgCl2, 0.25 mM EDTA] on a reciprocal shaker (60 rpm). At
an initial substrate concentration of 400 mM 5 and a volume
activity of about 10 mU/mL (total activity obtained from 1010
cells), it took approximately 0.5 h for a complete conversion.
New substrate was added four times from a 30 mM stock
solution. After additional 1.5 h of incubation the reaction was
stopped with 2 mL 2.5 M HCl. The pH of the mixture was
adjusted to 7, and the denaturated protein was removed by
centrifugation (6000g, 15 min, rt). Overall yield after purifica-
tion by HPLC was 95%, equivalent to 22.8 mmol 8a. For
details about reaction control, purification by HPLC and
quantification of inositol phosphates see ref 7.
14. 1H NMR data for compound 8a (D2O, 400 MHz, pH
adjusted to 6.0 (ND4OD)): d ppm: 3.5 (ꢀt, Jꢁ9.2 Hz, H-C5);
3.65 (dd, J=1.5, 9.5 Hz, H-C3); 3.84 (ꢀt, Jꢁ9.6 Hz, H-C6);
4.0 (dꢀt, J=1.8, 9.7 Hz, H-C1); 4.18 (ꢀq, Jꢁ9.3 Hz, H-C4);
4.73 (H-C2, partially covered by HDO-signal); 13C NMR
(101 MHz): d ppm: 70.68 (m, C3); 71.92 (d, C6); 74.04 (s, C5);
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Deutsche For-
schungsgemeinschaft (Grant VO 348/3-1) and the
Fonds der Chemischen Industrie.
20
74.6 (m, C1); 75.23 (d, C2); 77.54 (d, C4); ½ꢀꢂD (8a) ꢃ15.7 ꢄ
20
(c=3.78, H2O, free acid); ½ꢀꢂD (8b) +19.6 ꢄ (c=1.23, H2O,
free acid).
15. The dephosphorylation of Ins(1,2,3,6)P4 (7) catalyzed by
the phytase was carried out at room temperature in a volume
of 13 mL (50 mM Mes/Na+ (pH 5.1), 0.05% Triton X-100
hydr) with an initial substrate concentration of 310 mM and a
volume activity of 1.4 mU/mL (total activity obtained from
5ꢅ109 cells) on a reciprocal shaker (40 rpm). Every 1.5 h new
substrate was added from a 20 mM stock solution (three
times). After 9 h of incubation the reaction was stopped with
3 mL 2.5 N HCl. The pH of the reaction-mixture was adjusted
to 7, and the denaturated protein was removed by centrifuga-
tion (6000g, 15 min, rt). Overall yield after purification by
HPLC was 45%, equivalent to 7.2 mmol Ins(2,3,6)P3 (8b).
16. Chung, S.-K.; Shin, B.-G.; Chang, Y.-T.; Suh, B.-C.; Kim,
K.-T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 659.
References and Notes
1. Shears, S. B. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1998, 1436, 49.
2. Xie, W.; Kaetzel, M. A.; Bruzik, K. S.; Dedman, J. R.;
Shears, S. B.; Nelson, D. J. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 14092.
3. Ho, M. W. Y.; Carew, M. A.; Yang, X.; Shears, S. B. In
Cockroft, S., Ed.; Frontiers in Molecular Biology: Biology of
Phosphoinositides; Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK,
2000; p 298.
4. Yang, X.; Rudolf, M.; Carew, M. A.; Yoshida, M.; Nerr-
eter, V.; Riley, A. M.; Chung, S. K.; Bruzik, K. S.; Potter,
B. V. L.; Schultz, C.; Shears, S. B. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274,
18973.