C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Acknowledgment. This work was partially supported by the
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grants-in-Aid for
Scientific Research 10450343, 13540374, 13029090).
Supporting Information Available: Text giving experimental
details and analytical data on new complexes and tables of X-ray
structural information, including data collection parameters, positional
and thermal parameters, and bond lengths and angles for complexes
2a, 2d, 2e, and 5d (PDF). A crystallographic file in CIF format. This
Figure 2. The ORTEP drawing of 5d with the thermal ellipsoid drawn at
the 50% probability level. The B(C6F5)4 anion is omitted for clarity.
Representative bond distances (Å) are as follows. Ru1-Ru2 ) 2.7741(4),
Ru1-N1 ) 2.105(3), Ru1-N2 ) 2.098(3), Ru1-H1 ) 1.59(5), Ru1-H2
) 1.86(5), Ru2-H2 ) 1.68(5), Ru2-N1 ) 2.135(3), Ru2-N2 ) 2.144-
(3), Ru2-C1 ) 2.113(3), N1-C1 ) 1.380(4), N2-C1 ) 1.384(4).
References
(1) Kondo, H.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Nagashima, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
500-501.
(2) (a) For reviews of amidinate, see: Barker, J.; Kilner, M. Coord. Chem.
ReV. 1994, 133, 219-300. Edelmann, F. T. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1994,
137, 403-481. (b) For organoruthenium amidinates, see: Yamaguchi,
Y.; Nagashima, H. Organometallics 2000, 19, 725-727.
Scheme 2
(3) For a review on dinuclear organotransition metal amidinates, see: Cotton,
F. A. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 5710-5720.
(4) Recent reviews on metal cluster, see: (a) Su¨ss-Fink, G.; Meister, G. AdV.
Organomet. Chem. 1993, 35, 41-133. (b) Catalysis by Di- and Polynulear
Metal Cluster Complexes; Adams, R. D., Cotton, F. A., Eds.; VCH: New
York, 1998. (c) Metal Clusters in Chemistry; Braunstein, P., Oro, L. A.,
Raithby, P. R., Eds.; VCH: New York, 1999.
(5) For recent progress on reactive diruthenium compounds, see: (a) Haines,
R. J. ComprehensiVe Organometallic Chemistry II; Abel, E. W., Stone,
F. G. A., Wilkinson, G., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, U.K., 1995; Vol. 7,
pp 625-681. (b) Ko¨elle, U. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 1313-1334. (c) Suzuki,
H.; Omori, H.; Lee, D. H.; Yoshida, Y.; Fukushima, M.; Tanaka, M.;
Moro-oka, Y. Organometallics 1994, 13, 1129-1146. (d) Iwasa, T.;
Shimada, H.; Takami, A.; Matsuzaka, H.; Ishii, Y.; Hidai, M. Inorg. Chem.
1999, 38, 2851-2859. (e) Braun, T.; Laubender, M.; Gevert, O.; Werner,
H. Chem. Ber./Recl. 1997, 130, 559-563.
(6) Since the “perpendicularly” coordinated amidinate ligand is a 7 electron
donor to the neutral diruthenium moiety, the total electron count [sum of
two Cp* (5e × 2), Br (1e), µ2-amidinate (7), and Ru-Ru (2e)] of 1 is 36.
In contrast, that of 2a-2d is 34, if the ruthenium-ruthenium bond is
single. A vacant site for the coordination of the ligand or oxidative addition
of H2 is on the Ru(1) atom.
(7) Recent progress on coordinatively unsaturated mononuclear complexes:
(a) Poli, R. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 2135-2204. (b) Caulton, K. G. New J.
Chem. 1994, 18, 25-41. (c) Tenorio, M. J.; Mereiter, K.; Puerta, H. C.;
Valerga, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11230-11231. (d) Gemel, C.;
Huffman, J. C.; Caulton, K. G.; Mauthner, K.; Kirchner, K. J. Organomet.
Chem. 2000, 594, 342-353.
(8) Crystal data for 2a: monoclinic space group C2/c, a ) 31.5792(15) Å, b
) 15.1007(5) Å, c ) 14.4272(7) Å, â ) 110.9710(10)°, V ) 6424.2(5)
Å3, Z ) 8, R1 ) 0.0401, wR2 ) 0.0956 (I > 2σ(I)), R1 ) 0.0579, wR2 )
0.1046 (all data). 2d: monoclinic space group P21/c, a ) 14.1770(5) Å,
b ) 15.2535(4) Å, c ) 23.5483(8) Å, â ) 92.7110(10)°, V ) 5086.6(3)
Å3, Z ) 4, R1 ) 0.0377, wR2 ) 0.1070 (I > 2σ(I)), R1 ) 0.0481, wR2 )
0.1221 (all data). Analytical as well as spectroscopic data of 2a-d are
listed in the Supporting Information.
