It has been suggested that an acquired hypoplastic
defect may be a result of a systemic effect on the
ameloblasts.4 In the case of a systemic insult to the
ameloblasts, a bilateral expression of the defect and
its presence in both jaws is expected. However, as
ameloblasts do not become secretory simultaneously,
presence of a lesion in less than all four quadrants
need not rule out systemic influence.4 Of the
subjects studied, only 17 per cent of the twins, 15
per cent of the Aborigines and 11 per cent of the
singletons showed two or more affected teeth (Table
1). Furthermore, absence of the defect on other
tooth types whose crown formation overlaps that of
the canines, and the observation of a greater
frequency of occurrence of the defect in the lower
jaw, lessen the possibility of a systemic cause.
Table 5. Twin concordances for frequency,
position and size of hypoplastic lesions
Concordance %
Trait
Monozygous
Dizygous
Presence of at least one lesion
Number of teeth affected
Incisocervical position
Mesiodistal position
55
43
42
53
73
54
30
48
Frequency
In the current study, the defect has been shown to
occur more frequently in the lower jaw with no
detectable difference in prevalence between sexes.
1,3,4
This has also been reported in previous studies.
Skinner4 suggested that this may be a reflection of
the presence of a thicker layer of soft tissue,
especially fat cheeks, overlying and protecting the
upper canines from trauma, or alternatively, it may
result from a reduction or total absence of protective
alveolar bone in the lower jaw. An increased
frequency in the mandible may also reflect the
marked protrusion of the lower canines during early
growth and development.This is illustrated in Fig.2.
Such exposure may make mandibular canines more
susceptible to physical trauma. This is an example
where environmental influences may be interacting
with an underlying genetic predisposition to produce
a phenotypic effect.
The susceptibility of deciduous canines to display
the defect may indeed have some genetic basis. In
the current study involving the twin data set, seven
pairs of MZ twins and six pairs of DZ twins showed
mirror-imaging for size and location of lesions. This
indicates subjectively that there may be an under-
lying genetic predisposition to lesion development.
However, the concordance value for presence of at
least one lesion in MZ twin pairs was only 55 per
cent, indicating substantial environmental variation.
This is further evidence that lesion development
reflects a complex interplay between genetic and
environmental factors. Further analysis using more
advanced genetic modelling is warranted to quantify
the relative contributions of genotype and
environment.
Localized trauma as an aetiological factor in
formation of the hypoplastic defect has been
supported by the majority of previous studies.
However, none of these studies have employed the
three very distinct groups of subjects who were
included in this study.
1,3-5,7
The highest percentage of subjects with at least
one lesion was noted in twins. Twinning has long
been associated with both prenatal and perinatal
mortality and morbidity, with perinatal mortality
estimated to be 11 times that of normal singleton
Ethnic differences in frequency may reflect either
genetic or environmental differences, or more likely
a combination of the two. It is difficult to quantify
the relative contributions of these two components
based only upon interpopulation comparisons,
however some inferences may be drawn about the
impact of various socio-economic and cultural
differences.
12
births. Twins have a much higher incidence of pre-
mature birth, and gestation is on average three weeks
shorter than singletons. Parity is also important.The
second-born twin is at greater risk of oxygen
deficiency and birth trauma due to abnormal uterine
positioning.13 A higher frequency of low birth weight
resulting from nutritional deficiency has also been
observed.14 Perinatal and prenatal growth retardation
and prematurity observed in twins may be factors
associated with the aetiology of the hypoplastic lesion.
Seow15 has commented on the high prevalence of
enamel hypoplasia (both localized and generalized)
in low birth weight and premature children with a
range of 43-96 per cent. Such dental defects have
been variously associated with low bone mineral
stores, traumatic laryngoscopy and prolonged
endotracheal intubation.15 With respect to the
greater risk of nutritional and oxygen deficiency in
twins, the chance of an abrupt cessation of enamel
formation through sudden ameloblast death, and
If the aetiology were dictated by environmental
factors alone, in particular physical trauma, one may
have expected a greater frequency of affected teeth
within the Aboriginal population, who were exposed
to harsher environmental conditions and a greater
likelihood of developmental trauma. More
importantly, one would have expected a greater
frequency of individuals with multiple teeth affected,
but this was not the case. The results in this study
suggest that the large differences between the two
groups in lifestyle, diet and socio-economic status
are having only a small impact on the frequency of
occurrence of the lesion.
88
Australian Dental Journal 2000;45:2.