Enol Ether Radical Cations
A R T I C L E S
that the solvent is highly organized in the TS of the heterolysis
to accommodate the formation of charge.
case of alkyl radicals 21 and 22 where the diphenylethene
moiety in 21 results in about a 100-fold increase in the rate of
cyclization in comparison to 22. The origin of this effect is not
apparent, but it clearly is not a result of an offset between
activation energies and entropies of activation for the cycliza-
tions. One possible explanation is that the diphenylethenyl group
inherently accelerates the cyclization by providing a more stable
radical product as it does for simple radical cyclizations, but a
steric interaction of the highly substituted radical cation center
with this moiety works to retard the cyclization. Some support
for this conjecture is found in the cyclizations of tertiary R-ester
and R-amide radicals 23b that are 2 orders of magnitude slower
than cyclizations of the analogous secondary radicals 23a,
apparently due to steric effects involving the planar radical
center.26,29
For reactions in the “b” series (the 6-exo cyclizations of
radical cations 1b and 2b), the cyclization reactions and not
the heterolyses were rate limiting in ACN solutions containing
TFE. These reactions were found to be slower than those in
the “a” series in the same solvent mixture, and the solvent
polarity effects on the kinetics were minor. The good match in
the rate constants from radicals 5b-E and 5b-P, both of which
give radical cation 1b, demonstrates that the heterolyses steps
were not involved in the kinetics.
In ACN without TFE, however, the observed rate constants
for the diethyl phosphate-containing radicals 5b-E and 8b were
convolutions of the rate constants for heterolysis and cyclization.
The diphenylphosphatoxy radical 5b-P in ACN must heterolyze
much faster than the measured rate by analogy to radical 5a-P,
and the observed rate constant for 5b-P in ACN is that for the
cyclization of radical cation 1b. In the case of radical 8b reacting
to give radical cation 2b, we could deconvolute the two rate
constants, but this was not possible for radical 5b-E because
the yield was low, and the signal-to-noise was poor. Thus, the
reported kinetic values for 5b-E in ACN are from first-order
solutions to data that are convoluted. Because the convolution
of similar rate constants results in an apparent first-order rate
constant that is smaller than the actual values, the reported rate
constant for “cyclization” of radical 1b in ACN of 1.4 × 107
s-1 at 20 °C is a lower limit; the actual value will be close to
Only limiting values could be obtained for the kinetics of
the 7-exo cyclizations of enol ether radical cations 1c and 2c
because these cyclization reactions were slow enough such that
bimolecular reactions were important in the overall rates of
reaction. Competing reactions are indicated for radical cation
2c by the low yields of product 10c and the fact that the observed
rate constants increased when the reactions were conducted with
increasingly dilute solutions (data not shown). The yields of
distonic radical cation product 6c from radical cation 1c are
similar to the product yields from radical cation 1b produced
from the phosphate radical precursor 5b-P, but the observed
decrease in rate constants as the solvent polarity was increased
suggests that second-order reactions of 1c with phosphate anion
are increasingly important in the lower polarity solvent mixtures.
Because the observed rate constant is the sum of all rate
constants for reactions of 1c, the values we obtained must be
upper limits for the rate constants for cyclizations.
2 × 107 s-1 25
.
The Arrhenius parameters for the reactions in the “b” series
are consistent with those expected for 6-exo cyclizations if one
uses the results of radical cyclizations as a guide. Specifically,
the entropic terms (log A) for cyclizations of 1b and 2b are
quite similar to those for analogous carbon-centered radi-
cals.8,26,27 It is perhaps more interesting to focus on the activation
energies for these cyclization reactions that are the key features
in the kinetics. The enol ether radical cation cyclizations were
expected to be much faster than the cyclizations of analogous
radicals, and that is the case for radicals 1b and 2b, which
cyclize at ambient temperature about 100 and 10 000 times faster
than radicals 21 and 22, respectively.27,28 If one considers the
cyclization reaction to be a typical “radical reaction”, the radical
cations might be regarded as super-radicals.
Ion-Pair Reactions. The ultimate yields of diphenylalkyl
radical products 6 and 10 provide information about reactions
occurring in the ion pairs initially produced by the heterolysis
reactions. The 6-exo cyclizations of 1b and 2b were slow enough
such that cyclization occurred for diffusively free radical cations
only (see above). If one focuses on the yields of products from
the 6-exo cyclization reactions in Table 1, one sees that the
yields appreciably increased as the solvent polarity increased
by addition of TFE. This solvent polarity effect on yield reflects
increasing amounts of radical cation that successfully escape
from the initially formed ion pairs as the solvent polarity was
increased.
Scheme 6 shows the possible reactions in the ion pair. The
initial heterolysis reaction produces an ion pair with a dialkyl
phosphate anion positioned next to the enol ether radical cation.
Collapse of the ion pair will return the â-phosphate radical or
a rearranged radical 24. If the original radical is produced in an
ion pair collapse reaction, it will simply heterolyze again.
Radical 24 might heterolyze back to the ion pair rapidly, but
there is evidence that â-alkoxy-â-phosphatoxyalkyl radicals such
as 24 will be more stable than R-alkoxy-â-phosphatoxyalkyl
radicals. For example, computed energies for radicals 26 and
27 at the B3LYP/6-31G* level indicate that 27 is more stable
than 26 by about 3 kcal/mol due to an anomeric effect that
stabilizes radical 27.30 If radical 24 does not heterolyze rapidly,
One surprising kinetic result is that radical cations 1b and
2b have comparable rate constants for cyclization, unlike the
(22) Choi, S. Y.; Crich, D.; Horner, J. H.; Huang, X. H.; Newcomb, M.; Whitted,
P. O. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 3317-3326.
(23) Whitted, P. O.; Horner, J. H.; Newcomb, M.; Huang, X. H.; Crich, D.
Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 153-156.
(24) Newcomb, M.; Horner, J. H.; Whitted, P. O.; Crich, D.; Huang, X. H.;
Yao, Q. W.; Zipse, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10685-10694.
(25) Simulated convoluted data for consecutive reactions, both with rate constants
of 3 × 107 s-1, give an apparent rate constant of 1.8 × 107 s-1 when solved
as a first-order process.
(26) Newcomb, M.; Horner, J. H.; Filipkowski, M. A.; Ha, C.; Park, S. U. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 3674-3684.
(27) Newcomb, M.; Choi, S. Y.; Horner, J. H. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 1225-
1231.
(29) Musa, O. M.; Choi, S. Y.; Horner, J. H.; Newcomb, M. J. Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 786-793.
(30) Horner, J. H. Unpublished results.
(28) Beckwith, A. L. J.; Moad, G. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1974, 472-
473.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 19, 2002 5407