K. H. Jang et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 1078–1081
1079
combined with the presence of a sulfur and several oxygens in the
mass data.
Given this information, the planar structure of 1 was determined
by a combination of 1H COSY, gHSQC, and gHMBC analyses. These
data readily defined a linear array of downfield NMR signals to form
indicated the 2R⁄, 3R⁄ relative configurations. Due to the free rota-
tion of the side chain, however, the relative configuration at the
sulfate-bearing C-4 remained unassigned at this stage.
Given this information, 1 was further derivatized to compare
spectroscopic data with known compounds. That is, treatment
with H2SO4/H2O/THF converted 1 to 2-amino-1,3,4-trihydroxyoc-
tadec-6-enoate (6). The 1H NMR spectrum and LC–ESIMS data
(m/z 317 [M+H]+) of the product confirmed the sulfate hydrolysis.
Hydrogenation of 6 with H2 with Pd/C furnished the phytosphingo-
sine (7). Comparison of the 1H NMR spectra of 7 with reported data
a
partial structure: –CH2–CH–CH–CH–CH2–CH@CH–CH2–. The
placement of heteroatoms in this framework was accomplished
by observing the chemical shifts and comparing the spectroscopic
data with those in the literature. That is, two hydroxy and an amine
group were placed at C-1, C-3, and C-2, respectively, by carbon
chemical shifts: dC 59.3 (C-1), 56.7 (C-2), and 70.6 (C-3). The down-
field shift of the C-4 methine (dH 4.30, dC 79.1) assigned the sulfate
group to this location. The remaining portion of the molecule, con-
sisting of one methyl and nine methylene groups, was linearly at-
tached at C-8 on the basis of proton and carbon chemical shifts,
thus forming a sulfated sphingosine, 2-amino-1,3-dihydroxyocta-
dec-6-ene-4-sulfate, for 1. The E configuration of the C-6 double
bond was assigned by the downfield shifts of allylic methylene car-
bons at dC 34.9 (C-5) and 33.8 (C-8), as well as cross peaks of H-5
and H-8 with olefinic ones in the NOESY data.
for commercial phytosphingosine (
stereomers ( -arabino, -lyxo, -xylo) showed identity between 7
and a phytosphingosine (
-ribo) 8.7 However, the specific rotations
D-ribo) 8 and its synthetic dia-
D
D
D
D
of 7 and its per-acetyl derivative 7a, prepared for the enhancement
of specific rotation, were the opposite of both phytosphingosine 8
and its per-acetyl derivative 8a (½a D25
ꢀ10.3, ꢀ4.0, +11.6, and +26.0
ꢂ
in CHCl3 for 7, 7a, 8, and 8a, respectively). Despite the remarkable
difference in the scalar values of optical rotations, these results as-
signed the 2R, 3R, and 4S configurations for 1.
The stereochemistry of 1 was also approached by another
chemical derivatization followed by CD measurements.8a,b As
shown in Scheme 1, in the first step, the natural product-derived
phytosphingosine (7) and commercial phytosphingosine (8) were
converted into N-naphthimide derivatives (7b and 8b), then ester-
ified to yield the pernaphthoate derivatives (7c and 8c, respec-
tively). Although the NMR data of these compounds were the
same, the CD spectra were opposite to each other [7c, extrema at
A literature survey revealed that the structure of 1 was identical
to that of a sulfated sphingosine previously isolated from the same
S. abata. However, the specific rotations measured for 1 and its per-
acetylated derivative 1a (½a D25
ꢀ16.8 and ꢀ20.4 for 1 and 1a,
ꢂ
respectively in CHCl3) were found to be the opposite of that re-
ported previously (½a D25
ꢂ
+26 in CHCl3 for the per-acetylated deriv-
ative).6a–c This prompted us to extensively investigate the
stereochemistry of this compound by diverse chemical derivatiza-
tions followed by measurements of specific rotation and CD.5c,7,8a,b
First, as shown in Scheme 1, the relative configurations at C-2 to
C-4 were approached by a ketal formation.4 Treatment of 1 with
2,2-dimethoxypropane and pyridinium p-toluenesulfonate (PPTS)
in acetone yielded the corresponding 1,3-cyclic ketal, 5. The vicinal
coupling constants (J1ax,2 = 5.8 Hz, J1eq,2 = 4.8 Hz, J2,3 = 8.0 Hz) anal-
ysis, aided by NOESY cross peaks at H-1ax (dH 3.65)/H-3, H-1ax/ke-
tal-Me (dH 1.41), H-3/ketal-Me, and H-1eq (dH 3.99)/ketal-Me (dH
1.36), positioned H-2 and H-3 in the anti orientation, and thus
240 nm (
D
e
ꢀ5.0), 248 nm (0.0), 263 nm (+2.2); 8c, 240 nm
(+5.1), 248 nm (0.0), 263 nm (ꢀ2.2)] (Fig. 2). Thus, the structure
of compound 1 was determined to be (E)-(2R,3R,4S)-2-amino-1,3-
dihydroxyoctadec-6-ene-4-sulfate by application of the Cotton ef-
fect.8b It is noteworthy that sphingosines from the same sponges
were enantiomeric to each other.5c
Spectroscopic analyses readily determined that the structure of
compound 2, having the molecular formula C17H35NO6S, was
analogous to its congener 1. Combined 2-D NMR experiments
revealed this compound to be a desmethylene derivative of 1.
4.8 Hz
OH
a
H
8.0 Hz
O
O
O
O
H
HO
8
5.8 Hz
NH3+ OSO3
-
+H3N
H
8
NH3+ OSO3
-
1
H
5
NOE
OH
OH
b
c
HO
HO
8
8
NH3+ OH
NH3+ OH
6
7
O
OH
O
O
OH
d
e
C14H29
C14H29
O
C14H29
HO
O
HO
OH
O
N
N
NH2 OH
O
O
O
O
L-ribo [2R, 3R, 4S] (7)
D-ribo [2S, 3S, 4R] (8)
7b, 8b
7c, 8c
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (a) N2, 2,2-dimethoxypropane, PPTS, acetone, rt, 2 h; (b) H2SO4/H2O/THF, rt, 1 h; (c) H2, Pd/C, MeOH, rt, 10 h; (d) 2,3-
naphthalenedicarboxylic acid anhydride, pyridine, reflux, 15 h; (e) 2-naphthoylimidazole, DBU, MeCN, rt, 3 h.