D. P. Becker et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 11 (2001) 2723–2725
Table 1. IC50 (nM)10 values for a-alkyl-a-amino-b-sulphone hydroxamates
2725
1
CompdR
R2
R3
X
MMP-13
MMP-2
MMP-1
MMP-1/13
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
5f
5g
5h
5i
5j
7a
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
Ph
Ac
H
CH3
H
H
CH3
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
S
41.5
0.2
24.0
1.6
0.3
2.4
1.1
1.4
40.0
0.6
5.0
1.3
0.2
1.3
0.5
0.4
0.2
80
540
3.2
184
0.2
4.6
0.75
>10,000
170
>10,000
1600
1200
2400
2350
>10,000
700
>10,000
>10,000
4400
>10,000
130
>240
850
>416
1000
4000
1000
2136
7143
1167
>62
>17
1833
>62
325
CH2CH3
CH2Ph
CH2CH2Ph
3,4-Methylenedioxybenzyl
2-Naphthylmethyl
Propargyl
Pyrrolidineacetyl
0.6
160
580
2.4
161
0.4
5.1
Ac
H
Benzoyl
H
H
H
H
H
7b
15a
15b
CGS 27023A
Marimastat
S
O
O
Ph
34.3
2.9
6.7
1.4
2.0
Table 2. IC50 (nM)10 values for a-pyrrolidine-b-sulphone hydrox-
amates
compounds in animal models of cancer and arthritis will
be disclosed in due course.
References and Notes
1. Becker, D. P.; Barta, T. E.; Bedell, L.; DeCrescenzo, G.;
Freskos, J.; Getman, D. P.; Hockerman, S. L.; Li, M.; Mehta,
P.; Mischke, B.; Munie, G. E.; Swearingen, C.; Villamil, C. I.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 2719.
2. Cawston, T. E. Pharmacol. Ther. 1996, 70, 163.
3. Nelson, A. R.; Gingleton, B.; Rothenberg, M. L.; Matri-
sian, L. M. J. Clin. Oncol. 2000, 18, 1135.
2
CompdR
MMP-13 MMP-2 MMP-1 MMP-1/13
10 (racemic)
Propargyl
10a (eutomer) Propargyl
10b (distomer) Propargyl
1.3
<0.1
60.0
0.2
<0.1
19.3 >10,000
400
300
308
>3000
>167
4. Freemont, A. J.; Byers, R. J.; Taiwo, Y. O.; Hoyland, J. A.
Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1999, 58, 357.
5. Wojtowicz-Praga, S.; Torri, J.; Johnson, M.; Steen, V.;
Marshall, J.; Ness, E.; Dickson, R.; Sale, M.; Rasmussen,
H. S.; Chiodo, R. A.; Hawkins, M. J. Clin. Oncol. 1998, 16,
2150.
6. Freskos, J. N.; Mischke, B. V.; DeCrescenzo, G. A.;
Heintz, R.; Getman, D. P.; Howard, S. C.; Kishore, N. N.;
McDonald, J. J.; Munie, G. E.; Rangwala, S.; Swearingen,
C. A.; Voliva, C.; Welsch, D. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
1999, 9, 943.
magnitude against both MMP-13 and MMP-2 as com-
paredto the less potent enantiomer (idstomer) 10b.
Compound 10a was also highly selective in sparing
MMP-1 (3000ꢀ).
Selectedanalogues were dosedorally in rats at 20 mpk
to assess absorption by measuring Cmax, andthe con-
centration remaining at 6 h was usedas an initial rough
indicator of the half-life. The a-methyl-a-amino analo-
gue 5b showeda high Cmax of 6.43 mg/mL, somewhat
greater than the corresponding thioether 7b (Cmax=1.54
mg/mL). N-Ethyl and N-benzyl analogues 5d and 5e
were moderately well absorbed (Cmax=0.561 and0.216
mg/mL, respectively), and N-propargyl amine 5i exhib-
iteda Cmax of 1.37 mg/mL. The propargyl substituent
was selectedfor inclusion with the expectation of
increasing the oral exposure, basedon in-house experi-
ence. However, all of the compounds tested were less
than 15 ng/mL in plasma at the 6 h time point.
7. Chan, C. O.; Cooksey, C. J.; Crich, D. J. Chem. Soc., Per-
kin Trans. 1 1992, 7, 777.
8. Obrecht, D.; Spiegler, C.; Schoenholzer, P.; Mueller, K.;
Heimgartner, H.; Stierli, F. Helv. Chim. Acta 1992, 75, 1666.
9. The resolution of 30 was accomplishedusing a Chiralpak
AD column (4.6 mmꢀ25 cm) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min
eluting with a mobile phase of 35:65 ethanol/heptane with
0.2% trifluoroacetic acid. Tony Yan is gratefully acknowl-
edged for performing the chiral separation.
10. Inhibitors were assayedagainst purifiedhMMP-13,
hMMP-1 andhMMP-2 using an enzyme assay basedon clea-
vage of the fluorogenic peptide MCA-Pro-Leu-Gly-Leu-Dpa-
Ala-Arg-NH2. This is similar to conditions described by
Knight, C. G. et al. FEBS Lett. 1992, 296, 263, except that
0.02% final concentration of 2-mercaptoethanol was usedin
the MMP-13 andMMP-1 assays. All basic compounds were
tested as their hydrochloride salts except for 10a and 10b,
which were testedas the trifluoroacetate salts.
In summary, we have described a promising series of a-
alkyl-a-amino-b-sulphone hydroxamates that are potent
inhibitors of both MMP-2 andMMP-13, andthat spare
MMP-1. Several analogues showedgoodabsorption
when administered orally in the rat. The efficacy of these