was observed that the monocyclic intermediate 5c was
formed highly selectively, suggesting that the ab-mode RCM
reaction may be much faster than those of ac, bd, and cd
modes, which may account for the highly selective formation
of fused bicyclic product 2c. Upon treating of 5c with 5 mol
% of (Cy3P)2Cl2RudCHPh, 2c was formed exclusively in
89% yield (Scheme 4).
Scheme 1
Scheme 4
As expected, the reaction of 1a and 1b did afford a mixture
of ab/cd-mode and ac/bd-mode products with the dumbell-
type products 3 as the major products (Scheme 3).
To investigate the possibility of fast conversion of the in
situ formed dumbell-type product 3c to 2c, N-(4-(1,6-
heptadienyl))propenamide 6c, precursor to 1c, was synthe-
sized.9 The reaction of 6c afforded monocyclic products 7c
and 8c in 79% and 10% yields, respectively. Here, the RCM
reaction of the bd mode is much faster than that of the cd
mode. Monocyclic product 7c can be further converted to
9c, which upon treatment with 5 mol % of (PCy3)2Cl2Rud
CHPh afforded 3c and 2c in 62% and 13% yields, respec-
tively (Scheme 5). Treatment of isolated pure dumbell-type
product 3c under the catalysis of (Cy3P)2Cl2RudCHPh in
CH2Cl2 did not afford the fused bicyclic product 2c,
indicating that 2c was formed directly via the double RCM
reaction of 1c (Scheme 5).
Scheme 2. Double RCM Strategy for N-Containing Bicycles
Furthermore, it is interesting to note that by starting from
1d (a methyl group was introduced into the terminal position
To our surprise, the reaction of 1c9 afforded the corre-
sponding products with a ratio of fused bicyclic compound
2c to dumbell-type bicyclic compound 3c as high as 21:1 in
a combined yield of 88% (Scheme 3). The structure of 2c
was unambiguously determined by its conversion to the trans
dibromide 4c, which was characterized by an X-ray diffrac-
tion study.10 When we followed this reaction carefully, it
(4) Pearson, W. H.; Suga, H. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 9910-9918. (b)
Michel, P.; Rassat, A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commum. 1999, 2281-2282.
(c) Takahata, H.; Kubota, M.; Ihara, K.; Okamoto, N.; Momose, T.; Azer,
N.; Eldefrawi, A. T.; Eldefrawi, M. E. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9,
3289-3301. (d) Comins, D. L.; Lamunyon, D. H. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57,
5807-5809.
(5) Alkene Metathesis in Organic Synthesis; Topics in Organometallic
Chemistry; Fu¨rstner, A., Ed.; Springer: Germany, 1998. For an account on
Ru complex-catalyzed RCM reaction, see: Grubbs, R. H.; Miller, S.; Fu,
G. C. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 446-452. For a seminal paper of Ru-
catalyzed double RCM reaction, see: Fu, G. C.; Nguyen, S. B. T.; Grubbs,
R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9856-9857.
(6) For reports on the synthesis of izidine alkaloid skeletons through the
ring by ring approach via a RCM reaction, see: (a) Paolucci, C.; Musiani,
L.; Venturelli, F.; Fava, A. Synthesis 1997, 1415-1417. (b) Arisawa, M.;
Takezawa, E.; Nishida, A.; Mori, M.; Nakagawa, M. Synlett 1997, 1179-
1180. (c) Barrett, A. G. M.; Baugh, S. P. D.; Gibson, V. C.; Giles, M. R.;
Marshall, E. L.; Procopiou, P. A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1997,
155-156.
Scheme 3
(7) For the formation of spirocyclic compounds via double or triple RCM,
see: (a) Baylon, C.; Heck, M. P.; Mioskowski, C. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64,
3354-3360. (b) Bassindale, M. J.; Hamley, P.; Leitner, A.; Harrity, J. P.
A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3247-3250; (c) Wallace, D. J.; Cowden,
C. J.; Kennedy, D. J.; Ashwood, M. S.; Cottrell, I. F.; Dolling, U. H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 2027-2029. (d) Heck, M. P.; Baylon, C.; Nolan,
S. P.; Mioskowski, C. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1989-1991.
640
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 4, 2002