In a typical example, treatment of 2d with H2 (1 atm) in CH2Cl2
resulted in rapid color change of the solution from purple to yellow.
From the reaction mixture, the corresponding oxidative adduct 5d
was isolated quantitatively. NMR spectra suggest the Cs-symmetric
structure of 5d, showing inequivalent C5Me5 groups and two sets
of signals due to the isopropyl groups of the bridging amidinate
ligand. Two Ru-H peaks were seen as sharp singlets at δ -5.60
and -7.77 ppm. The T1 value of these two Ru-H signals at 293 K
was 4.060 (δ -5.60 ppm) and 2.854 s (δ -7.77 ppm), suggesting
that these are not nonclassical hydrides.10 The IR spectrum of 5d
showed a νRu-H absorption at 1956 cm-1. These assignments were
2
supported by H NMR spectra of 5d-d2, which was synthesized
from 2d with D2, showing Ru-D signals at δ -5.44 and -7.72
ppm. The IR spectrum of 5d-d2 resulted in the disappearance of
the absorption at 1956 cm-1 by the isotopic shift. The Cs-symmetric
diruthenium dihydride structure was proved by crystallographic
analysis of 5d,11 in which arrangement of the C5Me5 groups and
the bridging amidinate are similar to those seen in 2d. Of particular
interest is that one hydride is located at the terminal position,
whereas the other bridges the Ru-Ru bond. The terminal hydride
is in the trans position to the bridging hydride as shown in Figure
2. The existence of the bridging hydride caused the relatively short
Ru-Ru bond (2.7741(4) Å), which is 0.15 Å shorter than that of
2d.
In summary, we have accomplished the preparation of isolable
yet highly reactive “cationic coordinatively unsaturated” diruthe-
nium compounds bearing a bridging amidinate ligand and weakly
coordinating counteranions,12 which is a rare example of dinuclear
coordinatively unsaturated compounds.13 The µ2-amidinate ligand
in the unusual coordination mode compared with other dinuclear
transition amidinates plays an essential role in stabilizing the co-
ordinatively unsaturated bimetallic centers, though further investiga-
tion is required to clarify how the perpendicular µ2-amidinate ligand
stabilizes the bimetallic moiety in the coordinatively unsaturated
state. We believe that these results are an important clue to the
development of new reactions and catalysis of diruthenium com-
pounds involving activation of various substrates by coordinatively
unsaturated organodiruthenium species, and further investigation
on the reactivity of these new compounds is actively in progress.
(9) Although a possibility that reversible coordination of the solvent is involved
in the interconversion cannot be completely excluded, it was confirmed
that there was no sign of coordination of the solvent in the NMR spectra
at -80 °C.
(10) Hamilton, D. G.; Crabtree, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 4126-
4133.
(11) Crystal data for 5d: monoclinic space group P21/c, a ) 14.1154(3) Å, b
) 15.3888(3) Å, c ) 23.4856(7) Å, â ) 93.4660(9)°, V ) 5092.2(2) Å3,
Z ) 4, R1 ) 0.0417, wR2 ) 0.1248 (I > 2σ(I)), R1 ) 0.0481, wR2
0.1316 (all data).
)
(12) It is known that a triflate anion can be coordinated to the transition metal.14
The crystal structure of the OTf complex, 2e, which was available by
treatment of 1 with AgOTf, showed that the Ru-OTf distance is 2.360
(2) Å, indicating a weak Ru-O bonding interaction, in sharp contrast to
the fact that the Ru-counteranion distances are over 3.9 Å in 2a or 2d.
The Ru-C1 distance in 2e is 2.126 (3) Å, and θ1, θ2, and θ3 are 106.7,
153.1, and 100.2°, respectively; these values are between those of 1 and
2a-d. The Ru-O bonding interaction is only seen in the solid states,
and easily cleaved in solution leading to facile “swing” of the bridging
amidinate ligand (VT studies). Furthermore, reaction of 2e with CO,
isonitriles, or H2 proceeded in a fashion similar to that of 2d to give the
corresponding CO (3e), 2,4,6-Me3C6H2NC (4e), and dihydride (5e)
complexes in 87, 95, and 97% yield. The results are summarized in the
Supporting Information.
(13) Only one example reported: Matsuzaka, H.; Qu¨, J.-P.; Ogino, T.; Nishio,
M.; Nishibayashi, Y.; Ishii, Y.; Uemura, S.; Hidai, M. J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans. 1996, 4307-4312.
(14) For an example of the Ru-η1-OTf complex, see: Ontko, A. C.; Houlis, J.
F.; Schnabel, R. C.; Roddick, D. M. Organometallics 1998, 17, 5467-
5476 and references therein.
JA016899H
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 4, 2002 535