4290
M. Kimura et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 4287–4290
antioxidative activities. Surprisingly, the 4-hydroxy
derivative 11 displayed the most potent activity, show-
ing a 4.7-fold more potent activity than a-tocopherol,
with an IC50 value of 0.32 lM. This may be due to its
higher capacity as a hydrogen donor to form a stable
radical, as well as the phenols known as antioxi-
dants,23;24 in addition to the Àr effect. In contrast with
the results described above, the nitro derivative 9f hav-
ing a high r effect as an electron-withdrawing sub-
dual actions of dopamine uptake inhibition and an-
tioxidative activity.
References and notes
1. Beal, M. F. Ann. Neurol. 1995, 38, 357.
2. Halliwell, B. Drugs Aging 2001, 18, 685.
3. Mylonas, C.; Kouretas, D. In Vivo 1999, 13, 295.
4. Mattson, M. P. Trends Neurosci. 1998, 21, 53.
5. Behl, C. Prog. Neurobiol. 1999, 57, 301.
stituent
dramatically.
decreased
the
antioxidative
activity
Subsequently, as another approach to the enhancement
of antioxidative activity by modification of the phenyl
ring, the compounds replaced by an antioxidant struc-
ture known in the literature25;26 such as 3,4,5-tri-meth-
oxy 9g and 3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxy 6 derivatives,
were also evaluated. Both compounds showed potent
antioxidative activities with IC50 values of 1.4 and
2.8 lM, respectively, and the activity of the 3,4,5-tri-
methoxy derivative 9g was comparable to that of a-
tocopherol. These findings suggest that the compounds
containing an antioxidant structure in the phenylamino
moiety also show potent antioxidative activities.
6. Browne, S. E.; Ferrante, R. J.; Beal, M. F. Brain Pathol.
1999, 9, 147.
7. Yoshikawa, T. Eur. Neurol. 1993, 33, 60.
8. Jenner, P.; Olanow, C. W. Neurology 1996, 47, S161.
9. Ciccone, C. D. Phys. Ther. 1998, 78, 313.
10. Obata, T.; Yamanaka, Y. Nippon Yakurigaku Zasshi 2001,
117, 105.
11. Przedborski, S.; Mitsumoto, H.; Rowland, L. P. Curr.
Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2003, 3, 70.
12. Graybiel, A. M.; Hirsch, E. C.; Agid, Y. Adv. Neurol.
1990, 53, 17.
13. Ziv, I.; Melamed, E. Mov Disord. 1998, 13, 865.
14. Behl, C. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 1999, 69, 213.
15. Yoshikawa, T.; Minamiyama, Y.; Naito, Y.; Kondo, M.
J. Neurochem. 1994, 62, 1034.
16. Mason, R. P.; Olmstead, E. G.; Jacob, R. F. Biochem.
Pharmacol. 2000, 60, 709.
17. Kimura, M.; Masuda, T.; Yamada, K.; Mitani, M.;
Kubota, N.; Kawakatsu, N.; Kishii, K.; Inazu, M.;
Kiuchi, Y.; Oguchi, K.; Namiki, T. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2003, 11, 1621.
Thus, the SAR studies of compounds modified at the
diphenylalkyl moiety and the phenyl ring in the phen-
ylamino moiety of 1 suggest that the phenylamino
moiety is the essential pharmacophore for the antioxi-
dative activity.
In conclusion, a series of novel diphenyl piperazine
derivatives with high affinities for the DAT, which were
modified at both of the diphenylalkyl moiety and the
phenyl ring in the phenylamino moiety of compound 1,
was evaluated for antioxidative activity in canine brain
homogenates. Most of them showed apparent antioxi-
dative activities with IC50 values of approximately
micromolar order, including some compounds with
activity equal to or higher than a-tocopherol. Among
them, the 4-hydroxyphenyl derivative 11 exhibited the
most potent activity with an IC50 value of 0.32 lM,
which was approximately 5-fold more potent than a-
tocopherol. The SAR studies suggested that the modi-
fication at the site between the diphenylmethyl and
piperazine moieties has no great influence on the anti-
oxidative activity, and that the introduction of a sub-
stituent having a Àr effect as an electronic property into
the phenyl ring of the phenylamino moiety is more likely
to increase the activity. Moreover, compound 11 was
suggested to display the extraordinary antioxidative
activity, probably due to the formation of a stable
radical in addition to the Àr effect. These results also
suggest that these novel diphenylalkyl piperazine deriv-
atives may serve as effective treatments for PD, with
18. Kimura, M.; Masuda, T.; Yamada, K.; Mitani, M.;
Kubota, N.; Kawakatsu, N.; Kishii, K.; Inazu, M.;
Kiuchi, Y.; Oguchi, K.; Namiki, T. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2003, 11, 3953.
19. Kimura, M.; Masuda, T.; Yamada, K.; Kubota, N.;
Kawakatsu, N.; Mitani, M.; Kishii, K.; Inazu, M.;
Namiki, T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002, 12, 1947.
20. Yao, K.; Ina, Y.; Nagashima, K.; Ohmori, K.; Ohno, T.
Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2000, 23, 766.
21. The evaluation of antioxidative activity was carried out
according to the method described in Ref. 20. A concen-
tration–response curve was obtained from three separate
experiments and the IC50 value was expressed as the
concentration of the test compound required to inhibit
auto-oxidative lipid peroxidation in canine brain homo-
genates by 50%.
22. Topliss, J. G. J. Med. Chem. 1977, 20, 463.
23. Sugiyama, N.; Akahoshi, F.; Kuwahara, S.; Kajii, M.;
Sakaue, Y.; Yakumaru, H.; Sugihara, M.; Fukaya, C.
J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 1977.
24. Valgimigli, L.; Banks, J. T.; Lusztyk, J.; Ingold, K. U.
J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 3381.
25. Sgaragli, G. P.; Valoti, M.; Gorelli, B.; Fusi, F.; Palmi,
M.; Mantovani, P. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1993, 110, 369.
26. Kato, T.; Ozaki, T.; Tamura, K.; Suzuki, Y.; Akima, M.;
Ohi, N. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 3134.